Re: [UC] O the process. O the principles. O tempore, o mores

2005-04-21 Thread Krfapt
In a message dated 4/21/2005 12:57:03 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I think the biggest problem in all this is deciding whether or not the taco bell down at 3401 walnut will be really REALLY mexican. Laserbeam's usually sharp focus seems to have gotten a bit

Re: [UC] O the process. O the principles. O tempore, o mores

2005-04-21 Thread L a s e r B e a m ®
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I think the biggest problem in all this is deciding whether or not the taco bell down at 3401 walnut will be really REALLY mexican. Laserbeam's usually sharp focus seems to have gotten a bit blurred. He's assuming a homogeniety to

[UC] O the process. O the principles. O tempore, o mores

2005-04-20 Thread Krfapt
All that hoohah about 40th Street. First a steering committee. Then meetings up the gazoo. Then Omar Blaik (the master of speaking with a forked tongue) saying that Penn wanted only to have a seat at the table, not to control the process. Then a set of hi-falutin' community-driven

Re: [UC] O the process. O the principles. O tempore, o mores

2005-04-20 Thread Matthew Snyder
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All that hoohah about 40th Street. First a steering committee. Then meetings up the gazoo. Then Omar Blaik (the master of speaking with a forked tongue) saying that Penn wanted only to have a seat at the table, not to control the process. Then a set of hi-falutin'

RE: [UC] O the process. O the principles. O tempore, o mores

2005-04-20 Thread Jensen, Shannon
that incites anger? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew Snyder Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2005 12:27 PM To: univcity@list.purple.com Subject: Re: [UC] O the process. O the principles. O tempore, o mores [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote

Re: [UC] O the process. O the principles. O tempore, o mores

2005-04-20 Thread L a s e r B e a m ®
Jensen, Shannon wrote: There are a lot of problems with 40th St and the planning process, but I see few problems with the 39th St development proposed in the article forwarded. Shouldn't the community want to get students out of their once beautiful, now-subdivided homes... what exactly is it

RE: [UC] O the process. O the principles. O tempore, o mores

2005-04-20 Thread Jensen, Shannon
, April 20, 2005 5:31 PM To: Jensen, Shannon Subject: Re: [UC] O the process. O the principles. O tempore, o mores In a message dated 4/20/2005 5:17:54 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Shouldn't the community want to get students out of their once beautiful, now

Re: [UC] O the process. O the principles. O tempore, o mores

2005-04-20 Thread Mark Krull
Oh the humanity Sorry could not resisit -Mark -Original Message- From: L a s e r B e a m ® [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Apr 20, 2005 5:32 PM To: univcity@list.purple.com Subject: Re: [UC] O the process. O the principles. O tempore, o mores Jensen, Shannon wrote: There are a lot

Re: [UC] O the process. O the principles. O tempore, o mores

2005-04-20 Thread L a s e r B e a m ®
Jensen, Shannon wrote: In response to laserbeam: (well, one problem is that we had to read it in the dp to know about it, another problem is you asking this list now what the community wants.) I am not asking what the community wants, I am just sick of people attacking things without actually