Denis, could you please open an issue on JIRA with any specifics that
you have? That would help us make sure that it doesn't get lost
(especially since we were considering releasing a 1.6.2 soon). Thanks
for asking, too.
Christopher wrote:
Minutes at a time is a lot of time. I think Eric Newton was looking at
some performance issues with assignments. This could be related to that.
--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 4:42 PM, Denis <de...@camfex.cz
<mailto:de...@camfex.cz>> wrote:
1. client requests are timed out. also http://monitor/tables shows
number of offline tablets for each table.
2. few minutes (up to 10)
3. about 6000
4. yes
5. I do not remember the problem with accumulo 1.4.
On 1/10/15, Christopher <ctubb...@apache.org
<mailto:ctubb...@apache.org>> wrote:
> Adding a new tserver creates an imbalanced situation, where
tablets are not
> spread evenly across tablet servers. The tablet balancer in the
master
> server occasionally rebalances tablets. During the short period
of time
> those tablets are migrating, they will be temporarily offline.
That should
> have always been the case and would be perfectly normal.
>
> I'm curious:
> 1) how did you detect these were offline?
> 2) how long were they offline?
> 3) how many tablets do you have per server?
> 4) are you using the default balancers?
> 5) in what sense do you mean "regression"? are you thinking this
is linked
> to a previous bug/issue?
>
>
>
> --
> Christopher L Tubbs II
> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>
> On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 10:31 AM, Denis <de...@camfex.cz
<mailto:de...@camfex.cz>> wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> I recently upgraded my Accumulo cluster from 1.4 to 1.6 and
noticed a
>> regression.
>>
>> Removing a tserver makes puts some tablets offline for a while until
>> other tservers start handling them, that's normal.
>>
>> But with 1.6 the same happens on adding a tserver as well.
>> Is it ok?
>>
>
