I created a util for doing this, but i haven't worked on it in a while...
You could see if it still works
https://github.com/agwells0714/AccumuloDeveloperUtil
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 10:31 AM, Corey Nolet wrote:
> Sven,
>
> What version of Accumulo are you running? We have
btw, my solution revolved around this issue:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2851
which let users save their data off somewhere, then load it into the new
mac cluster
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Andrew Wells <awe...@clearedgeit.com>
wrote:
> I created a util
On the surface it adds an additional level of specification/grouping.
The potential benefit we have in accumulo is that along with the fact that
identical rowID's are guaranteed to be in the same file. You can use
Locality Groups, to place specific Column Families into the same file as
well.
to implement that iterator.
looks like you will only need to override replaceColumnFamily
and this looks to return the new ColumnFamily via the argument. So
manipulate the Text object provided.
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 8:06 AM, Andrew Wells awe...@clearedgeit.com
wrote:
Looks like you want
Also, checkout
https://accumulo.apache.org/1.6/apidocs/org/apache/accumulo/core/iterators/user/TransformingIterator.html
for helping you with this task
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 8:59 AM, Eric Newton eric.new...@gmail.com wrote:
Short answer: no.
Long answer: maybe.
You can write an iterator
This should have been sent to users...
I have been working on a tool, that I am calling Q4A.
However, due to my upcoming wedding, I have not had much time to work on
it. I was hoping during the Accumulo Hackathon this week, I could actually
get some more elbow grease into it and maybe get some
I have been working on a project, tentatively called Q4A (Query for
Accumulo). Another possible name is ASQ (Accumulo Streaming Query) [discus].
This is a streaming query as the query is completed via a stream, should
never group data in memory. To batch, intermediate results would be written
/GPL-compatibility.html
GPLv3 is generally similar, but you must distribute the source. Code which
uses GPLv3 must also be distributed as GPL.
Andrew Wells wrote:
I have been working on a tool, that I am calling Q4A.
However, due to my upcoming wedding, I have not had much time to work
The main issue with adding data in an iterator is order. If you have can do
a merge sort insertion, then you can guarantee order and its fine. But if
you are inserting base on input you cannot guarantee order, and it can only
be on scan iterator.
On Feb 15, 2015 8:03 PM, Dylan Hutchison
That's really cool. Looks like the devbox is getting an update
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 3:58 PM, Adam Fuchs afu...@apache.org wrote:
Neato!
Adam
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 3:25 PM, Christopher ctubb...@apache.org wrote:
Accumulators,
Fedora Linux now ships with Accumulo 1.6 packaged and
You have been unsubscribed from the internet.[?]
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Terry P. texpi...@gmail.com wrote:
unsubscribe
--
*Andrew George Wells*
*Software Engineer*
*awe...@clearedgeit.com awe...@clearedgeit.com*
This expands on what Keith is saying. I have done something like this
before.
For this example, I am going to assume a few things. This is a mater of my
opinion and experience and my not fall directly with what you want to do. I
have experience with doing this where you insert into the same
I am working for a client, and they keep getting TABLET_LOAD problems.
I am assuming it means that the tablet is being overloaded, but there
really isn't any definition of what this means, or its cause.
This also goes for other problem statuses like FiILE_READ FILE_WRITE
As accumulo get bigger,
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 9:04 AM, Eric Newton eric.new...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 8:47 AM, Andrew Wells awe...@clearedgeit.com
wrote:
I am working for a client, and they keep getting TABLET_LOAD problems.
Okay.
I am assuming it means that the tablet is being
Are there currently any good practices on doing this?
Especially when a rowId has a large number of Keys.
--
*Andrew George Wells*
*Software Engineer*
*awe...@clearedgeit.com awe...@clearedgeit.com*
to reverse the sort order of
the keys on ingest.
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Andrew Wells awe...@clearedgeit.com
wrote:
Are there currently any good practices on doing this?
Especially when a rowId has a large number of Keys.
--
*Andrew George Wells*
*Software Engineer*
*awe
Thanks for the reply!
I was just wondering if there was a more recent development for doing this.
It is interesting to hear you got it working on 1.5.0.
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 9:33 AM, Andrew Catterall
catteralland...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi Andrew,
I've just seen your post to the
17 matches
Mail list logo