Re: 0.94 going forward

2014-12-16 Thread Brian Jeltema
RPC and that was changed to protobufs. AFAIK snapshots can also not be exported from 0.94 and 0.98. We have a really shitty story here. From: Sean Busbey bus...@cloudera.com To: user user@hbase.apache.org Sent: Monday, December 15, 2014 5:04 PM Subject: Re: 0.94 going forward Does

Re: 0.94 going forward

2014-12-16 Thread Ted Yu
story here. From: Sean Busbey bus...@cloudera.com To: user user@hbase.apache.org Sent: Monday, December 15, 2014 5:04 PM Subject: Re: 0.94 going forward Does replication and snapshot export work from 0.94.6+ to a 0.96 or 0.98 cluster? Presuming it does, shouldn't a site be able

Re: 0.94 going forward

2014-12-16 Thread Andrew Purtell
. AFAIK snapshots can also not be exported from 0.94 and 0.98. We have a really shitty story here. From: Sean Busbey bus...@cloudera.com To: user user@hbase.apache.org Sent: Monday, December 15, 2014 5:04 PM Subject: Re: 0.94 going forward Does replication and snapshot export

Re: 0.94 going forward

2014-12-16 Thread Esteban Gutierrez
:(Replication uses RPC and that was changed to protobufs. AFAIK snapshots can also not be exported from 0.94 and 0.98. We have a really shitty story here. From: Sean Busbey bus...@cloudera.com To: user user@hbase.apache.org Sent: Monday, December 15, 2014 5:04 PM Subject: Re: 0.94 going

Re: 0.94 going forward

2014-12-16 Thread Ted Yu
@hbase.apache.org Sent: Monday, December 15, 2014 5:04 PM Subject: Re: 0.94 going forward Does replication and snapshot export work from 0.94.6+ to a 0.96 or 0.98 cluster? Presuming it does, shouldn't a site be able to use a multiple cluster set up to do a cut

Re: 0.94 going forward

2014-12-16 Thread Nick Dimiduk
to protobufs. AFAIK snapshots can also not be exported from 0.94 and 0.98. We have a really shitty story here. From: Sean Busbey bus...@cloudera.com To: user user@hbase.apache.org Sent: Monday, December 15, 2014 5:04 PM Subject: Re: 0.94 going forward Does

0.94 going forward

2014-12-15 Thread lars hofhansl
Over the past few months the rate of the change into 0.94 has slowed significantly. 0.94.25 was released on Nov 15th, and since then we had only 4 changes. This could mean two things: (1) 0.94 is very stable now or (2) nobody is using it (at least nobody is contributing to it anymore). If

Re: 0.94 going forward

2014-12-15 Thread Koert Kuipers
given that CDH4 is hbase 0.94 i dont believe nobody is using it. for our clients the majority is on 0.94 (versus 0.96 and up). so i am going with 1), its very stable! On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 1:53 PM, lars hofhansl la...@apache.org wrote: Over the past few months the rate of the change into

Re: 0.94 going forward

2014-12-15 Thread Esteban Gutierrez
Hi Lars, Thanks for bringing this for discussion. From my experience I can tell that 0.94 is very stable but that shouldn't be a blocker to consider to EOL'ing. Are you considering any specific timeframe for that? thanks, esteban. -- Cloudera, Inc. On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 11:46 AM, Koert

Re: 0.94 going forward

2014-12-15 Thread Jeremy Carroll
Looking for guidance on how to do a zero downtime upgrade from 0.94 - 0.98 (or 1.0 if it launches soon). As soon as we can figure this out, we will migrate over. On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 1:37 PM, Esteban Gutierrez este...@cloudera.com wrote: Hi Lars, Thanks for bringing this for discussion.

Re: 0.94 going forward

2014-12-15 Thread Andrew Purtell
Zero downtime upgrade from 0.94 won't be possible. See http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#d0e5199 On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 4:44 PM, Jeremy Carroll phobos...@gmail.com wrote: Looking for guidance on how to do a zero downtime upgrade from 0.94 - 0.98 (or 1.0 if it launches soon). As soon as we

Re: 0.94 going forward

2014-12-15 Thread Jeremy Carroll
Which is why I feel that a lot of customers are still on 0.94. Pretty much trapped unless you want to take downtime for your site. Any type of guidance would be helpful. We are currently in the process of designing our own system to deal with this. On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Andrew Purtell

Re: 0.94 going forward

2014-12-15 Thread Sean Busbey
Does replication and snapshot export work from 0.94.6+ to a 0.96 or 0.98 cluster? Presuming it does, shouldn't a site be able to use a multiple cluster set up to do a cut over of a client application? That doesn't help with needing downtime for to do the eventual upgrade, but it mitigates the

RE: 0.94 going forward

2014-12-15 Thread Bijieshan
Thanks, Lars. We have customers still using 94. It is indeed stable now. Jieshan. From: Sean Busbey [bus...@cloudera.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2014 9:04 AM To: user Subject: Re: 0.94 going forward Does replication and snapshot export work from

Re: 0.94 going forward

2014-12-15 Thread Esteban Gutierrez
still using 94. It is indeed stable now. Jieshan. From: Sean Busbey [bus...@cloudera.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2014 9:04 AM To: user Subject: Re: 0.94 going forward Does replication and snapshot export work from 0.94.6+ to a 0.96 or 0.98

Re: 0.94 going forward

2014-12-15 Thread lars hofhansl
going forward Does replication and snapshot export work from 0.94.6+ to a 0.96 or 0.98 cluster? Presuming it does, shouldn't a site be able to use a multiple cluster set up to do a cut over of a client application? That doesn't help with needing downtime for to do the eventual upgrade

Re: 0.94 going forward

2014-12-15 Thread lars hofhansl
: Re: 0.94 going forward Which is why I feel that a lot of customers are still on 0.94. Pretty much trapped unless you want to take downtime for your site. Any type of guidance would be helpful. We are currently in the process of designing our own system to deal with this. On Mon, Dec 15, 2014