> Is there a way to force a reload of the bit you want (need) to reload,
> without reloading the engine ?
A reload doesn't reload the engine at any rate. To the contrary, it usually
just resets the standalone if the engine is (also on server) identical.
So reloading a standalone or loading
On 31/08/2019 14:52, Pi Digital via use-livecode wrote:
I absolutely agree with everything else Hermann states though. You
must set up your server to speed up download. But if you reload the
page manually you are effectively forcing it to ignore the cache and
download everything again. If
Yes, I meant "launch url in widget" which says it opens a url in the
widget, but that is what "set the URL of widget x" does too. I don't see
any difference.
I'm having a terrible time with both acceleratedRendering and the browser
widget in LC 9.5. I can't fix acceleratedRendering but I
Good work, thanks Mikey.
Sean Cole
Pi Digital Prod Ltd
> On 31 Aug 2019, at 22:27, Mike Kerner via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> OK, Mikey's 100% unofficial livecode hacktoberfest idea exchange repo is
> now live.
> https://macmikey.github.io/lc-hacktoberfest/
>
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at
OK, Mikey's 100% unofficial livecode hacktoberfest idea exchange repo is
now live.
https://macmikey.github.io/lc-hacktoberfest/
On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 11:22 PM Brian Milby via use-livecode <
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> Yes, very good idea. I got my first shirt last year.
>
>
Launch url is for opening an appropriate app for the url (text file, LiveCode
stack, phone number etc) as associated by your OS. A phone number might open
your phone app on a mobile device. A text doc might open MS Word.
Launch in widget is intended to open a webpage in the browser. Depending
> JLG wrote:
> What is the difference between "launch URL" and "set the URL" in a
> browser widget?
You probably mean load url which caches non-blocking,
contrary to set url.
There is also load url in widget which also sends you a message,
contrary to set url.
Launch url leaves LC and launches
I would mainly only use HTML5 deployment for Web Apps rather than web pages.
Much better to use some pre-made web template, Wordpress or learn and use
native HTML5 & CSS3.
I’m converting for my client two of his commercial desktop apps being used by
sales agents over to Web Apps as he is
What is the difference between "launch URL" and "set the URL" in a
browser widget?
--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com
HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
___
use-livecode mailing list
Hi hh,
I’m glad you are happy, and have found LC HTML5 useful
for what you are doing.
For my needs it was not up to the task, or simply just not
the correct tool for the job.
I can see how it can be good for small quick programs
for learning examples, and I’m glad it works for you.
Sorry, I do
Hi Bill,
You probably should have led with the fact that you are a Wordpress person.
LC supposedly plays nicely with Wordpress. Maybe someone can point him
to the Wordpress videos/resources from a couple years ago? (Is it a
Wordpress plug-in or what? I don’t remember.)
LC Server is much nicer
I always like it when you give these well thought replies, Richard.
Opposed to me, i flap some things out sometimes too quick.
Op 31-8-2019 om 19:19 schreef Richard Gaskin via use-livecode:
William Prothero wrote:
> ...I’m wondering whether it might be easier and better to just use
> the
William Prothero wrote:
> ...I’m wondering whether it might be easier and better to just use
> the engine as a cgi and do everything in css and html.
Yes.
On the sever, LC makes as good a choice for CGIs as nearly anything else.
On the client there are many options, including browser-native
> Rick H. wrote:
> LC HTML5 engine in my opinion isn’t practical for many of the
> reasons other’s have stated...
> ... What does work for making websites/webpages is:
> Apache 2.x, LC Server, databases such as PostgreSQL,
> non-LC HTML5, and CSS.
I have made with nearly every progress in the
Folks,
Thanks for your thoughts on LC HTML5 for web pages. I use LC increasingly only
for my own projects, even though I own a commercial license. I’m retired and
give away any education applications that I create. For simple web page
projects, though, I start with WordPress. There is a lot of
Hi Bill,
LC HTML5 engine in my opinion isn’t practical for many of the
reasons other’s have stated. It wasn’t created with the idea
that it was going to help you to create webpages. (That was
what I originally thought it would be used for, so you are not
alone in making that assumption.)
It
> On 31 Aug 2019, at 10:01, hh via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> The HTML5 deployment has its own problems. The biggest problem is
> that people use it for free and are not willing to buy (at least
> for a short period) the HTML5 license in order to support further
> LC development in that field
On 2019-08-31 04:41, Devin Asay via use-livecode wrote:
No, I’m just toying with the idea of having a 32-bit launcher that
would examine the host OS, then launch the proper executable based on
whether it is 32 or 64 bit. Sort of like a poor man’s universal app
like we used to create for MacOS.
Just uploaded the source code to "Sample Stacks":
[1] HTML5 Multi Windows (Focus-Move-Resize) v110
[2] HTML5 GoStackURL v100
[3] HTML5 Native Field v106
or use
http://livecodeshare.runrev.com/stack/945/ ... for [1]
http://livecodeshare.runrev.com/stack/947/ ... for [2]
The HTML5 deployment has its own problems. The biggest problem is
that people use it for free and are not willing to buy (at least
for a short period) the HTML5 license in order to support further
LC development in that field (but then moan about missing features).
So, also from that reason,
Below is some c code that will return the architecture on
OS X.
/* Determine the machine name, e.g. "x86_64". */
#include
#include
#include
#include
int main(int argc, const char * argv[]) {
size_t size;
sysctlbyname("hw.machine", NULL, , NULL, 0); // Get size of data to
be
21 matches
Mail list logo
