Yes Sean, that looks good!
Already when I see the table, I’m blind typing, trying the page up/down keys on
the keyboard, resizing the window while it is loading, trying to stress it…
Peter
> On Oct 8, 2019, at 10:21 PM, Brian Milby via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> I'll say that is a good job so
William Prothero wrote:
> Has anybody use LC for a wordpress plugin? Or perhaps a basic
> wordpress site could exist alongside the LC supported site.
I've considered it, but Wordpress' licensing made it incompatible with
my business goals.
Wordpress is GPL, and like Drupal and Joomla they're
Pi Digital wrote:
>> On 8 Oct 2019, at 21:42, Richard Gaskin wrote:
>>
>> And here is a May 2016 update:
>>
>>
https://livecode.com/trevor-devore-interviews-kevin-mark-on-infinite-livecode/
>>
>>
>> A small number of people keep going round and round on this a large
>> number of times.
>>
>> Ho
I'll say that is a good job so far. The grid is very responsive (but I am
using a pretty fast laptop). Second time to the page was much faster than
the first. And I'll agree that some of the corporate web apps that I have
to use can take time to get themselves ready for anything. Even the SAP
d
Folks:
I’m doing web stuff with php and Wordpress, and reading all of the postings
about LC’s HTML5 deployment. Since I have done a lot of programming of LC and
have a business license, it could be a lot easier to use LC in a server
environment than struggling with my minimal php skills.
The le
"Catalina is a girl's name of Spanish origin meaning 'pure'".
What a beautiful sounding name!
But MacOS Catalina is a pure killer. Killed my beloved LC 6/7
(I need for development of Raspi stacks) and sometimes need
for speed.
I learned LiveCode using LC 6 in 2013.
TMHO, LC 6.7.11 was the most co
> On 8 Oct 2019, at 21:42, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> And here is a May 2016 update:
>
> https://livecode.com/trevor-devore-interviews-kevin-mark-on-infinite-livecode/
>
>
> A small number of people keep going round and round on this a large number of
> times.
>
> How many
> On 8 Oct 2019, at 19:37, JJS via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> So that's why i say, the HTML5 export is a nice thing to experiment, but no
> visitor is going to return after the first time of long waiting, not even if
> the 2nd time is somewhat quicker
Again, this only potentially applies to t
When first connecting to a KIP plotter web portal it takes sometimes 20 to 30
seconds to load the page. Before that it's blank. What we need to do is stop
giving web devs right out of college the responsibility for creating web
portals. ;-) (Always blame it on them yungsters is my motto.)
Bob S
Lagi Pittas wrote:
> This is what I was talking about being treated like mushrooms - no
> communication as to what the future holds.- rough timescales
> as to when new or reassigned resources will be implemented - what
> is the intention with sqlite, 2d physics, Audio
>
> here is a 2014 upda
If you watch the movie a bit on the link i posted about the webapps, it
is quite interesting. Superfast loading, works on all platforms, on all
browsers. Pages and applications. Works even Offline via caches. All
your work is synced when going online again (in case you have a bad
connection or
On 10/8/2019 12:42 PM, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode wrote:
Pi Digital wrote:
> Forgive me for saying but, except the bounty idea, wasn’t this the
> whole point of it going open source - so that the community would
> fix bugs themselves!
Personally, I try to avoid making claims about othe
Pi Digital wrote:
> Forgive me for saying but, except the bounty idea, wasn’t this the
> whole point of it going open source - so that the community would
> fix bugs themselves!
Personally, I try to avoid making claims about other people's internal
motivations. Since I'm not them, such inf
Pi Digital wrote:
> I also don’t trust this statistic of 3 seconds. Count out 3 seconds
> and see if that feels uncomfortable to you to give up.
3 seconds is the shortest threshold I've seen suggested as critical.
But there's no debate on the principle in general: longer load times
lose users.
On 10/8/19 5:30 AM, Brian Milby via use-livecode wrote:
I’ve noticed it on that project as well, but have not narrowed down the
symptoms. I know that the definition is available at times and will need to
look at it. I have a project set up in Atom that makes searching the stack
only scripts
Hi All,
If I can interject here.
