>
> On the topic of the mailing lists...
>
> Around Sept 2004, I raised an issue that dev mail list archive search
> functionality is not working. I sent a mail to infrastructure and got
no
> response. I raised an infrastructure JIRA issue and got no response.
>
> For people new to the proj
toby cabot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 10/02/2005 04:04:01 AM:
>
> 2. From mailing list traffic I've seen it looks as if the source
> releases are broken (at least the tarballs), and they're definitely
> obsolete and unmaintained, so why not just get rid of them entirely?
> People who are inte
On Wed, 9 Feb 2005 12:04:01 -0500, toby cabot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bruce, Geronimo Team,
>
> "What we've got here, is a failure to communicate."
>
> There's a difference between "progress" and "the appearance of
> progess" and both are important. There's a *lot* of progress
> happening,
On Feb 9, 2005, at 12:01 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
On Feb 9, 2005, at 12:24 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
We suffer from a failure to keep people informed of progress being
made in Geronimo. One thing we obviously do not do often enough is
update the project home page.
I am under the impression th
Excellent ideas!
+1 submit a patch
Also you can update the wiki imedately. Actually, feel free to make
"big" changes the the xdocs. There is no one maintaining them, so if
you have the motivation and time, I'm sure no one will object. Heck
I've been wanting to move our site away from a maven
On Feb 9, 2005, at 12:24 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
We suffer from a failure to keep people informed of progress being
made in Geronimo. One thing we obviously do not do often enough is
update the project home page.
I am under the impression that regenerating the site using maven and
reloading it
FWIW, I would suggest you put up a weblog, and allow anyone working on
Geronimo to post, and post anything they think might be of interest to
folks outside the project. Plus folks can get updated via an RSS feed!
Based on the end results from all the other sites using Maven, it sure
looks like
We suffer from a failure to keep people informed of progress being made
in Geronimo. One thing we obviously do not do often enough is update the
project home page.
I am under the impression that regenerating the site using maven and
reloading it is a serious PITA. I would like to ask if this is
toby cabot wrote:
I believe that a small amount of time spent bringing appearances in
line with reality would be well spent in terms of saving time by not
having discussions like this one. It might even attract more people
to Geronimo, at least it won't turn them away. If folks agree with
the gis
Bruce, Geronimo Team,
"What we've got here, is a failure to communicate."
There's a difference between "progress" and "the appearance of
progess" and both are important. There's a *lot* of progress
happening, and you guys are justifiably proud of that progress, but
the message that you're gettin
On Wed, 09 Feb 2005 14:08:28 +1300, Chris Dodunski
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm pleased to hear that you are in 'go-go-go' mode. As someone who has
> used and supported Apache open source software for years, I was rapt
> back in 2003 to hear of the Geronimo project. So I subscribed to the
>
Chris Dodunski wrote:
Hi David,
I'm pleased to hear that you are in 'go-go-go' mode. As someone who has
used and supported Apache open source software for years, I was rapt
back in 2003 to hear of the Geronimo project. So I subscribed to the
Geronimo mailing list, to keep up-to-date with progress
Hi David,
I'm pleased to hear that you are in 'go-go-go' mode. As someone who has
used and supported Apache open source software for years, I was rapt
back in 2003 to hear of the Geronimo project. So I subscribed to the
Geronimo mailing list, to keep up-to-date with progress.
Admittedly, I was
13 matches
Mail list logo
