sw_
sw_test3
NOTICE if you will, that lines 1 2 have 2 tabs together, and 3 does not. The
filter command here should give me just line 3 shouldn't it??
Perhaps I do not understand the filter command or regular expressions very
well, but the command reference
Bob-
Try
filter theDropData without * theFilter *
--
-Mark Wieder
mwie...@ahsoftware.net
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
have 2 tabs together, and 3
does not. The filter command here should give me just line 3
shouldn't it??
Perhaps I do not understand the filter command or regular
expressions very well, but the command reference seems to indicate
that I should filter out all the lines that do not contain
Dangit! I think I already asked this one a couple weeks ago! sigh I remember
now.
Bob
On Jun 2, 2010, at 3:20 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
Bob-
Try
filter theDropData without * theFilter *
--
-Mark Wieder
mwie...@ahsoftware.net
___
The filter command works on wildcards, not regex
Your filter definition = keep lines that are not exactly tabtab
You might be thinking
put * tab tab * into theFiliter
= which means keep lines that do not have at least two tabs in sequence
On Jun 2, 2010, at 3:18 PM, Bob Sneidar wrote:
Hi
How do you escape chars with the filter command? Specifically what do you do
if you want to filter lines that contain the * character?
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe
On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 8:59 AM, David Bovill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How do you escape chars with the filter command? Specifically what do you do
if you want to filter lines that contain the * character?
I replace them with something else, then filter, than change them back again.
e.g
I think this works as well?
filter shellResult with *[*]*
2008/5/26 Sarah Reichelt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 8:59 AM, David Bovill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
How do you escape chars with the filter command? Specifically what do you
do
if you want to filter lines
26, 2007, at 10:30 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
Joe-
Tuesday, June 26, 2007, 4:32:03 PM, you wrote:
Mark is the filter command anything at all like the snake command
Ummm... snake?
--
-Mark Wieder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
use-revolution mailing list
use
, Mark Wieder wrote:
Joe-
Tuesday, June 26, 2007, 4:32:03 PM, you wrote:
Mark is the filter command anything at all like the snake command
Ummm... snake?
--
-Mark Wieder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution
:
Joe-
Tuesday, June 26, 2007, 4:32:03 PM, you wrote:
Mark is the filter command anything at all like the snake command
Ummm... snake?
--
-Mark Wieder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit
some such thing and I just
haven't found it yet.
Joe Wilkins
On Jun 26, 2007, at 10:30 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
Joe-
Tuesday, June 26, 2007, 4:32:03 PM, you wrote:
Mark is the filter command anything at all like the snake command
Ummm... snake?
--
-Mark Wieder
[EMAIL PROTECTED
On 6/26/07 11:25 PM, Joe Lewis Wilkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the reminder Jacqui and Jim. Snake was probably a name I
gave it; perhaps not, but it did snake through all of the scripts.
I didn't realize that the Rev. Find and Replace... is that
versatile; but, then, I've never
Thanks, Jim. Glad to see you're hard at work close to midnight! I hit
the sack early, but am now up and at em.
Joe Wilkins
On Jun 26, 2007, at 11:51 PM, Jim Ault wrote:
On 6/26/07 11:25 PM, Joe Lewis Wilkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the reminder Jacqui and Jim. Snake was
I've always been curious about the filter command - and I am pretty sure
from examples I have seen that there is a lot more to it than is shown in
the docs.
Take this example from Jerry Daniels beautiful Galaxy:
filter someScript with [-ofsgOFSG][-nueNUE][ ntNT]*
What is the leading - doing
David Bovill wrote:
I've always been curious about the filter command - and I am pretty sure
from examples I have seen that there is a lot more to it than is shown in
the docs.
Take this example from Jerry Daniels beautiful Galaxy:
filter someScript with [-ofsgOFSG][-nueNUE][ ntNT]*
What
.
So this use of the filter command would yield any lines in a script
beginning with:
-- (comment used for handler folders)
on (command)
fun (function)
get (getProp)
set (setProp)
It also handles any irregularities with regard to upper/lower case.
That part may actually be slowing it down, now
David-
The filter command uses a subset of regex. I've got BZ #2805 filed to expand
the regex syntax used.
Jerry's regex string [-ofsgOFSG][-nueNUE][ ntNT]* is a great little
filter for scanning through scripts looking for handlers: it will catch
occurrences of lines starting with things like
Mark is the filter command anything at all like the snake command
we used to have available in HC? I've been wondering about how to
search for things in Rev the way I used to do in HC and this kind of
looked like it might be applicable.