WHEN they have decided that they can add new resources (it used to be
people but now we are all commodities) or
reassign said resources to the LC branch rather than nearly all to the LC
for FM branch. If LCFM becomes the cash cow
then bugs will surely be fixed qui
Terry Judd wrote:
> On 8/10/19, 4:34 pm, J. Landman Gay wrote:
>
>> I think the politicking was a big factor in killing the voting
>> system. I remember many times when people would post to the list,
>> urging others to cast a vote for an issue so it would rise to
>> the top. Those voters may ne
Pi Digital wrote:
> If it’s coded in LCS, how will you submit the PR considering LC do not
> accept binaries.
With very few exceptions these days, most stacks throughout the IDE were
rewritten as script-only stacks specifically to facilitate collaborative
development.
--
Richard Gaskin
Fou
Small point on LCS... most things can probably be fixed by editing behavior
scripts and not binary files. If a binary file needs to be updated, you can
write a script to transform the binary and submit it (then a core team member
can review and apply the change).
I’ll agree that feature adds t
> On 8 Oct 2019, at 14:52, Mike Kerner via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> • insert delay while patrons enjoy the benefit of financing the fix
How does this bit work. If the PR has been submitted, how will others benefit
unless a build is released? Who would be responsible for that considering it’s
And as we know from past experience, the loading bar doesn't even have to
reflect the *actual* progress! ;-)
Bob S
> On Oct 8, 2019, at 04:45 , Pi Digital via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> That would be true for a ‘page’ that did not load in 3 sec but if you have a
> loading bar they would pro
i am so not being clear about this. i hate it when no one else understands
what i'm not saying.
i am not proposing a system that is either administered by LC or where LC
is involved in the work. what i am proposing is that all of us control
this process. it's our money, right? We propose the bo
I’ve noticed it on that project as well, but have not narrowed down the
symptoms. I know that the definition is available at times and will need to
look at it. I have a project set up in Atom that makes searching the stack
only scripts easy.
Thanks,
Brian
On Oct 8, 2019, 1:38 AM -0400, J. Lan
I really don't think so. Even with a loading bar, i aint gonna wait that long,
maybe just one time. In the 28K8 era we waited for +20minutes for a few
megabytes, because it was new. Now everyone is spoiled with fast internet and
always in a hurry. "Remember that 87.6543 % of statistics are made
For me this depends on the website.
For new unknown websites, let´s say i found the url by a google search, i would
not wait any longer than 3, maybe 5 seconds, even if a loading bar would show
up.
For websites i know or if i really have an important reason to visit them, i
would wait of cours
Hehe. That statistic is served by DoubleClick. Definitely NOT to be trusted!
It’s also self-serving to Google’s narrative. Click the link to drill down to
the source details and Safari blocks it as untrustworthy. Chrome doesn’t but
that’s because it’s made by Google!! 53% at 3 seconds indeed. Th
That would be true for a ‘page’ that did not load in 3 sec but if you have a
loading bar they would probably be more willing.
While developing for HTML5 I have to post up to the website and then refresh
the page to reload the whole thing which takes about 10 seconds. But even after
repeated ti
On 8.10.19 11:35, Richmond wrote:
"the severity of a bug be determined by the team"
Presumably by "the team" you mean LiveCode Central?
Somewhere in this discussion there was the idea that, perhaps, "the
team" already had so
much on their plate that both determining the severity of bugs and
"the severity of a bug be determined by the team"
Presumably by "the team" you mean LiveCode Central?
Somewhere in this discussion there was the idea that, perhaps, "the
team" already had so
much on their plate that both determining the severity of bugs and
sorting them out
were handled by pe
OK: I really need to clarify what I wrote there . . .
"if that were the case . . ."
What I meant is that, as far as I can see (pace Microsoft, Apple, et
al), software developers
release versions "into the wild" knowing that the chances of them being
100% bug-free is practically nil,
and relyi
30 matches
Mail list logo
