Re: Guessing the encoding of a test file...

On Mar 20, 2020, at 11:09 AM, Paul Dupuis via use-livecode wrote: > > Okay, now you going for the low blow :-)\ What part of “lawyer” wasn’t clear? B b :_) > Next, you'll be suggesting I need to check for EBCDIC encodings! That will be a start, but it’s not done until you include Baudot.

Re: Guessing the encoding of a test file...

On 3/20/2020 1:11 PM, doc hawk via use-livecode wrote: On Mar 19, 2020, at 1:31 PM, Paul Dupuis via use-livecode wrote: “ASCII" Wait, you’re not going to distinguish between six and seven bit ASCII? :_) Okay, now you going for the low blow :-) Next, you'll be suggesting I need to check

Re: Guessing the encoding of a test file...

On 3/20/2020 1:44 PM, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode wrote: I would be interested to learn more about the details of the subsequent refinements over the decade since, but also the ROI proposition for today: I'll try to remember to share the current code after this current review. I'm happy t

Re: Guessing the encoding of a test file...

kin, which while quite good, did > not cover as many test cases and the newer more robust one. The algo I wrote for you a decade ago was an amalgam of best efforts culled throughout this community at the time. It even included a variant, refined in our testing, of statistical analysis of certain

Re: Guessing the encoding of a test file...

27;re actually doing what you suggest. We had a set of QA test cases (text files in many different line endings and encodings), some intended to fail (such as Windows Code Page's we don't support). We're expanding these and doing a review on macOS and Windows with our app. Ones that fai

Re: Guessing the encoding of a test file...

On Mar 19, 2020, at 1:31 PM, Paul Dupuis via use-livecode wrote: > > “ASCII" Wait, you’re not going to distinguish between six and seven bit ASCII? :_) ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe,

Re: Guessing the encoding of a test file...

I know that Mozilla had a library for finding text decoding. I don’t think they use it anymore though. But I know it was translated into several other languages. It was called something like “universal character detection” or something equally sexy. Just typing out of my head, so it might be som

Re: Guessing the encoding of a test file...

hich while quite good, did not cover as many test cases and the newer more robust one. My main question to the list was: Has anyone out there ALSO written a guessEncoding function they might like to share or license? Why did I ask this? Because I am interested in comparing the accuracy of our cur

Re: Guessing the encoding of a test file...

If the files submitted to you do not need to retain their original formats for your purposes, why not just convert them all to a standard format? it's my understanding if you open the file using low level file commands without the binfile parameter, LC will convert the data into the local encodi

Re: Guessing the encoding of a test file...

Rather than throwing ‘the baby out with the bath water’ so to speak... What are the precise cases in which the method you have fails? And why do you expect it to work in those cases? Warmest Regards, Mark Sent from my iPhone > On 19 Mar 2020, at 20:32, Paul Dupuis via use-livecode > wrote:

Re: Guessing the encoding of a test file...

You won't want to hear this but unfortunately for Windows you are out of luck. Text files of themselves do not have the encoding embedded in them in any form. Once it is written it is stored as a series of one or two byte characters. If you open it as a binfile or a straight file it appears the sam

Re: Guessing the encoding of a test file...

Users of our application may use text files any whatever encoding their local system creates them in. We can not tell them to only create such files with a specific encoding. So, we need to detect the encoding of the text file the user selects. As I mentioned, I have an LC script that implemen

Re: Guessing the encoding of a test file...

On a mac it’s easy. Use file -I “MyFile.txt” as a shell script. On Windows it’s near impossible without running a whole bunch or arbitrary tests that may or may not be correct - certainly not accurate. What kind of text were you hoping to see? Was you looking for a particular encoding? If i

Guessing the encoding of a test file...