Joe Wilkins
On Jun 26, 2007, at 4:17 PM, Mark Wieder
11:58 AM, David Bovill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've always been curious about the filter command - and I am pretty sure
from examples I have seen that there is a lot more to it than is shown in
the docs.
Take this example from Jerry Daniels beautiful Galaxy:
filter someScript
Joe-
Tuesday, June 26, 2007, 4:32:03 PM, you wrote:
Mark is the filter command anything at all like the snake command
Ummm... snake?
--
-Mark Wieder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit
Can anyone tell me why this isn't working?
I've got a field with contents like this:
1.0[tab]3[tab]0[tab]3
1.3[tab]1[tab]0[tab]1
1.5[tab]2[tab]0[tab]2
2.0[tab]5[tab]0[tab]5
3.0i[tab]50[tab]0[tab]50
4.5c[tab]1[tab]0[tab]1
8.0[tab]10[tab]0[tab]10
Where [tab] = an actual tab character. I want to
Please ignore this post. I seem to be suffering from a major brain
cramp today. :-)
The filter does indeed work as expected. Sorry to bother everyone.
Chris
On Nov 13, 2006, at 9:28 AM, Chris Sheffield wrote:
Can anyone tell me why this isn't working?
I've got a field with contents like
Works here
Mac OSX 10.4.8, Rev 2.7.2
Be sure that your itemDel is set to TAB, or item 1 of container will not be
what you think.
Tabs can indeed be used in the filter command.
Jim Ault
Las Vegas
On 11/13/06 8:28 AM, Chris Sheffield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can anyone tell me why this isn't
Another text filtering question, please. I have studied the archives
but have not found precisely the solution that works.
I have a container vContainer of file names, each line of the form
directory/!?!filename!/filesize/creationdate
Here are three literal examples:
C:/The
tokens in vContainer.
You need to decide if you are going to use:
replace /a/ with b: in vContainer
wild cards
regEx
or a combination of these.
Using ? as a delimiter will create problems for wild cards (which are the
basis of the 'filter' command) and regEx.
Perhaps the best way for you is to take
Would this help?
put ps,europe into tSearch
repeat for each item tItem in tSearch
replace tItem with % tItem in tFileList
end repeat
filter tFileList with *%*
replace % with in tFileList
This does a or choice and returns the file that contain ps or
europe. I let you work out
One catch is that if the user inputs something like 53, the
operation
must recognize the fact that the 53 in the first two examples is
not a
part of the file name, thereby filtering them out, but that 53 is a
part of the file name in the third example, thereby filtering it in.
This is one
Correction:
[^/%]*)%?([^/%]*
into
([^/%]*)%?([^/%]*)+ which means one or more repetitions of that
pattern.
This was untested. There is obviously a problem with the
parentheses. You could try this:
[^/%]*)%?([^/]*
but this will only replace the first %53, not the second one. That
you have seen with the brute
force approach like the one above?
Mark
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark
Powell
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 10:04 AM
To: use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Subject: Multiple arguments with the filter
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark
Powell
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 10:04 AM
To: use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Subject: Multiple arguments with the filter command
Another text filtering question, please. I have studied the archives
but have not found
are the risks you have seen with the brute
force approach like the one above?
Mark
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark
Powell
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 10:04 AM
To: use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Subject: Multiple arguments with the filter
On 10/25/06 12:54 PM, Mark Powell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks to both Jim and Marielle for their awesome feedback. Instead of
asking specific questions about the details of your feedback, I want to
ask a general performance question. The filter does work within a
repeat loop like this:
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marielle
Lange
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 2:32 PM
To: How to use Revolution
Subject: Re: Multiple arguments with the filter command
Yep, this was the fast solution to the and problem ;-). Best strategy
to adopt then is to first sort the search items
there are no special chars used.
Like for example hard spaces, which alter the string of a word or
words if in between.
Filter command goes haywire if a null character (numtochar(0)) is
in a text (origin could be certain wordprocessors, databases or rev
itself)
Greetings,
Wouter
Hello Everyone,
I'm having a bit of trouble with the Filter command giving me false
positives. I'm picking off company names in a file containing news
headlines. The headlines file has one headline per line, and each
line is tab delimited, where the first item is a unique story number
Lypny a écrit :
Hello Everyone,
I'm having a bit of trouble with the Filter command giving me
false positives. I'm picking off company names in a file
containing news headlines. The headlines file has one headline per
line, and each line is tab delimited, where the first item is a
unique
Gregory Lypny wrote:
Hello Everyone,
I'm having a bit of trouble with the Filter command giving me
false positives. I'm picking off company names in a file containing
news headlines. The headlines file has one headline per line, and
each line is tab delimited, where the first item
breakpoint
end copy
..then see if the numbers add up like you think
There could be 'hidden' characters confusing the filter command
In that case the answer would be to [if the char was (11)]
replace numtochar(11) with in headlineList
before doing the filter command
Jim Ault
Las
Thanks Eric, Alex and Jim,
I'm going to give your debugging suggestion a shot.
