Re: [UC] Trees on 4500 Walnut Street

2007-04-24 Thread SKnight
you're definitely correct about the tree pits being too small. sk - Original Message - From: S. Sharrieff Alimailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: UnivCity@list.purple.commailto:UnivCity@list.purple.com Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2007 8:42 PM Subject: [UC] Trees on 4500 Walnut Street

Re: [UC] Trees on 4500 Walnut Street

2007-04-24 Thread SKnight
ho hum - Original Message - From: UNIVERSITY*CITOYENmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Univcitymailto:Univcity@list.purple.com Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2007 12:32 PM Subject: Re: [UC] Trees on 4500 Walnut Street S. Sharrieff Ali wrote: Now we have something valuable

Re: [UC] Trees on 4500 Walnut Street

2007-04-24 Thread SKnight
Subject: Re: [UC] Trees on 4500 Walnut Street I'm not one for litigation so much, but there needs to be some recourse here. If there is writing or photos or even witnesses who saw the contractors sawing roots, they need to be brought to task and something needs to be made right

Re: [UC] Trees on 4500 Walnut Street

2007-04-24 Thread SKnight
] To: UnivCity@list.purple.commailto:UnivCity@list.purple.com Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2007 7:27 PM Subject: RE: [UC] Trees on 4500 Walnut Street Someone private-mailed me and accused me of dime-dropping on the whoever with LI and asked me to post a clarification. I don't plan to dime

RE: [UC] Trees on 4500 Walnut Street (brushes with death)

2007-04-23 Thread Kyle Cassidy
@list.purple.com Subject: Re: [UC] Trees on 4500 Walnut Street One day I was was walking along Baltimore Avenue in Clark Park when -- wham! I turned around and saw a huge tree branch from an ageing London plane, as thick as a human body, had crashed down on the sidewalk. A woman was standing near

Fwd: [UC] Trees on 4500 Walnut Street - Ordinance Guidelines - Don't Snitch?

2007-04-23 Thread pmuyehara
PROTECTED] To: UnivCity@list.purple.com Sent: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 11:44 PM Subject: Re: [UC] Trees on 4500 Walnut Street - Ordinance Guidelines - Don't Snitch? In a message dated 4/22/2007 7:29:30 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Someone private-mailed me and accused me

RE: [UC] Trees on 4500 Walnut Street - Ordinance Guidelines - Don't Snitch?

2007-04-23 Thread S. Sharrieff Ali
become you. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2007 11:44 PM To: UnivCity@list.purple.com Subject: Re: [UC] Trees on 4500 Walnut Street - Ordinance Guidelines - Don't Snitch? In a message dated 4/22

Re: [UC] Trees on 4500 Walnut Street (brushes with death)

2007-04-23 Thread UNIVERSITY*CITOYEN
S. Sharrieff Ali wrote: I had an incident a few years ago with a neighbor’s tree he cemented around the base, the tree later fell and destroyed my fence! Anthony West wrote: One day I was was walking along Baltimore Avenue in Clark Park when -- wham! I turned around and saw a huge tree

RE: [UC] Trees on 4500 Walnut Street

2007-04-23 Thread KAREN ALLEN
From: S. Sharrieff Ali [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: S. Sharrieff Ali [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: UnivCity@list.purple.com Subject: RE: [UC] Trees on 4500 Walnut Street Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 19:27:49 -0400 Someone private-mailed me and accused me of dime-dropping on the whoever with LI and asked me

Re: [UC] Trees on 4500 Walnut Street

2007-04-23 Thread KAREN ALLEN
PROTECTED],Univcity Univcity@list.purple.com Subject: Re: [UC] Trees on 4500 Walnut Street Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 19:58:51 -0400 So WAS someone killed or was someone NOT killed? You might want to clarify. Husband and an unborn child sounds like someone was killed to me. Phil

RE: [UC] Trees on 4500 Walnut Street

2007-04-23 Thread Kyle Cassidy
It's not the first time, there have been complaints on the list previously about LI being called about trash violations and other times people have complained that neighbors snitched on their off-leash dogs. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On

RE: [UC] Trees on 4500 Walnut Street

2007-04-23 Thread KAREN ALLEN
From: Kyle Cassidy [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [UC] Trees on 4500 Walnut Street Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 14:41:53 -0400 It's not the first time, there have been complaints on the list previously about LI being called about trash violations and other times people have complained