This has come up many times before, but I'll ask once again in case something has changed or someone new sees this. Does anyone have a routine that will take a filespec to a text file and return the guessed encoding of the text file? First, please don't respond with your should know the enc

Re: test - ignore

Jes. Bob S > On Mar 2, 2020, at 02:04 , Heather Laine via use-livecode > wrote: > > List restored again? > > > Heather Laine > Customer Services Manager > LiveCode Ltd > www.livecode.com > > > > > ___ > use-livecode mailing list > use-livecode

test - ignore

List restored again? Heather Laine Customer Services Manager LiveCode Ltd www.livecode.com ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://

Re: Sorry - test

There are websites on which you can check if your ip is registered as spammer. If so then you can request to have your ip removed. Some spam blocking mechanism use those kind of lists. Had it before on 2 websites i maintained, where people complaint getting refused due to this. Drs Mark Schonew

Re: Sorry - test

No problem Got it On Sat, Feb 15, 2020 at 13:01 Drs Mark Schonewille via use-livecode < use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > Problems with my IP and this list again. Testing. > > -- > Mark Schonewille > Economy-x-Talk > https://ecxtalk.nl > https://www.nt2.nu > > Programming LiveCode for the R

Sorry - test

Problems with my IP and this list again. Testing. -- Mark Schonewille Economy-x-Talk https://ecxtalk.nl https://www.nt2.nu Programming LiveCode for the Real Beginner http://www3.economy-x-talk.com/file.php?node=programming-livecode-for-the-real-beginner

Re: just a test...

And me! A little server indisposition, I presume... > Am 24.11.2019 um 20:15 schrieb Tore Nilsen via use-livecode > : > > As did I > > Regards > Tore Nilsen > >> 24. nov. 2019 kl. 20:04 skrev Brian Milby via use-livecode >> : >> >> I got this one >> >> Thanks, >> Brian >> On Nov 24, 2019,

Re: just a test...

As did I Regards Tore Nilsen > 24. nov. 2019 kl. 20:04 skrev Brian Milby via use-livecode > : > > I got this one > > Thanks, > Brian > On Nov 24, 2019, 1:21 PM -0500, Klaus major-k via use-livecode > , wrote: >> my last two mails do not show up here one the list? >> >> -- >> Klaus Major >> h

Re: just a test...

I got this one Thanks, Brian On Nov 24, 2019, 1:21 PM -0500, Klaus major-k via use-livecode , wrote: > my last two mails do not show up here one the list? > > -- > Klaus Major > https://www.major-k.de > kl...@major-k.de > > > ___ > use-livecode mailing

just a test...

my last two mails do not show up here one the list? -- Klaus Major https://www.major-k.de kl...@major-k.de ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription prefere

Re: Test

Not your fault, apparently cpanel updated automatically and broke mailman. Fixed now, apologies for the inconvenience. Regards, Heather Heather Laine Customer Services Manager LiveCode Ltd www.livecode.com > On 7 Nov 2019, at 09:29, Tiemo Hollmann TB via use-livecode > wrote: > > Hello,

Test

Hello, when answering on a post on this list, my answer is rejected with the following error: pipe to |/usr/local/cpanel/3rdparty/mailman/mail/mailman post use-livecode generated by use-livecode@lists.runrev.com local delivery failed w

Re: Livecode unit test harness?

Actually the exec-tests folder should probably be removed - that was our initial attempt at adding a test for each syntax variant while we were doing the refactoring project. They were translated at some point into the new test format at https://github.com/livecode/livecode/tree/develop/tests/lcs

Re: Livecode unit test harness?

ode. > > Is there a test harness where we can submit a stack to be in the unit test > set of tests that they use? > > Hypercard was hella reliable, I’d love for Livecode to be as reliable. > > Kee Nethery > ___ > use-liveco

Re: Livecode unit test harness?

On 10/2/19 12:05 PM, kee nethery via use-livecode wrote: I assume RunRev does unit tests for LiveCode. Is there a test harness where we can submit a stack to be in the unit test set of tests that they use? Hypercard was hella reliable, I’d love for Livecode to be as reliable. >> p

Livecode unit test harness?

