On 2015-08-28 10:28, Richmond wrote:
https://help.github.com/articles/which-remote-url-should-i-use/#cloning-with-https-recommended
When you view a repository while signed in to your account
First of all, where do I find the GIT interface on my computer so that
I can log into it, or,
for the
On 2015-08-29 04:43, Kay C Lan wrote:
Oh, and just a slight tangent.
I've seen it mentioned before but it hadn't really registered until I
was
playing with LC8 yesterday, but the new 'Script only Stack' would seem
to
be the perfect beast to offer up as a guinea pig for Text Editor
On 08/29/2015 10:04 AM, Peter TB Brett wrote:
On 2015-08-28 10:28, Richmond wrote:
https://help.github.com/articles/which-remote-url-should-i-use/#cloning-with-https-recommended
When you view a repository while signed in to your account
First of all, where do I find the GIT interface on
That URL is not working. Probably should be:
http://forums.livecode.com/viewtopic.php?f=66t=25065p=130099hilit=scriptOnly#p130099
Peter
On Aug 29, 2015, at 12:53 AM, Monte Goulding mo...@sweattechnologies.com
wrote:
scriptOnly
___
If you are*NOT* interested in teaching *small children* /LiveCode/ stop
reading now.
---
Having taught a reasonably successful, relatively intensive course to
*Primary level**
Hi Peter
Has anyone seen my post on the engine forum about a scriptOnly property for
stacks:
http://forums.livecode.com/viewtopic.php?f=66t=25065
Happy to contribute it
Cheers
Monte
Sent from my iPhone
On 29 Aug 2015, at 5:00 pm, Peter TB Brett peter.br...@livecode.com wrote:
Your
In line with a recent post I made mention of the fact that I don't use Red
Dot breakpoints as they are ignored too often. I know others have had
similar complaints. But in the interest of seeing if improvements have been
made I just had a go in LC 7.1 rc 1 on OS X 10.9.5 and made the following
On 2015-08-29 08:53, Monte Goulding wrote:
Hi Peter
Has anyone seen my post on the engine forum about a scriptOnly
property for stacks:
http://forums.livecode.com/viewtopic.php?f=66t=25065
Happy to contribute it
This looks like the sort of thing that's best off being looked at by
Mark
Richmond,
Your concerns are very valid, with LC still in the midst of lots of changes.
Here are some immediate rambling thoughts, perhaps obvious, but for what
they're worth
I like the workbook format. Very appropriate.
Ideally, it might be distributed as an ebook or app type book that can
Kay C Lan wrote:
In line with a recent post I made mention of the fact that I don't
use Red Dot breakpoints as they are ignored too often. I know others
have had similar complaints. But in the interest of seeing if
improvements have been made I just had a go in LC 7.1 rc 1 on OS X
10.9.5
I'm still in the early days of using the sts plugin but I believe the
restriction on not having the script editor window open at the same time is
to avoid clashes if edits are made to the same script in both places.
On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 9:15 AM Richard Gaskin ambassa...@fourthworld.com
wrote:
On 08/29/2015 03:53 AM, Kay C Lan wrote:
repeat with x = 1 to 10
add 1 to x
end repeat
beep
It's really not a good idea to try to mess with the loop index while
it's running. Do this instead:
put 1 into y
repeat with x = 1 to 10
add 1 to y
end repeat
beep
and set the break
Kay C Lan wrote:
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 10:46 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Kay C Lan wrote:
a better mechanism to track the changes and transfer those back and
forth - that improvement can only be done from the mothership.
What's needed?
Let's make it so.
Love the positive attitude :-)
Hi All:
I'm struggling to to do some converting of Unicode icon font characters
and am lost in number formats and representations. For example, a
character can be represented in these forms:
Decimal: 58880
Unicode: E600
HTML: #58880;
CSS: \f230
Does anyone know how the CSS number is derived?
Mark Wieder wrote:
On 08/29/2015 03:53 AM, Kay C Lan wrote:
repeat with x = 1 to 10
add 1 to x
end repeat
beep
It's really not a good idea to try to mess with the loop index while
it's running. Do this instead:
put 1 into y
repeat with x = 1 to 10
add 1 to y
end repeat
beep
Good
On 08/29/2015 09:43 PM, Scott Rossi wrote:
Hi All:
I'm struggling to to do some converting of Unicode icon font characters
and am lost in number formats and representations. For example, a
character can be represented in these forms:
Decimal: 58880
Unicode: E600
HTML: #58880;
CSS: \f230
Does
On 08/29/2015 10:23 PM, Richmond wrote:
On 08/29/2015 09:43 PM, Scott Rossi wrote:
Hi All:
I'm struggling to to do some converting of Unicode icon font characters
and am lost in number formats and representations. For example, a
character can be represented in these forms:
Decimal: 58880
On 29 Aug 2015, at 10:22 pm, Peter TB Brett peter.br...@livecode.com wrote:
This looks like the sort of thing that's best off being looked at by Mark
Waddingham. Unfortunately my last day before my annual holiday is the day
before he gets back from his annual holiday, so I'm not going to
On 2015-08-29 23:05, Monte Goulding wrote:
On 29 Aug 2015, at 10:22 pm, Peter TB Brett peter.br...@livecode.com
wrote:
This looks like the sort of thing that's best off being looked at by
Mark Waddingham. Unfortunately my last day before my annual holiday
is the day before he gets back from
On 08/29/2015 03:53 AM, Kay C Lan wrote:
I expected to find a Bug Report at the QCC but nothing stuck out. I know
that this has been a long standing issue so can:
a) you confirm that you see this too
b) suggest an appropriate bug number to add my findings.