Greg
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
Hello Everyone,
I've created a search field that uses the Filter command in a
keyUp handler in a search phrase field to do searches as I type.
What I am not able to do is refresh the search as I delete characters
by trapping the deleteKey message. The following handler does nothing
Try on backspaceKey.
Mark
On 26 Sep 2005, at 16:23, Gregory Lypny wrote:
Hello Everyone,
I've created a search field that uses the Filter command in a
keyUp handler in a search phrase field to do searches as I type.
What I am not able to do is refresh the search as I delete
I did. Same problem.
Greg
On Sep 26, 2005, at 12:02 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Try on backspaceKey.
Mark
On 26 Sep 2005, at 16:23, Gregory Lypny wrote:
Hello Everyone,
I've created a search field that uses the Filter command in a
keyUp handler in a search phrase field
Lypny wrote:
Hello Everyone,
I've created a search field that uses the Filter command in a
keyUp handler in a search phrase field to do searches as I type.
What I am not able to do is refresh the search as I delete
characters by trapping the deleteKey message. The following
handler does
I've created a search field that uses the Filter command in a
keyUp handler in a search phrase field to do searches as I type.
What I am not able to do is refresh the search as I delete characters
by trapping the deleteKey message. The following handler does nothing:
on deleteKey
Hi Sarah and Mark,
What platform are you on? It works on mac OS 10.4, here.
Cheers,
Mark
Tiger, 10.4.2
I don't think you can do it just by passing a keyUp message with no
parameter. I would do it by writing a separate handler to do the
actual filtering. Then call this filter handler
Hello,
I have two flds. There are list flds.
I'd like to put in a variable the lines which are common to the two flds
example
Fld 1
one
three
five
Fld 2
One
two
three
four
the variable must contain :
one
three
How to proceed ?
thanks.
--
Greetings.
Yves COPPE
Email : [EMAIL
: yves COPPE [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 3:05 PM
Subject: filter command
Hello,
I have two flds. There are list flds.
I'd like to put in a variable the lines which are common to the two flds
example
Fld 1
one
three
five
Fld 2
One
two
oops put that add in too :-)
- Original Message -
From: Michael Foy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 4:14 PM
Subject: Re: filter command
how something along the lines
sorry don't know rr enough to do the scripting, but here is some pseudo
code
-
From: yves COPPE [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 3:05 PM
Subject: filter command
Hello,
I have two flds. There are list flds.
I'd like to put in a variable the lines which are common to the two flds
example
Fld 1
one
three
At 4:53 pm +0100 10/4/02, Dave Cragg wrote:
function commonLines pList1, pList2
repeat for each line tLine in pList1
put 1 into tArray[tLine]
end repeat
repeat for each line tLine in pList2
add 1 to tArray[tLine]
end repeat
put keys(tArray) into tKeys
repeat for each
Hi everybody
Thank you for your answers.
The script from Ben doesn't give the right answer.
Sorry.
The faster for comparing big files is the script of Ken
The script of Dave is the most interessant, but the order of the
lines is totaly changed.
So I shall use the script of Ken.
Now, my
At 4:53 pm +0100 10/4/02, Dave Cragg wrote:
function commonLines pList1, pList2
repeat for each line tLine in pList1
put 1 into tArray[tLine]
end repeat
repeat for each line tLine in pList2
add 1 to tArray[tLine]
end repeat
put keys(tArray) into tKeys
repeat for each
: yves COPPE [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 11:43 AM
Subject: Re: filter command
Hi everybody
Thank you for your answers.
The script from Ben doesn't give the right answer.
Sorry.
The faster for comparing big files is the script of Ken
The script
At 6:49 pm +0200 10/4/02, yves COPPE wrote:
This is better, I think.
function commonLines pList1, pList2
repeat for each line tLine in pList1
put 1 into tArray[tLine]
end repeat
repeat for each line tLine in pList2
if tArray[tLine] = 1 then
put 2 into
55 matches
Mail list logo