I assume RunRev does unit tests for LiveCode. Is there a test harness where we can submit a stack to be in the unit test set of tests that they use? Hypercard was hella reliable, I’d love for Livecode to be as reliable. Kee Nethery ___ use-livecode

Re: Test post: Its awfully quiet around here...

As the LiveCode Forums allow one to include zipped files and images it might be that more users are migrating in that direction. Richmond. On 16.09.19 18:50, Mark Waddingham via use-livecode wrote: On 2019-09-16 16:22, Richmond via use-livecode wrote: Really . . . I can provide all the NOISE yo

Re: Test post: Its awfully quiet around here...

On 2019-09-16 16:22, Richmond via use-livecode wrote: Really . . . I can provide all the NOISE you want, but you may not like it. Love, kisses, abuse, Richmond. I'd expect nothing less from you Richmond :D Needless to say (I'd have thought, anyway...) - this was my attempt at a slightly mor

Re: Test post: Its awfully quiet around here...

Really . . . I can provide all the NOISE you want, but you may not like it. Love, kisses, abuse, Richmond. On 16.09.19 16:16, Mark Waddingham via use-livecode wrote: Testing... ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please vis

Re: Test post: Its awfully quiet around here...

@Mark This is the silence(*) that is the same as is with LC (without LCFM) since one year. What about *some* progress at least with • an up-to-date libbrowser/browser widget that *works* on latest OS of Mac/Win/linux(ubuntu)? • full keyboard and mouse events support in HTML standalones? • simp

Re: Test post: Its awfully quiet around here...

On 9/16/2019 9:16 AM, Mark Waddingham via use-livecode wrote: Testing... Not trying to be snide or anything, but I've been too busy posting bugs to the LC quality center and trying to get our 2 commercial applications onto LC905 to post much unless it is related to bugs.

Re: Test post: Its awfully quiet around here...

am via use-livecode > To: How to use LiveCode > Cc: Mark Waddingham > Sent: Mon, Sep 16, 2019 9:17 am > Subject: Test post: Its awfully quiet around here... > > Testing... > > -- > Mark Waddingham ~ m...@livecode.com ~ http

Re: Test post: Its awfully quiet around here...

I hear you, Mark. And yes it is. Craig -Original Message- From: Mark Waddingham via use-livecode To: How to use LiveCode Cc: Mark Waddingham Sent: Mon, Sep 16, 2019 9:17 am Subject: Test post: Its awfully quiet around here... Testing... -- Mark Waddingham ~ m...@livecode.com ~ http

Test post: Its awfully quiet around here...

Testing... -- Mark Waddingham ~ m...@livecode.com ~ http://www.livecode.com/ LiveCode: Everyone can create apps ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription pr

Re: Another list test

On Aug 29, 2019, at 7:40 AM, Bob Sneidar via use-livecode wrote: > > If an SMTP relay cannon contact the destination mail server, there usually is > a time period in which it will retry. By the time someone takes a cannon to a server, it’s usually to late to retry! :) — Richard E. Hawki

Re: Another list test

When my posts wouldn't send I got an error reply from my mail server about an "unknown user". So I don't think the list server ate the message, the post couldn't be delivered at all. -- Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com On Augu

Re: Another list test

>> On Aug 29, 2019, at 07:36 , Graham Samuel via use-livecode >> wrote: >> >> And another thing - my two test emails were not sent today but on 27th >> August, so they have been spinning about in cyberspace for a couple of days. >> Is this normal? >>

Re: Another list test

Was it bouncing the messages? How can we check if a message was sent/received during this time? Is there an archive we can view? Sean Cole *Pi Digital Productions Ltd* www.pidigital.co.uk +44(1634)402193 +44(7702)116447 'Don't try to think outside the box. Just remember the truth: There is no box!

