In a message dated 6/7/2007 10:36:17 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
A question remains about the person who posted about it to our listserv.
A desperate attempt at diverting attention from the real issue -- namely the
apparent discontent with UCD shown at the meetin
In a message dated 6/7/07 10:59:51 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> In a message dated 6/7/2007 10:36:17 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> A question remains about the person who posted about it to our listserv.
>
> A desperate attempt at diverting attention from the r
In a message dated 6/7/2007 11:05:27 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Who Committeeman7 is, has not.
What's the relevance? The posting on our little list had nothing to do with
what happened at the meeting.
Al
** See what's free
I'd say it's relevant because:
1) committeeman7 aparantly had insider knowledge about what was going to
happen at the meeting. What they posted
was, it seems, exactly what happened at the meeting.
2) when Glenn was falsely accused about being the poster and there
was SIGNIFICANT fallout, c
> In a message dated 6/7/2007 11:05:27 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Who Committeeman7 is, has not [been clarified].
>
>
In a message dated 6/7/07 12:06:01 PM, Krfapt writes:
> What's the relevance? The posting on our little list had nothing to do
> with what happene
om: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2007 11:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; UnivCity@list.purple.com
Subject: Re: So, who is Committeeman7? [was: Re: [UC] Blackwell calls to
save Fenton's...
In a message dated 6/7/07 10:5
om: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2007 11:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; UnivCity@list.purple.com
Subject: Re: So, who is Committeeman7? [was: Re: [UC] Blackwell calls to
save Fenton's...
In a message dated 6/7/07 10:5
I Googled Committeeman7 and did not find anything.
Jim Cummings
On 6/7/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Tony, thank you for this thorough and important update. A question remains
about the person who posted about it to our listserv.
My guess, now, is that our anonymous poster,
I believe the Councilwoman was sincere when she said on Tuesday she had not yet
made up her mind whether to attend First Thursday at all. Close of session is a
very busy time for Council Persons. So while the anonymous poster may have had
some connection with her organization, I don't believe he
I prefer attribution, but I understand why someone might not want to
expose themselves to the rampant paranoia, profligate speculation and
general nastiness that began to swirl around the 'offending' post, long
before a beginner might have twigged to list etiquette (or not) or a more
adept sender m
On 6/7/07, Elizabeth F Campion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I prefer attribution, but I understand why someone might not want to
expose themselves to the rampant paranoia, profligate speculation and
general nastiness that began to swirl around the 'offending' post, long
before a beginner might ha
11 matches
Mail list logo
