t?
Greg Smith
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revol
ut it?
Greg Smith
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
--
View this mess
That is cheap!
Cheers,
Luis.
On 11 Oct 2006, at 6:50, Dan Shafer wrote:
I haven't used this product in some time and I'm not recommending
it but it
might be worth evaluation by some of the folks who are interested
in doing
multimedia work for which Rev is either overkill or not suited.
to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-
Comparison-of-Multimedia-tf2417422.html#a6749941
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabb
I haven't used this product in some time and I'm not recommending it but it
might be worth evaluation by some of the folks who are interested in doing
multimedia work for which Rev is either overkill or not suited.
MovieWorks;
http://www.movieworks.com
I know a couple of folks who swear by it f
A "2 minute dig" on the Apple website yielded the
following:
http://developer.apple.com/quicktime/quicktimeintro/tools/index.html
all these tools appear to be FREE !!!
so, cheap-jacks like me will look no further -
use these tools to knock my multimedia together and
then deliver either
IN a Run
Um, Andre, Apple and Quicktime:
Apple (unlike the image it sometimes tries to present
to its public) is a business largely interested in
making money - and, as such, has to listen to what
customers want . . .
Runtime Revolution is also a business . . .
Businesses like RR can, at least to a certa
high
>>> price tag.
>>> Now, how do they expect to get customers that way? Although,
>>> every review
>>> is favorable and Apple, itself, (herself, himself), uses this
>>> QuickTime
>>> dedicated software. Now, just casually conside
If you're looking to the iPod market:
Ever the cheapo me... Look at this: http://www.apple.com/quicktime/
tutorials/creatingvideo.html
QT pro is $30.
There are rumours about (and with the new releases having games and
all!) that the firmware may be updated to support QT VR, adding
interact
fr
Quite a nippy lil' app.
Then there's this cool freebie: emma3d dot org
I'm sure there's tons of others out there.
Cheers,
Luis.
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe
um roll... Javascript. Very cool app.
>>>
>>> The mTropolis wannabee 'Quickmedia'. omegaconcept dot fr
>>> Quite a nippy lil' app.
>>>
>>> Then there's this cool freebie: emma3d dot org
>>>
>>> I'm sure there&
ution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-
Comparison-of-Multimedia-tf2417422.h
On Oct 10, 2006, at 1:39 PM, GregSmith wrote:
Trevor:
Thanks very much for the explicit and detailed instructions. Not
being, by
any stretch of the imagination, a programmer, this will take me
quite some
time to digest. LiveStage, despite being very powerful in what it
can do, I
don't
receive the
QTDebugStr message which you can send form LiveStage using DebugStr. >>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Comparison-of-Multimedia-Prowess---Director-and-Revolution-tf2417069.html#a6744926
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list arch
Err... Isn't QT an apple product, apple should be the one trying port
the thing to Linux, not RR
On Oct 10, 2006, at 4:41 PM, Richmond Mathewson wrote:
and (cough, cough, cough) RR isn't exactly running to
help things in that direction.
___
us
Quicktime. . .
Of course (!!!) one of the good things about Runtime
Revolution (and, to be fair, Hypercard) is that if you
produce something with Quicktime you can then access
and control it via an RR front-end.
I would be wary, however, of QT, because I ,
personally, am developing for Debian-bas
On Oct 10, 2006, at 11:21 AM, GregSmith wrote:
Trevor:
Ideally, what I would like to make happen, but I don't think
Revolution
provides the tools to do this, is to provide links inside one
QuickTime
movie, while it is running, that will jump to a specific place in
another
movie, and provi
> use-revolution mailing list
> use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
>
>
--
View this mess
really difficult to
tap its power.
Thanks,
Greg Smith
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Comparison-of-Multimedia-Prowess---Director-and-Revolution-tf2418554.html#a6742468
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
Well for what it is worth, 2 points:
(admittedly based on 6 months work with Director 5
years ago)
1. Moving from Fortran, Basic, Pascal (blah, blah,
blah) to Hypercard
was a fairly smooth process (and hence into
Metacard and Runtime
Revolution) allowing me to produce something
effective
rence-able video
training, if you will. But having a card-based system that does the same
thing might just have to be good enough, especially in light of Kagi and its
KRM module.
Greg Smith
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Comparison-of-Multimedia-Prowess---Director-and-
hing along these lines . . . , well, maybe, never. It's just too much
work for any developer to add to their already huge list of things to do.
But, you did ask.
Greg Smith
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Comparison-of-Multimedia-Prowess---Director-and-Revolution
On Oct 10, 2006, at 10:28 AM, GregSmith wrote:
Trevor:
Currently, I don't own either Director or Revolution. To start
with, I need
to quickly put together an "application" that presents and links
various
QuickTime movies together in a logical fashion, complete with a
navigation
and link
Hi Greg,
It is true that Director has some out of the box features that makes
it easier to create things without coding. First of all the metaphor
is quite different. Director is a timeline tool, that allows
"tweening". You can set Keyframes for the objects and let director
perfor the tra
n
could easily be performed by potential purchasers of either software.
Greg Smith
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Comparison-of-Multimedia-Prowess---Director-and-Revolution-tf2417069.html#a6741367
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
On Oct 10, 2006, at 6:25 AM, Greg Smith wrote:
-- I'm still looking for the friendliest programming or non-
programming environment for
multimedia development. There does not exist a non-programmer's
solution, so here I am.
...
But my application goals are entirely in the realm of multime
Have you seen Norpath Elements? norpath dot com
It's a visual coding tool, but you can add additional Elements in
...drum roll... Javascript. Very cool app.
The mTropolis wannabee 'Quickmedia'. omegaconcept dot fr
Quite a nippy lil' app.
Then there's this cool freebie: emma3d dot org
I'm sure t
--
-- I'm still looking for the friendliest programming or non-programming
environment for
multimedia development. There does not exist a non-programmer's solution, so
here I am.
Recent exploration has revealed that Director no longer is pursuing a verbose
programming
solution, (Lingo), b
28 matches
Mail list logo