Re: Another list test

On 8/29/19 8:26 AM, J. Landman Gay via use-livecode wrote: The list was down for 2 days due to the server move so there won't be any mail to restore. Right. But during that time the listserv just ate incoming emails, mine included. -- Mark Wieder ahsoftw...@gmail.com _

Re: Another list test

The list was down for 2 days due to the server move so there won't be any mail to restore. I think we all suffered from withdrawal symptoms. I myself was forced to read Twitter during the interim and I fear for my health now. -- Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com HyperActive Soft

Re: Another list test

If an SMTP relay cannon contact the destination mail server, there usually is a time period in which it will retry. Sometimes it can be as long as 2 or 3 days. Bob S > On Aug 29, 2019, at 07:36 , Graham Samuel via use-livecode > wrote: > > And another thing - my two test ema

Re: Another list test

And another thing - my two test emails were not sent today but on 27th August, so they have been spinning about in cyberspace for a couple of days. Is this normal? Graham > On 27 Aug 2019, at 13:00, Graham Samuel via use-livecode > wrote: > > For me there is a gap for 25 a

Re: Another list test

For me there is a gap for 25 and 26 August - absolutely nothing. Will posts from those dates reappear? Graham > On 27 Aug 2019, at 12:35, R.H. via use-livecode > wrote: > > I am still not receiving any message through email since last week. > > Roland > __

Test

I haven’t seen any mails from the list since 24 August. Just testing. Please ignore. Graham ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lis

Re: another list test

On Aug 27, 2019, at 7:51 AM, Dar Scott Consulting via use-livecode wrote: > > I still don't see this: > http://quality.runrev.com > > That’s because a side-effect of the outage is to render livecode impervio

Re: another list test

for next time: - Warn users - put sites offline -create back-up -transfer to new server -check if all is working -put it back online instead of how it looks now: transfer to new server pull the switch to put new server online aaah sh*t some sites not working ok another aaah stuff is m

Re: another list test

On 8/27/19 10:41 AM, Bob Sneidar via use-livecode wrote: Caching won't be an issue for you then. Not from a commandline, but locally, browsers do what they want. -- Mark Wieder ahsoftw...@gmail.com ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.

Re: another list test

Caching won't be an issue for you then. Bob S > On Aug 27, 2019, at 10:34 , Mark Wieder via use-livecode > wrote: > > I'm using Cloudflare's servers for DNS resolution. > > -- > Mark Wieder > ahsoftw...@gmail.com ___ use-livecode mailing list u

Re: another list test

On 8/27/19 8:16 AM, Mark Waddingham via use-livecode wrote: For example, for me, the IP address I get for quality.livecode.com is the new server, yet I see the old server's instance of bugzilla. In contrast at least half the team here just get a rather unfortunate error message - which is due

Re: another list test

o DNS Management to flush the cache. Bob S > On Aug 27, 2019, at 08:16 , Mark Waddingham via use-livecode > wrote: > > On 2019-08-27 11:04, Matthias Rebbe via use-livecode wrote: >> May i ask what is not working. >> I just did a quick test and searched for some bug r

Re: another list test

On 2019-08-27 11:04, Matthias Rebbe via use-livecode wrote: May i ask what is not working. I just did a quick test and searched for some bug reports. That was working w/o problems? In theory you should not be seeing that - for some reason that we cannot determine, the old server is still

Re: another list test

On 8/27/19 8:04 AM, Matthias Rebbe via use-livecode wrote: May i ask what is not working. I just did a quick test and searched for some bug reports. That was working w/o problems? Seems to be in a transitional state atm. My first try got a page full of perl compilation errors. Now I just

Re: another list test

Heather Laine Customer Services Manager LiveCode Ltd www.livecode.com > On 27 Aug 2019, at 16:04, Matthias Rebbe via use-livecode > wrote: > > May i ask what is not working. > > I just did a quick test and searched for some bug reports. That was working > w/o problems

Re: another list test

May i ask what is not working. I just did a quick test and searched for some bug reports. That was working w/o problems? Matthias Rebbe free tools for Livecoders: InstaMaker <https://instamaker.dermattes.de/> WinSignMaker Mac <https://winsignhelper.dermattes.de/> > Am 27.0