Re: [UC] Trees on 4500 Walnut Street

2007-04-23 Thread Krfapt
From: Kyle Cassidy [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [UC] Trees on 4500 Walnut Street Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 14:41:53 -0400 It's not the first time, there have been complaints on the list previously about LI being called about trash violations and other times people have complained

Re: [UC] Trees on 4500 Walnut Street

2007-04-22 Thread Mike VanHelder
I think it far more likely that the guys that did the sidewalk simply chopped through all of the tree roots on that side of the tree, thus destabilizing them and making them helpless to resist the high winds of the storm. This theory is supported by the fact that when the trees fell, the roots

RE: [UC] Trees on 4500 Walnut Street

2007-04-22 Thread S. Sharrieff Ali
:48 PM To: UnivCity@list.purple.com Subject: Re: [UC] Trees on 4500 Walnut Street Wasn't the new sidewalk cement done in the last month? That would hardly seem an adequate amount of time. Regards, John Ellingsworth S. Sharrieff Ali wrote: So.I have a theory about what happened to the trees

RE: [UC] Trees on 4500 Walnut Street

2007-04-22 Thread S. Sharrieff Ali
Of Lewis Mellman Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2007 11:03 AM To: UnivCity@list.purple.com Subject: Re: [UC] Trees on 4500 Walnut Street I heard the same explanation that Mike has for this from one of my local tree hugging friends. Undersized tree pits/openings in pavement are a real problem for many

Re: [UC] Trees on 4500 Walnut Street

2007-04-22 Thread John Ellingsworth
To: John Ellingsworth Cc: UnivCity@list.purple.com Subject: Re: [UC] Trees on 4500 Walnut Street I think it far more likely that the guys that did the sidewalk simply chopped through all of the tree roots on that side of the tree, thus destabilizing them and making them helpless to resist

Re: [UC] Trees on 4500 Walnut Street

2007-04-22 Thread UNIVERSITY*CITOYEN
Mike VanHelder wrote: I think it far more likely that the guys that did the sidewalk simply chopped through all of the tree roots on that side of the tree, thus destabilizing them and making them helpless to resist the high winds of the storm. This theory is supported by the fact that when the

Re: [UC] Trees on 4500 Walnut Street

2007-04-22 Thread Lewis Mellman
I heard the same explanation that Mike has for this from one of my local tree hugging friends. Undersized tree pits/openings in pavement are a real problem for many street trees because the roots need a border of permeable surface around the trunk to absorb rain water. Drought periods

Re: [UC] Trees on 4500 Walnut Street

2007-04-22 Thread UNIVERSITY*CITOYEN
S. Sharrieff Ali wrote: Now we have something valuable for the local zoning committees to look at. or maybe something valuable for uc green to look into (pruning and thinning). .. UNIVERSITY*CITOYEN [aka laserbeam®] [aka ray] SERIAL LIAR. CALL FOR RATES.

RE: [UC] Trees on 4500 Walnut Street

2007-04-22 Thread Kyle Cassidy
Several Stonely Court residents reported on the West Philly livejournal group that when the sidewalk was replaced contractors sawed through the roots that were buckling the pavement and removed them so that the new sidewalk would lay flat. One of them said that she went outside and spoke to the

Re: [UC] Trees on 4500 Walnut Street

2007-04-22 Thread Philip Forrest
I'm not one for litigation so much, but there needs to be some recourse here. If there is writing or photos or even witnesses who saw the contractors sawing roots, they need to be brought to task and something needs to be made right. Those trees stood for decades without falling. 2 months of

RE: [UC] Trees on 4500 Walnut Street

2007-04-22 Thread Kyle Cassidy
. Sharrieff Ali Cc: 'Mike VanHelder'; 'John Ellingsworth'; UnivCity@list.purple.com Subject: Re: [UC] Trees on 4500 Walnut Street What a shame; the block really looks bare ... and cementy. Regards,

RE: [UC] Trees on 4500 Walnut Street

2007-04-22 Thread S. Sharrieff Ali
Woops! Another crime of omission. S -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike VanHelder Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2007 6:11 AM To: John Ellingsworth Cc: UnivCity@list.purple.com Subject: Re: [UC] Trees on 4500 Walnut Street I think it far

RE: [UC] Trees on 4500 Walnut Street

2007-04-22 Thread S. Sharrieff Ali
else knows and post sooner. S -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Philip Forrest Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2007 12:51 PM To: UNIVERSITY*CITOYEN Cc: Univcity Subject: Re: [UC] Trees on 4500 Walnut Street I'm not one for litigation so much

