-pattern, by markup, by
addressed chunking, by packets?
-Original Message-
From: "Randall Reetz"
To: "How to use Revolution"
Sent: 3/24/2009 11:07 AM
Subject: RE: [OT] Open Source, EULA - the Big Bad Bogeyman
What does the open source community say about revenue? What if
o: "How to use Revolution"
Sent: 3/23/2009 11:15 PM
Subject: Re: [OT] Open Source, EULA - the Big Bad Bogeyman
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Judy Perry wrote:
>
> It's funny you bring this up, ...
>
> I especially like how the iTunes EULA states that it may not be used
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 6:38 PM, Luis wrote:
> Well, start with the ZX81, running a Nuclear Power plant, and go up from
> there (with a 16k RAM pack +wobble).
>
> Unfortunately I believe the 250 baud cassette interface was only usable for
data storage, not music playback ;-)
_
Well, start with the ZX81, running a Nuclear Power plant, and go up
from there (with a 16k RAM pack +wobble).
Cheers,
Luis.
On 24 Mar 2009, at 06:15, Kay C Lan wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Judy Perry
wrote:
It's funny you bring this up, ...
I especially like how the iTunes
C Lan"
To: "How to use Revolution"
Sent: 3/23/2009 11:15 PM
Subject: Re: [OT] Open Source, EULA - the Big Bad Bogeyman
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Judy Perry wrote:
>
> It's funny you bring this up, ...
>
> I especially like how the iTunes EULA states that i
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Judy Perry wrote:
>
> It's funny you bring this up, ...
>
> I especially like how the iTunes EULA states that it may not be used to
> plan, build or operate a nuclear power facility. The last time I d/l an
> update of iTunes I made certain to read that part ;-)
>
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 12:05 PM, viktoras d. wrote:
>
> The ground becomes so slippery when money talks...
Or as Dylan said, money doesn't talk, it swears...
Judy
http://revined.blogspot.com
>
>
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.
Kay,
It's funny you bring this up, as this was one of the things we just covered
last week in my class.
If anyone has too much time on their hands and not enough reading material,
here are some links I dug up for my class on especially egregious EULAs:
http://www.benedelman.org/news/112904-1.html
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 3:05 AM, viktoras d. wrote:
> one more "laud" case, not software, but still related:
> http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/02/is_the_obama_po.html
>
> The ground becomes so slippery when money talks...
>
> Although your link was not software, that link had a fu
one more "laud" case, not software, but still related:
http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/02/is_the_obama_po.html
The ground becomes so slippery when money talks...
Viktoras
Kay C Lan wrote:
Listers,
Unfortunately I missed the recent frenzy regarding "Illegal Creativity".
I do n
Lynn Fredricks wrote:
There have been many times Ive been asked about new products during the dot
com (and even now moreso in Web 2.5) eras wherein the developers are happy
to knowingly file even when its clear they were too late or aware of
significant prior art that would invalidate it if only
> Reminds me of the Compton Multimedia Patent case, in which
> they claimed ownership rights to the ability of any CD-ROM to
> contain more than one type of media (text, audio, video,
> raster graphics, vector graphics, etc.).
>
> The USPTO rubber-stamped that one and it took a bit of a
> batt
Lynn Fredricks wrote:
It also sadly supports what I see as a policy of the USPO to just
rubber-stamp anything that comes in and let the courts (with plantiffs and
defendants) sort out and pay for their bad judgement. Of course, maybe
someone some time ago came up with a great and truly efficient
Ummm isn't that an oxymoron. Government patent office, efficient
patent reviews?
On Mar 23, 2009, at 12:06 PM, Lynn Fredricks wrote:
maybe
someone some time ago came up with a great and truly efficient
method of
managing patent reviews - and patented it ;-)
_
> The result of the Appeal was only last Aug 13th 2008 and
> reversed the decision of the lower court. But this is not the
> end, as of 11 Feb 09 KAM Industries is seeking damages of U$6,000,000+
A facinating read :-)
The most interesting fruit from this is the seeming recognition of rights of
15 matches
Mail list logo