That said, the way LiveCode deals
Mark Wieder wrote:
The oddest part to me is that there's already a mechanism in the
engine for dealing with this, but the IDE doesn't use it.
What is that mechanism?
--
Richard Gaskin
Fourth World Systems
Software Design and Development for the Desktop, Mobile, and the Web
I agree that any scriptOnly property should be read-only, thus eliminating
any potential dire consequences. After all, you can easily lossily
scriptify a stack by creating a new script-only and setting the script to
another one.
Whilst I agree that the main use of script only stacks should be for
7.1.rc 1
I could have sworn this used to work:
make stack # Call it no. 1 utilities
create button
set traversalON of the button to false
on mouseUp
set the defaultstack to the topStack
put selectedChunk()
end mouseUp
set stack 1 to palette mode.
go to stack 2 with text in a field
Brahmanathaswami wrote:
7.1.rc 1
I could have sworn this used to work:
make stack # Call it no. 1 utilities
create button
set traversalON of the button to false
on mouseUp
set the defaultstack to the topStack
put selectedChunk()
end mouseUp
set stack 1 to palette mode.
7.1 rc(1)
I am trying to create some tools that can be used across many stacks. in
some cases it's not completely generic and I want to have functions
unique to scripts in the topstack to fire
e.g.
stack 1 : utilities.livecode # set to palette mode
stack 2: topstack: myProject.livecode
in
Seems like this has been the way it is in osx as long as I can remember,
but it does seem like the no traversal/palette tool stack would solve it.
Works fine in windows.
On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 2:23 PM, Richard Gaskin ambassa...@fourthworld.com
wrote:
Brahmanathaswami wrote:
7.1.rc 1
On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 1:56 AM, Mark Wieder mwie...@ahsoftware.net wrote:
It's really not a good idea to try to mess with the loop index while it's
running. Do this instead:
put 1 into y
repeat with x = 1 to 10
add 1 to y
end repeat
beep
and set the break condition on the 'add 1 to y'
Answering my own question:
Turns out there were two versions of the font I was looking at, with
characters ordered differently internally. [sigh] Nice waste of time and
loss of hair on this one.
Regards,
Scott Rossi
Creative Director
Tactile Media, UX/UI Design
On 8/29/15, 11:43 AM, Scott
Agreed... ideally it would be some how documented... otherwise the
presumption is if autotab is not checked for a field there is no reason
for the engine to insist that the cursor go there if the traversal is
true.
but, yes... there are bigger fish to fry.
--
Swasti Astu, Be Well!
Brahmanathaswami wrote:
Agreed... ideally it would be some how documented...
Ah, but that's the hard part: where?
For all I know it may even be documented already, but I can't imagine
where I might go to learn about it.
--
Richard Gaskin
Fourth World Systems
Software Design and
On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 11:47 AM, Kay C Lan lan.kc.macm...@gmail.com
wrote:
because the condtion isn't invalid but it...
because the condition isn't valid
or
because the condition is invalid
as you can see I even need a syntax checker for my own emails before I push
the Send button. No
On 30 Aug 2015, at 8:24 am, Peter TB Brett peter.br...@livecode.com wrote:
I *think* Mark will be back in the office on Monday, so he'll probably see
this exchange
At the moment I usually treat normal stacks and script-only stacks as totally
different things. I think of normal stacks
Did lots of script editing in Textmate today via stsMXL plugin. Saved
several times along the way, quit TextMate and Livecode. Next time I ran
Livecode, all my edits were gone. Maybe it needed a final save or
something but should have received warnings if so.
Back to the IDE SE for me
Peter Haworth wrote:
Did lots of script editing in Textmate today via stsMXL plugin. Saved
several times along the way, quit TextMate and Livecode. Next time I
ran Livecode, all my edits were gone. Maybe it needed a final save or
something but should have received warnings if so.
Back
I think I found a very obscure bug. i created another palatte stack with
my button... it works as expected.
So there is was something different about my my utilities stack... well
...it has a field object on it Monitor-log
this field had it's traversalOn set to true, autotab is off.
even
The next meeting of the SoCal LiveCode User Group is coming up on
Thursday, Sept 3 in Pasadena at 7PM.
IMPORTANT: The meeting is being held at our new location, Du-par's
Restaurant, on S. Lake Avenue near Cordova Street:
Du-par's Pasadena, back room
214 S. Lake Ave.
Pasadena, CA 91101
Brahmanathaswami wrote:
I think what is happening is: even though Auto tab is off, if you have
a field exposed on a card and go to that card the cursor jumps into
the field... not matter what mode the stack is in...
Should I report this?
I'm sure they're aware of it. The bigger question
37 matches
Mail list logo
