Re: "Big Data" Problem

2016-05-24 Thread Deepak Goel
I did discuss with the product owner. It seems, it is a business requirement and we cannot question the customer on whether their need is valid or not (Or is it legal or ethical). I was wondering, (on a technical level!), can't we incorporate a change in Hadoop, whereby it allows the parent

Re: "Big Data" Problem

2016-05-24 Thread Suvro Choudhury
IMHO, you should discuss this with your product owner /business customer since this relates to the requirement. This forum is for purely technical questions, although I agree as human being we need to be sensitive about these. You can also try posting to Quora and see what folks think. Cheers! On

RE: Filing a JIRA

2016-05-24 Thread John Lilley
That's it! Thanks. John Lilley From: Chris Nauroth [mailto:cnaur...@hortonworks.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2016 10:24 AM To: John Lilley ; 'user@hadoop.apache.org' Subject: Re: Filing a JIRA Something is definitely odd about the UI there.

question on long running YARN app via Kerberos

2016-05-24 Thread Chen Song
Hi I am working on running a long lived app on a secure Yarn cluster. After some reading on this domain, I want to make sure my understanding on the life cycle of an app on Kerberos-enabled Yarn is correct as below. 1. Client kinit to login into KDC and add the HDFS delegation tokens to the

Re: "Big Data" Problem

2016-05-24 Thread Deepak Goel
Hmm..i understand what you are saying Chris :) However it is like that. You are building a knife (Hadoop in this case) and you would know that you would kill someone by it. Would you build the knife at all (So it is about Hadoop also in some sense. But as pointed about by you, it is not a

Re: Mask value not shown in GETFACL using webhdfs

2016-05-24 Thread Chris Nauroth
Hello Kumar, I answered at the Stack Overflow link. I'll repeat the same information here for everyone's benefit. HDFS implements the POSIX ACL model [1]. The linked documentation explains that the mask entry is persisted into the group permission bits of the classic POSIX permission model.

Re: distcp fails with "source and target differ in block-size"

2016-05-24 Thread Chris Nauroth
There is also some discussion on that JIRA considering a checksum strategy independent of block size. I don't think anything was ever implemented though, and there would be some drawbacks to that approach. Sorry if this caused confusion. --Chris Nauroth On 5/24/16, 9:55 AM, "Dmitry

Re: "Big Data" Problem

2016-05-24 Thread Chris Nauroth
Hello Deepak, This is a fascinating question, but it's not the right forum. This list is for questions on usage of Apache Hadoop. I don't see anything about Hadoop in your question. Even if the software in question involves Hadoop, it's not a question about usage. Unfortunately, I'm not

Re: distcp fails with "source and target differ in block-size"

2016-05-24 Thread Dmitry Sivachenko
> On 24 May 2016, at 19:53, Chris Nauroth wrote: > > Hello Dmitry, > > To clarify, the intent of MAPREDUCE-5065 was to message the user that > using different block sizes on source and destination might cause a > failure to checksum mismatch. The message to the user

Re: distcp fails with "source and target differ in block-size"

2016-05-24 Thread Chris Nauroth
Hello Dmitry, To clarify, the intent of MAPREDUCE-5065 was to message the user that using different block sizes on source and destination might cause a failure to checksum mismatch. The message to the user recommends either the -pb (preserve block size) or -skipCrc (skip checksum validation) as

Re: Filing a JIRA

2016-05-24 Thread Chris Nauroth
Something is definitely odd about the UI there. From your second link, can you try clicking directly on the "Create" button (not the drop-down arrow leading to "Create Detailed")? --Chris Nauroth From: John Lilley > Date: Tuesday, May

RE: Filing a JIRA

2016-05-24 Thread John Lilley
I'm still confused. When I go to that link, it redirects to: https://issues.apache.org/jira/servicedesk/agent/INFRA/queues When I file a bug using that link, it attempts to file it against Atlas, not Hadoop. If I select project "HADOOP" from the drop-down, it takes me to here:

Re: "Big Data" Problem

2016-05-24 Thread Deepak Goel
Well the bank gives out loans to corporate customers and gets a higher rate of returns. However there is a higher risk to it and everyone knows in advance about it. Earlier the savings and corporate account were separate and not linked to each other (they were separate islands). Now the bank with

Re: "Big Data" Problem

2016-05-24 Thread Rasp Berry
Just out of curiosity, when you say "however it is not completely ethical to link the corporate account to the savings account of the customer company", where are you getting the idea that it is not ethical? I am not saying I think it is or isn't, but I am more curious as to how you arrived at

Re: "Big Data" Problem

2016-05-24 Thread Amr Shahin
It sounds very unethical, if i had the choice i wouldn't do it, think however that if you don't then someone else with less moral standards will do On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 1:59 AM, Deepak Goel wrote: > > Hey > > Namaskara~Nalama~Guten Tag~Bonjour > > (Sorry, as this might not

RE: No edits files in dfs.namenode.edits.dir

2016-05-24 Thread sky88088
Hi, Harsh. The "dfs.namenode.edits.dir" from "hdfs getconf" is "file:///data1/hadoop/name", the same as "dfs.namenode.name.dir". However, in the NameNode web UI("namenode:8088/conf"), none of "dfs.namenode.edits.dir" or "dfs.namenode.name.dir" is set. In both source, the "hadoop.tmp.dir" is