Re: another list test

On 8/27/19 7:51 AM, Dar Scott Consulting via use-livecode wrote: I still don't see this: http://quality.runrev.com It's even worse if you try https://quality.livecode.com/ -- Mark Wieder ahsoftw...@gmail.com ___ use-li

Re: another list test

But https://quality.livecode.com is online Matthias Rebbe free tools for Livecoders: InstaMaker WinSignMaker Mac > Am 27.08.2019 um 16:51 schrieb Dar Scott Consulting via use-livecode > mai

Re: another list test

I still don't see this: http://quality.runrev.com > On Aug 27, 2019, at 4:22 AM, Heather Laine via use-livecode > wrote: > > Hooray, we are back. Thanks to Robin's dedicated work and excellent detective > abilities in figuring out the problem. > > Apologies to

Re: another list test

LiveCodeShare will also return. As will anything else that has got lost or temporarily mislaid in transit. We're not trying to kill off anything here, quite the reverse. We're moving servers to improve our service. Best Regards, Heather Heather Laine Customer Services Manager LiveCode Ltd ww

Re: another list test

> Heather wrote: > Hooray, we are back. Thanks to Robin's dedicated work and excellent > detective abilities in figuring out the problem. > Apologies to all for the outage of the lists, they didn't make it > over correctly to our new server and diagnosing the issue was tricky! > > You can all now

Re: another list test

Got it. Sent from my iPad > On Aug 27, 2019, at 6:12 AM, Heather Laine via use-livecode > wrote: > > maybe this one arrives... > > > Heather Laine > Customer Services Manager > LiveCode Ltd > www.livecode.com > > > > > ___ > use-livecode maili

Another list test

I am still not receiving any message through email since last week. Roland ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mail

Re: another list test

Hooray, we are back. Thanks to Robin's dedicated work and excellent detective abilities in figuring out the problem. Apologies to all for the outage of the lists, they didn't make it over correctly to our new server and diagnosing the issue was tricky! You can all now go about your business ag

Re: another list test

I can read you loud an clearly. ;) Matthias Rebbe free tools for Livecoders: InstaMaker WinSignMaker Mac > Am 27.08.2019 um 12:12 schrieb Heather Laine via use-livecode > mailto:use-livecode@lists.runrev.com>>: > > maybe

another list test

maybe this one arrives... Heather Laine Customer Services Manager LiveCode Ltd www.livecode.com ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: ht

Re: test

Welcome back. ;) Matthias Rebbe > Am 29.07.2019 um 00:21 schrieb Drs Mark Schonewille via use-livecode > mailto:use-livecode@lists.runrev.com>>: > > Sorry for the somewhat anapproprate e-mail. After being unable to send e-mail > to the use list for about year, and apparently LiveCode.com >

Re: test

Sorry for the somewhat anapproprate e-mail. After being unable to send e-mail to the use list for about year, and apparently LiveCode.com being unable to solve the problem, I suddenly seem to be able to connect to the community again. Op 29-7-2019 om 00:17 schreef Drs Mark Schonewille via use-

test

tst ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode

Re: OT - Could someone with an Android phone do me a favour and test my website?

ne and modified my website. After >>> this modification i am able to see all text on all pages with an iPhone >> and >>> a Samsung S9. >>> >>> Unfortunately my customer still experience the problem. >>> >>> I would be very grateful if s

Re: OT - Could someone with an Android phone do me a favour and test my website?

t; a Samsung S9. > > > > Unfortunately my customer still experience the problem. > > > > I would be very grateful if someone with an Android phone could test my > > site at https://instamaker.dermattes.de < > https://instamaker.dermattes.de/> > > and would t

Re: OT - Could someone with an Android phone do me a favour and test my website?

all pages with an iPhone and a Samsung S9. Unfortunately my customer still experience the problem. I would be very grateful if someone with an Android phone could test my site at https://instamaker.dermattes.de <https://instamaker.dermattes.de/> and would tell me, if all text was displa

Re: OT - Could someone with an Android phone do me a favour and test my website?

