Re: Giraph offloadPartition fails creation directory

2013-09-12 Thread Alexander Asplund
the distributed cache is stored. Could you provide the stacktrace Giraph is spitting when failing? On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 12:54 AM, Alexander Asplund alexaspl...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, I'm still trying to get Giraph to work on a graph that requires more memory that is available

Re: Giraph offloadPartition fails creation directory

2013-09-12 Thread Alexander Asplund
, 2013 at 12:54 AM, Alexander Asplund alexaspl...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I'm still trying to get Giraph to work on a graph that requires more memory that is available. The problem is that when the Workers try to offload partitions, the offloading fails. The DiskBackedPartitionStore fails

Re: Giraph offloadPartition fails creation directory

2013-09-12 Thread Alexander Asplund
Actually, why is it saying it fails to create directory in the first place, when it is trying to write files? On Sep 12, 2013 3:04 PM, Alexander Asplund alexaspl...@gmail.com wrote: I can also add that there is no such issue with DiskBackedMessageStore. It successfully creates a large number

Giraph offloadPartition fails creation directory

2013-09-11 Thread Alexander Asplund
Hi, I'm still trying to get Giraph to work on a graph that requires more memory that is available. The problem is that when the Workers try to offload partitions, the offloading fails. The DiskBackedPartitionStore fails to create the directory _bsp/_partitions/job-/part-vertices-xxx (roughly

Re: Out of core execution has no effect on GC crash

2013-09-10 Thread Alexander Asplund
really fragmented. There are options that you can set with Java to change the type of garbage collection and how it is scheduled as well. You might up the heap size slightly - what is the default heap size on your cluster? On 9/9/2013 8:33 PM, Alexander Asplund wrote: A small note: I'm

Re: Out of core execution has no effect on GC crash

2013-09-10 Thread Alexander Asplund
Correction: the computation does not actually stall - it does complains a bit that the directories cannot be created and then eventually moves to the next superstep. I guess this means I'm actually fitting all the data in memory? On 9/10/13, Alexander Asplund alexaspl...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks

Re: Out of core execution has no effect on GC crash

2013-09-09 Thread Alexander Asplund
also at input superstep. try to decrease the number of partitions kept in memory. On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 1:37 AM, Alexander Asplund alexaspl...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, I'm trying to process a graph that is about 3 times the size of available memory. On the other hand, there is plenty of disk

Re: Out of core execution has no effect on GC crash

2013-09-09 Thread Alexander Asplund
AM, Alexander Asplund alexaspl...@gmail.comwrote: Thanks for the reply. I tried setting giraph.maxPartitionsInMemory to 1, but I'm still getting OOM: GC limit exceeded. Are there any particular cases the OOC will not be able to handle, or is it supposed to work in all cases? If the latter

Re: Out of core execution has no effect on GC crash

2013-09-09 Thread Alexander Asplund
A small note: I'm not seeing any partitions directory being formed under _bsp, which is where I have understood that they should be appearing. On 9/10/13, Alexander Asplund alexaspl...@gmail.com wrote: Really appreciate the swift responses! Thanks again. I have not both increased mapper tasks