RE: [UC] Trees on 4500 Walnut Street

2007-04-22 Thread S. Sharrieff Ali
, April 22, 2007 6:11 AM To: John Ellingsworth Cc: UnivCity@list.purple.com Subject: Re: [UC] Trees on 4500 Walnut Street I think it far more likely that the guys that did the sidewalk simply chopped through all of the tree roots on that side of the tree, thus destabilizing them and making

RE: [UC] Trees on 4500 Walnut Street

2007-04-22 Thread S. Sharrieff Ali
Someone private-mailed me and accused me of dime-dropping on the whoever with LI and asked me to post a clarification. I don't plan to dime-drop on anyone, not my place. I plan to check with LI to see what the regulations are, what forms are used. I keep seeing sidewalks with cement all

Re: [UC] Trees on 4500 Walnut Street

2007-04-22 Thread Philip Forrest
Also, I happen to know of a woman who lost her husband and unborn child due to a tree falling on the car her family was riding in, she was seriously injured but lived. Not a happy picture. It was just lucky the trees didn't kill anyone. So WAS someone killed or was someone NOT killed? You

Fwd: [UC] Trees on 4500 Walnut Street

2007-04-22 Thread pmuyehara
7:27 PM Subject: RE: [UC] Trees on 4500 Walnut Street Someone private-mailed me and accused me of “dime-dropping” on the “whoever” with LI and asked me to post a clarification. I don’t plan to “dime-drop” on anyone, not my place. I plan to check with LI to see what the regulations

Re: Fwd: [UC] Trees on 4500 Walnut Street

2007-04-22 Thread Philip Forrest
, baby carriages, etc? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: UnivCity@list.purple.com Sent: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 7:27 PM Subject: RE: [UC] Trees on 4500 Walnut Street Someone private-mailed me and accused me of “dime-dropping” on the “whoever” with LI and asked me to post

Re: [UC] Trees on 4500 Walnut Street

2007-04-22 Thread Lewis Mellman
with LI about it SA. -Lew From: Philip Forrest [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Philip Forrest [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: S. Sharrieff Ali [EMAIL PROTECTED],Univcity Univcity@list.purple.com Subject: Re: [UC] Trees on 4500 Walnut Street Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 19:58:51 -0400 Also, I happen to know

RE: [UC] Trees on 4500 Walnut Street

2007-04-22 Thread S. Sharrieff Ali
fell they would have sustained injuries and may have been killed. S -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lewis Mellman Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2007 8:25 PM To: Univcity@list.purple.com Subject: Re: [UC] Trees on 4500 Walnut Street

Re: [UC] Trees on 4500 Walnut Street

2007-04-22 Thread Anthony West
One day I was was walking along Baltimore Avenue in Clark Park when -- wham! I turned around and saw a huge tree branch from an ageing London plane, as thick as a human body, had crashed down on the sidewalk. A woman was standing near me, staring at the branch in a daze. About six seconds

Re: [UC] Trees on 4500 Walnut Street - Ordinance Guidelines - Don't Snitch?

2007-04-22 Thread Craigsolve
In a message dated 4/22/2007 7:29:30 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Someone private-mailed me and accused me of “dime-dropping” on the “whoever ” with LI and asked me to post a clarification. Are you stating a participant on this listserv tried to intimidate you

Re: [UC] Trees on 4500 Walnut Street - Ordinance Guidelines - Don't Snitch?

2007-04-22 Thread Elizabeth F Campion
Dear Craig, Thanks for the info, but it might be important to know that the city does not cede the right of walkway to the existence of or desire for trees. Most residential blocks in the city require a paved walkway that is 5' wide. Many commercial blocks require more width. The largest

[UC] Trees on 4500 Walnut Street

2007-04-21 Thread S. Sharrieff Ali
So.I have a theory about what happened to the trees on the 4500 block of Walnut Street which fell during the storm last week. If I am not mistaken, the tree-pits where not adequate for the trees to receive water after the new sidewalk cement job was completed. I have seen it happen in the past,

Re: [UC] Trees on 4500 Walnut Street

2007-04-21 Thread John Ellingsworth
Wasn't the new sidewalk cement done in the last month? That would hardly seem an adequate amount of time. Regards, John Ellingsworth S. Sharrieff Ali wrote: So.I have a theory about what happened to the trees on the 4500 block of Walnut Street which fell during the storm last week. If I am