Sony Xperia Z1 (Android 4.4.2): All is readable as wanted, Impressum starts at top, Disclaimer starts at bottom. ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription pref

Re: OT - Could someone with an Android phone do me a favour and test my website?

nd modified my website. After > > this modification i am able to see all text on all pages with an iPhone and > > a Samsung S9. > > > > Unfortunately my customer still experience the problem. > > > > I would be very grateful if someone with an Android phone cou

RE: OT - Could someone with an Android phone do me a favour and test my website?

13, 2019 4:22 PM To: How to use LiveCode Cc: Matthias Rebbe Subject: OT - Could someone with an Android phone do me a favour and test my website? Hi, yesterday i´ve received an email from a user who informed me that my website was not completely visible on his Samsung S7 Edge phone. Better said

Re: OT - Could someone with an Android phone do me a favour and test my website?

s > modification i am able to see all text on all pages with an iPhone and a > Samsung S9. > > Unfortunately my customer still experience the problem. > > I would be very grateful if someone with an Android phone could test my site > at https://instamaker.dermattes.de <

OT - Could someone with an Android phone do me a favour and test my website?

my website. After this modification i am able to see all text on all pages with an iPhone and a Samsung S9. Unfortunately my customer still experience the problem. I would be very grateful if someone with an Android phone could test my site at https://instamaker.dermattes.de <ht

Re: Test

gotcha :) > Le 18 sept. 2018 à 21:18, Clarence Martin via use-livecode > a écrit : > > This is a test because I can’t seem to send anything to the list. > > Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10 > > ___

Test

This is a test because I can’t seem to send anything to the list. Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10 ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsub

Re: Internet Date Service test

Thank you Mark, I’ll try it out. Peter > On Sep 14, 2018, at 9:24 PM, Mark Wieder via use-livecode > wrote: > > On 09/14/2018 08:30 PM, Peter Bogdanoff via use-livecode wrote: > > I’m not seeing how to translate use of an NTP server into "LC-talk.” I > > would love to use it but Google doesn

Re: Internet Date Service test

On 09/14/2018 08:30 PM, Peter Bogdanoff via use-livecode wrote: > I’m not seeing how to translate use of an NTP server into "LC-talk.” I would love to use it but Google doesn’t seem to have an API that I can access. And I would love the dependability of the Google universe. NTP uses port 13.

Re: Internet Date Service test

I’m not seeing how to translate use of an NTP server into "LC-talk.” I would love to use it but Google doesn’t seem to have an API that I can access. And I would love the dependability of the Google universe. This one does return JSON: http://worldclockapi.com What I

Re: Internet Date Service test

I'd rather use a time server that a lot of people use and is maintained. A private web server's clock depends on ...x for reference? "Google Public NTP serves leap-smeared time . We use this technology to smoothly handle leap seconds with no disruptive eve

Re: Internet Date Service test

You could put a little one line CGI on your server that just returns the time and date. -- Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com On September 14, 2018 8:47:51 PM Peter Bogdanoff via use-livecode wrote: Yes, that’s right. We had

Re: Internet Date Service test

how about google time? https://developers.google.com/time/ -- Stephen Barncard - Sebastopol Ca. USA - mixstream.org On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 6:45 PM, Peter Bogdanoff via use-livecode < use-livecode@lists.runrev.com> wrote: > Yes, that’s right. > > We had a report of a user setting back his OS da

Re: Internet Date Service test

Yes, that’s right. We had a report of a user setting back his OS date to extend his demo. This caused us much consternation, thus the desire for an independent date source. Peter > On Sep 14, 2018, at 5:56 PM, Brian Milby via use-livecode > wrote: > > I think the goal is an independent time

Re: Internet Date Service test

I think the goal is an independent time (date) source to ensure that the value is correct. I’m curious about the best solution. Probably would involve your own server though. Thanks, Brian On Sep 14, 2018, 7:36 PM -0500, Richard Gaskin via use-livecode , wrote: > Peter Bogdanoff wrote: > > > An

