Alex Shaw wrote:
Some good info & tips for using PNGs..
http://user.fundy.net/morris/?photoshop27.shtml
http://user.fundy.net/morris/?photoshop03.shtml
Really good articles; thanks for posting those. Not only great info on
the PNG format, but also fine examples of good instructional design.
Hi Richard & others..
Some good info & tips for using PNGs..
http://user.fundy.net/morris/?photoshop27.shtml
http://user.fundy.net/morris/?photoshop03.shtml
regards
alex
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this
Hi Tom,
1.8 on my intel iMac 17" by default.
All the best,
Malte
I wonder what the new Intel Macs are set to?
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscript
Sarah,
I just checked and the G4 15 inch Laptop is using 1.8 and is plugged
into my 23 Cinema HD Display which is default set to 2.2
So the laptop is still 1.8
On my Sony laptop the gamma is 2.2 and on the 17 Sony flat screen it
is also 2.2
I think Apple is changing in the HD displays. I
On 5/18/06, Martin Baxter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Richard Gaskin wrote:
> Not being a graphics pro, I don't care one way or the other what the
> gamma's set to, as long as it's consistent across platforms. If Apple's
> default setting is a better match to the real world, will PC
> makers/Micr
Richard Gaskin wrote:
Not being a graphics pro, I don't care one way or the other what the
gamma's set to, as long as it's consistent across platforms. If Apple's
default setting is a better match to the real world, will PC
makers/Microsoft follow suit?
It's on the outer fringes of likelih
Richard Gaskin wrote:
If Apple's default setting is a better match to the real world, will
PC makers/Microsoft follow suit?
ROTFLOL!
Phil
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe
Martin Baxter wrote:
Richard Gaskin wrote:
...
It's a tradeoff: the Apple gamma may give more detail among darker
colors, but at the loss of detail among lighter ones. The default gamma
for Macs is so light that the whole thing looks washed out to me; the
first thing I do when I get a new
Richard Gaskin wrote:
Martin Baxter wrote:
Does it not also have to do with being able to discern subtleties of
shadow detail on-screen? Uncorrected CRT Gamma (as per Win / Nix /
Television) gives a very non-linear display and tends to compress the
bottom 20% to black.
It's a tradeoff: the
Tereza Snyder wrote:
On May 17, 2006, at 1:05 AM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Fireworks, eh? One more thing I like about you. :)
Actually, Richard, way back at the dawn of time (1997?, 98?) I
recommended Fireworks to you when you asked on the list. You had just
switched from Supercard to MetaC
Martin Baxter wrote:
Does it not also have to do with being able to discern subtleties of
shadow detail on-screen? Uncorrected CRT Gamma (as per Win / Nix /
Television) gives a very non-linear display and tends to compress the
bottom 20% to black.
It's a tradeoff: the Apple gamma may give mo
On May 17, 2006, at 1:05 AM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Fireworks, eh? One more thing I like about you. :)
Actually, Richard, way back at the dawn of time (1997?, 98?) I
recommended Fireworks to you when you asked on the list. You had just
switched from Supercard to MetaCard if I recall. I'v
Martin,
My HD Cinema display is factory set to a Apple display native -
Response Curve of Gamma of 2.2 but the individual Red, Green and Blue
response curves are set to 1.801
When I do a Calibration these are all set-able.
Tom
On May 17, 2006, at 8:16 AM, Martin Baxter wrote:
David and R
Also,
Targa and PNG do store gamma BUT JPEG, TIFF and GIF do not store
gamma information.
Gamma storage can be a good thing if used correctly and is preferable
in the print industry.
More on gamma: http://www.cgsd.com/papers/gamma.html
Tom
On May 17, 2006, at 7:58 AM, Thomas McGrath
David and Richard,
Does it not also have to do with being able to discern subtleties of
shadow detail on-screen? Uncorrected CRT Gamma (as per Win / Nix /
Television) gives a very non-linear display and tends to compress the
bottom 20% to black.
Images made in systems like this tend not to h
Concerning PNGs and Gamma,
This behavior of PNGs also occurs when using PNGs in a PocketPC
device. In recent development I had PNGs with transparency "self"
adjusting by as much as 15 points. I started out with pure white
255,255,255 for transparency and an off white 250,250,250 for non
t
In the old days, 1.8 gave better print results - something to do with
dot gains (?). That's proper commercial printing, not the stuff we do
with desktop printers. I don't think it makes any difference now, but I
could be wrong. If not, there are no obvious obstacles to Apple
switching to 2.2.
Tereza Snyder wrote:
On May 16, 2006, at 10:47 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Rev doesn't alter the display of JPEGs or GIFs -- why single out
PNGs in this way, and why try to adjust for screen gamma when the
screen is already doing anything that needs to be done there?
and Mark Talluto wrote:
On May 16, 2006, at 10:47 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Rev doesn't alter the display of JPEGs or GIFs -- why single out
PNGs in this way, and why try to adjust for screen gamma when the
screen is already doing anything that needs to be done there?
and Mark Talluto wrote:
This is a question t
Recently, Richard Gaskin wrote:
> Rev doesn't alter the display of JPEGs or GIFs -- why single out PNGs in
> this way, and why try to adjust for screen gamma when the screen is
> already doing anything that needs to be done there?
I don't have the document links I used to, but suffice it to say,
On May 16, 2006, at 8:47 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Phil Davis wrote:
What happened was the screenGamma, since my image is a PNG file.
Rev's screenGamma is a color? or brightness? or ??? adjustment
factor applied only to PNG files. The screenGamma defaults are
1.7 for Mac and 2.2 for Wi
Phil Davis wrote:
What happened was the screenGamma, since my image is a PNG file.
Rev's screenGamma is a color? or brightness? or ??? adjustment
factor applied only to PNG files. The screenGamma defaults are 1.7
for Mac and 2.2 for Windows. (I don't know what they are for Linux.)
I then u
Hi Mark,
Yes - there are certainly some great reasons to use PNGs. My comments
really only apply in a particular context, even though I state them as
absolute. :o) I'm really good at that.
Phil
Mark Talluto wrote:
On May 16, 2006, at 5:23 PM, Phil Davis wrote:
I just re-discovered some
On May 16, 2006, at 5:23 PM, Phil Davis wrote:
I just re-discovered something that might be helpful to others, so
here goes.
Bottom line:
To simplify your code and your life, use JPG images, not PNGs, in
stacks intended for cross-platform use. That way you don't have to
mess with the sc
I just re-discovered something that might be helpful to others, so here
goes.
Bottom line:
To simplify your code and your life, use JPG images, not PNGs, in stacks
intended for cross-platform use. That way you don't have to mess with
the screenGamma property to make everything look the same e
25 matches
Mail list logo
