I have a rev program running on one mac. I will call this the server. I have
another program running on another mac, I will call this remote, that make
reference calls to a stack on the server.
The remote program I am using the stackfile property to place the name of
the stack. Every thing works
Hi John,
I have a rev program running on one mac. I will call this the server.
I have
another program running on another mac, I will call this remote, that
make
reference calls to a stack on the server.
The remote program I am using the stackfile property to place the name
of
the stack.
Those of us cheap-jacks who are still developing with
unlicensed versions don't have access to the RR2 Alpha
builds.
However we can all glory in Klaus Major's Christmas tree
(see User Contributions) by opening it in Metacard 2.4.2
using my Bagic Mutton (shameless plug) also downloadable
from User
Hi Richmond,
a happy new year to you :-)
Those of us cheap-jacks who are still developing with
unlicensed versions don't have access to the RR2 Alpha
builds.
However we can all glory in Klaus Major's Christmas tree
Fortunately it will last at least until next christmas and will
definitevely
Guys! Please! take a look at the last digest that just arrived in my inbox.
More than half of it was Not Discussing Revolution. You've all had your say.
I've listened, laughed at some, torn my hair out at others, and now I'm
saying Subject Closed. If you still have strong feelings on how the list
Bernard Devlin wrote:
I would like to suggest that the policy of the list should be that off-topic
posts pushing religious, moral or political views are banned.
I suspect discussions of cheese and other comestibles may be unlikely to cause
much offence.
Bernard
I would like to
[snip]
Jim Hurley writes:
Bernard Devlin wrote:
I suspect discussions of cheese and other comestibles may be unlikely to
cause
much offence.
Bernard
... I am consoled by the thought that the early bird may get the worm, but
it is the second mouse who gets the cheese.
Jim Hurley
--
Hi,
I have a question about the method used to parse XML with Revolution 2.0.
Many of the XML parsers available for building applications are based on a
push technique that gathers all the information found in a well-formed XML
document and places it in some kind of nested array. The latest
Hi All,
My mystery of the day:
I'm testing a stack that has (visible) two groups and three individual fields.
If I select either group and start editing it, the last individual
field remains visible. If I copy/paste a group into a new stack,
only the grouped controls are moved; so why does
The question: Is there a way to set the line width of the box drawn
around text whose textStyle is box?
The request: It would be nice to be able to specify different
top/bottom colors for text whose textStyle is threeDBox, so that
threeDBoxed text will display differently than the field that
Le Thursday, 9 Jan 2003, à 03:46 US/Central, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a
écrit :
- FileMaker takes use of Unicode fonts, but we have to use special
CE-fonts for countries like Poland or Russia, because of the
special chars.
Normally you don't need Unicode for WE, CE or Cyrillic unless the
What specific features in Rev 2.0 would have made the difference for your
project's needs?
With the base cost of Director plus the cost of rewriting everything from
scratch, such a migration is an expensive option.
Granted, but I like Transcript much better than Lingo. Having come from a
Hi
I am creating an application that uses a plugin. I want to restrict the use
of the plug-in to the application that accompanies it. Uses by other rev
Stacks would not be allowed. The first part of this (determining under what
conditions the plugin will launch) I know how to do. The problem I
Tekpa,
I have put the following into the startUp handler in the mainstack of my
standalone:
if word 1 of the systemVersion is NT and word 2 of the systemVersion 5
then
put queryRegistry(HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Control Panel\Colors\MenuBar) into
tColor
answer tColor
if tColor then
put word
Amen! Lingo is just plain ugly by comparison.
I suspect you may be right about Macromedia's committment to Director as
well:
(1) Look how long it took them to get out an OSX version.
(2) Look at how much the two product lines of Flash and Director seem to
becoming either redundancy or merging
The new library provides a hook into the url status with the function
libUrlSetStatusCallback. You dont need to poll for url status (with
urlstatus), it updates itself and sends any message you desire.
You can try this button script:
on mouseUp
put url binfile:test.txt into url ftp://un:[EMAIL
On Friday, January 10, 2003, at 02:08 PM, Klaus Major wrote:
If you want some real applications, MC/RR is the only choice.
Not to throw water (or petrol) on it , but I do think that there have
been an application or two made with Director. Also, Director is on
version 9, RR has yet to
Hi Rob,
Sigh. Dare I say amen again?
Judy
On Fri, 10 Jan 2003, Rob Cozens wrote:
however, it leads to some interesting conjecture as to what it would
have been like to create those same applications in QuickTime
Interactive (aka HyperCard v3).
On Fri, 10 Jan 2003, Troy Rollins wrote:
Not to throw water (or petrol) on it , but I do think that there have
been an application or two made with Director. Also, Director is on
version 9, RR has yet to deliver version 2. Questioning Macromedia's
commitment to the product, and comparing it
I think I may have managed to get the longest crash-free period so far on a
small, simple application I built with Revolution by tweaking it last
Monday or Tuesday to set the Appearance Manager to OS Emulated, as many
discussions here have suggested. I run the application on OS 9. But now,
Folks, I am completely foxed by the following problem. I can't find
anything doing the Google searches or in the Revo documentation. So
apologies if this is a well-known issue which I have missed.
This problem shows up on two different Mac G3s running Revolution
1.1.1 under MacOS 9.2.2 (my
I guess I can do my own workaround for each stack design, but it requires some
bookkeeping/hassle. Some of the inheritance elegance is lost. (As an idealist,
things like this really chafe me.)
-- D
-Original Message-
From: Jeanne A. E. DeVoto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Recently, Graham Samuel wrote:
Folks, I am completely foxed by the following problem. I can't find
anything doing the Google searches or in the Revo documentation. So
apologies if this is a well-known issue which I have missed.
I've imported some stacks from SuperCard using the tools
on 1/10/03 4:40 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What happens if you set the destroyStack to true before closing the stack?
Also, what is the benefit of having a plug-in listed in the Plugins menu if
it cannot be run?
Richard,
Yes, this works!
Now as for the reason:
The
If the user has text in a field selected and presses a button that says
save this stack, then the stack crashes. If no text is selected and the
user presses the same button, then the stack does not crash, but saves
itself. Actually, to be truer to the script of the button, it says,
set cursor
First, an update about the irregularly-shaped buttons issue. Apparently,
if one simply uses a GIF with transparency, the transparent areas do not
respond to mouse events. This is my experience. Am I correct about this?
Second: I have some funny math going on. It's the same States Quiz. I'm
--- Wolfgang M. Bereuter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Donnerstag, Jänner 9, 2003, at 09:34 Uhr,
Troy Rollins wrote:
On Thursday, January 9, 2003, at 03:27 PM,
erik hansen wrote:
you are right.
And YOU are posting in HTML. ;-)
ich spreche kein HTML.
wass soll ich denn machen?
run inside a browser, there is nothing anywhere near as powerful as
ShockWave.
So true. Which makes the sweet smell of Death now lingering about Director
so disconcerting - and too familiar. OMO, HyperCard, ...
Jim Lambert
___
use-revolution mailing
Second: I have some funny math going on. It's the same States Quiz. I'm
trying to have the stack keep a running track of the number of correct
answers, the number of attempts, and then divide the former by the latter
and multiply by 100 for an accuracy percentage. For simple math, such as
3
On Friday, January 10, 2003, at 07:44 PM, Judy Perry wrote:
6/7 = 4286
(6/7)*100 = 85.714286
with the usual value of numberFormat.
Note that they both end in 4286.
Could you be using a short field with right justification? If that is
the case, maybe the left part of the answer is pushed
30 matches
Mail list logo
