Denis, could you please open an issue on JIRA with any specifics that
you have? That would help us make sure that it doesn't get lost
(especially since we were considering releasing a 1.6.2 soon). Thanks
for asking, too.
Christopher wrote:
Minutes at a time is a lot of time. I think Eric Newt
Minutes at a time is a lot of time. I think Eric Newton was looking at some
performance issues with assignments. This could be related to that.
--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 4:42 PM, Denis wrote:
> 1. client requests are timed out. also http://m
1. client requests are timed out. also http://monitor/tables shows
number of offline tablets for each table.
2. few minutes (up to 10)
3. about 6000
4. yes
5. I do not remember the problem with accumulo 1.4.
On 1/10/15, Christopher wrote:
> Adding a new tserver creates an imbalanced situation, wh
Adding a new tserver creates an imbalanced situation, where tablets are not
spread evenly across tablet servers. The tablet balancer in the master
server occasionally rebalances tablets. During the short period of time
those tablets are migrating, they will be temporarily offline. That should
have
Hi
I recently upgraded my Accumulo cluster from 1.4 to 1.6 and noticed a
regression.
Removing a tserver makes puts some tablets offline for a while until
other tservers start handling them, that's normal.
But with 1.6 the same happens on adding a tserver as well.
Is it ok?
