Re: New Classic Standalone with 2.9.0

2008-04-04 Thread Bill Marriott
Hi Joe, I just compiled a Classic Standalone using 2.9.0 with my very small HC stack (56k) that suddenly grew to 2.2 MB, and when transferred to a Mac G4 running 9.2.2, it produces an error dialog that says it cannot be opened due to a type -199 error. The file size increase is of

Re: New Classic Standalone with 2.9.0

2008-04-04 Thread Joe Lewis Wilkins
Hi Bill, I copied the new Classic standalone to a USB Zip Drive and then reconnected the drive to the G4, in turn copying the file to the G4. I hadn't refined the app very much with its own icon, etc. Just used all the default settings. But thanks, this gives me something to keep in mind

Re: New Classic Standalone with 2.9.0

2008-04-04 Thread J. Landman Gay
Joe Lewis Wilkins wrote: Hi Bill, I copied the new Classic standalone to a USB Zip Drive and then reconnected the drive to the G4, in turn copying the file to the G4. You probably lost the resource fork in the transfer. The solution is to zip the app first in OS X, then copy it to the

Re: New Classic Standalone with 2.9.0

2008-04-04 Thread Joe Lewis Wilkins
Hi Jacqi, Didn't get the -199 error, but couldn't find the application that created it, so wouldn't open. After transferring the zipped file to my G4, I unzipped it with the Stuffit Expander. Should I have used something else? Thanks, Joe Wilkins On Apr 4, 2008, at 11:46 AM, J. Landman

Re: New Classic Standalone with 2.9.0

2008-04-04 Thread J. Landman Gay
Joe Lewis Wilkins wrote: Hi Jacqi, Didn't get the -199 error, but couldn't find the application that created it, so wouldn't open. After transferring the zipped file to my G4, I unzipped it with the Stuffit Expander. Should I have used something else? That should have worked. But if you

Re: New Classic Standalone with 2.9.0

2008-04-04 Thread Joe Lewis Wilkins
Hi Jacqi, Still struggling with this thing. Actually, I decided to make a Classic Standalone of a Rev stack instead of an HyperCard stack that was converted; just to see if there is a difference. My problem right now is that my mind is too fragmented - not doing some stuff I should be

Re: New Classic Standalone with 2.9.0

2008-04-04 Thread Joe Lewis Wilkins
Well, if anyone else has been able to make a Classic standalone, either from a new Rev Stack or from a HC stack that has been opened as a Rev Stack, I'd sure like to hear about it. On my Mac Pro Running Leopard and G4 running OS 9.2.2 I have not been able to achieve it. On my last efforts,

New Classic Standalone with 2.9.0

2008-04-03 Thread Joe Lewis Wilkins
Hi all, I just compiled a Classic Standalone using 2.9.0 with my very small HC stack (56k) that suddenly grew to 2.2 MB, and when transferred to a Mac G4 running 9.2.2, it produces an error dialog that says it cannot be opened due to a type -199 error. Rather disappointing; particularly