lding hands. I'm very
excited!
- Original Message -
From: "UNIVERSITY*CITOYEN" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "University City List"
Sent: Friday, February 29, 2008 5:16 PM
Subject: Re: [UC] Waiting for the lawyers?
Glenn wrote:
What absolute nonsense! After
Glenn wrote:
What absolute nonsense! After we finally had an open public forum and
the neighborhood voiced massive opposition, the zoning committee is
going to wait for a private deal! If Lussenhop cuts a deal, the many
community members opposition is irrelevant! ..
What does any private de
In a message dated 2/28/2008 11:23:51 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
"If we don't take on the
>> challenge of helping to redevelop our part of the city,
>> nobody else is going to do it as well as we are going to do
>> it."
If we weren't already painfully familiar w
Re: [UC] Waiting for the lawyers?>> "The future of Penn depends on the future
of Philadelphia,"
>> says Penn President Amy Gutmann. "If we don't take on the
>> challenge of helping to redevelop our part of the city,
>> nobody else is going to do it a
Wow. Says it all, don¹t it?
On 2/27/08 9:17 PM, "Frank" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>> >> "The future of Penn depends on the future of Philadelphia,"
>>> >> says Penn President Amy Gutmann. "If we don't take on the
>>> >> challenge of helping to redevelop our part of the city,
>>> >> nobody
"The future of Penn depends on the future of Philadelphia,"
says Penn President Amy Gutmann. "If we don't take on the
challenge of helping to redevelop our part of the city,
nobody else is going to do it as well as we are going to do
it."
Um...
You are receiving this because you are subsc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The parties who seem to be oblivious to what's happening here are
hurting their own future prospects in this neighborhood by continuing to
press this project. If Tom wants to do another project here, it will be
greeted with great skepticism by the people in the area bec
This whole project was doomed from the start, by the same type of thinking
that sent several past initiatives in this neighborhood into oblivion. Namely,
a poorly conceived plan by people who greatly underestimated the resolve of
the overwhelming majority of the people in the community to pre
Neighbors,
I read Mary Nixon's letter in the UC Review. She makes good points about the
role of SHCA.
I don't think anyone on the list has discussed the stance taken by SHCA zoning
committee as stated by UCD Board member Barry Grossbach on Feb. 13; we are
going to wait until the lawyers decide