Re: Internet Date Service test

Peter Bogdanoff wrote: > And… if anyone has a method that doesn’t rely on the user’s local > date/time I’d like to hear that… Using "the seconds" returns a value that accounts for local GMT offset. with the value returned being for GMT. So if you get the seconds and then display them on a mac

Re: Internet Date Service test

That sounds plausible. I am getting uneven results with this… Is this a job for LC Server? To return the seconds and then do my calculations from that? Peter > On Sep 14, 2018, at 4:06 PM, Bob Sneidar via use-livecode > wrote: > > Also it dawns on me that the US Navy may firewall it's own t

Re: Internet Date Service test

Also it dawns on me that the US Navy may firewall it's own time servers so that they are no DOS attacked. Bob S > On Sep 14, 2018, at 15:58 , Bob Sneidar via use-livecode > wrote: > > While the USA does not firewall it's internet, there are countries that do. > Costa Rica may be one of the

Re: Internet Date Service test

While the USA does not firewall it's internet, there are countries that do. Costa Rica may be one of them. Bob S > On Sep 14, 2018, at 15:33 , Peter Bogdanoff via use-livecode > wrote: > > It seems to work well in on my computer and others in the USA, but a Windows > tester in Costa Rica c

Re: Internet Date Service test

> Windows tester in Costa Rica can’t seem to get a response. I haven’t > figured out if this is a programming or Internet issue, and it’s difficult > to determine since it works well for me on Mac and Windows. > > > > Would any of you test this small LC stack — in the USA or elsewh

Internet Date Service test

etermine since it works well for me on Mac and Windows. Would any of you test this small LC stack — in the USA or elsewhere? And send me results directly to my email address? https://artsinteractive-products.s3.amazonaws.com/MITA/Get_Julian_Date.livecode.zip <https://artsinteractive-pro

Re: Slow LC 9 Performance - Test Stack, Video, QA Report

PS - Alex, I see that when I modified the code I moved the timer and ended up timing the loading of the files, whereas you were timing the data comparison after loading! :) I'll try that tomorrow night. Good area for testing, interesting results. Best wishes, Curry K. ___

Re: Slow LC 9 Performance - Test Stack, Video, QA Report

Alex: > And I was encouraged to try a quick test - which turned out to be > a counter-example. LC9 is 4x faster than LC6 on this little test > (consistently over different photos). Thanks! This is a good test. Any counter-examples are great since they narrow down the problem areas.

Re: Slow LC 9 Performance - Test Stack, Video, QA Report

As to speed comparisons with LC 9: Compared to LC 8, LC Builder of LC 9 has an increase of 50-120% in speed. (Seen with timings when creating an LCD-scroller widget and an image widget). ___ use-livecode mailing list use-livecode@lists.runrev.com Pleas

RE: Slow LC 9 Performance - Test Stack, Video, QA Report

I have observed this also. I tested by putting an animated gif in front of a extremely hi-res test image. LC 8 choked but LC9 did not even breath hard. Ralph DiMola IT Director Evergreen Information Services rdim...@evergreeninfo.net -Original Message- From: use-livecode [mailto:use

Re: Slow LC 9 Performance - Test Stack, Video, QA Report

encouraged to try a quick test - which turned out to be a counter-example. LC9 is 4x faster than LC6 on this little test (consistently over different photos). *on mouseUp    local tData1, tData2, time1, temp    put URL ("binfile:/Users/alextweedly/Dropbox (Personal)/Pictures/2016/101_0818/IMG

Re: Slow LC 9 Performance - Test Stack, Video, QA Report

number of areas are affected, but who knows, maybe the root cause could be the same. Working on a WordLib update during the last few weeks has given me a good opportunity to observe the slowdown, because WordLib supports both LC 6 and 9, and it also requires thousands of tests with hundreds of docu

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >