overall scan is not timeout.
>
> Regards
> Ram
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Dan Han [mailto:dannahan2...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Friday, September 28, 2012 3:05 AM
> > To: user@hbase.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Distribution of regions to serv
ay be we may need to see that the overall scan is not timeout.
Regards
Ram
> -Original Message-
> From: Dan Han [mailto:dannahan2...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, September 28, 2012 3:05 AM
> To: user@hbase.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Distribution of regions to servers
; Ram
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Dan Han [mailto:dannahan2...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2012 7:00 AM
> > To: user@hbase.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Distribution of regions to servers
> >
> > Hi, Eugeny ,
> >
> >
> servers.
> > > >
> > > > Therefore, we have been thinking to add a monitoring and management
> > > > component between the client and server, which can schedule the
> > > > queries/jobs from client side and distribute the regions dynamically
> >
he client and server, which can schedule the
> > > queries/jobs from client side and distribute the regions dynamically
> > > according to the current workload of each region server, the incoming
> > > queries and data locality.
> > >
> > > Does it make sense
needs to be set accordingly.
Regards
Ram
> -Original Message-
> From: Dan Han [mailto:dannahan2...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2012 7:00 AM
> To: user@hbase.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Distribution of regions to servers
>
> Hi, Eugeny ,
>
>
>
> > On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:44 PM, Anoop Sam John
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi
> > > Can u share more details pls? What work you are doing within the CPs
> > >
> > > -Anoop-
> > >
> >
__
> > From: Dan Han [dannahan2...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 5:55 AM
> > To: user@hbase.apache.org
> > Subject: Distribution of regions to servers
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> >I am doing some experiments on HB
Can u share more details pls? What work you are doing within the CPs
>
> -Anoop-
>
> From: Dan Han [dannahan2...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 5:55 AM
> To: user@hbase.apache.org
> Subject: Distribution of regions to s
Hi
Can u share more details pls? What work you are doing within the CPs
-Anoop-
From: Dan Han [dannahan2...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 5:55 AM
To: user@hbase.apache.org
Subject: Distribution of regions to servers
Hi all,
I am doing
rg
> Subject: Distribution of regions to servers
>
> Hi all,
>
>I am doing some experiments on HBase with Coprocessor. I found that
> the
> performance
> of Coprocessor is impacted much by the distribution of the regions. I
> am
> kind of interested in
> going deep in
The assumption was that regions were not evenly distributed prior to
restarting.
If they were, user wouldn't select this policy.
We can this policy effective only once - retain assignment is selected
following this new policy.
Of course the dynamic portion of load balancer needs to select the unde
t@gmail.com [mailto:saint@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Stack
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 3:56 PM
To: user@hbase.apache.org
Subject: Re: distribution of regions to servers
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Ted Yu wrote:
> I am thinking of creating a new policy for region assignment at
>
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Ted Yu wrote:
> I am thinking of creating a new policy for region assignment at cluster
> startup which assigns regions from each table in round-robin fashion.
>
Don't we want to retain assignments on startup since that will ensure
greatest locality of data? Roun
rlottenburg, HRB 12300, München, HRB
> 6684; WEEE-Reg.-Nr. DE 23691322
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Geoff Hendrey [mailto:ghend...@decarta.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 8:34 PM
> To: hbase-u...@hadoop.apache.org
> Subject: distribution of regions to servers
>
&
lin Charlottenburg, HRB 12300, München, HRB
6684; WEEE-Reg.-Nr. DE 23691322
-Original Message-
From: Geoff Hendrey [mailto:ghend...@decarta.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 8:34 PM
To: hbase-u...@hadoop.apache.org
Subject: distribution of regions to servers
I have a table with a hundred or
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Geoff Hendrey wrote:
> You're right. I was thinking there was an Hbase balancer tool for spreading
> the table's regions around. From your response, sounds like the hbase
> balancer is just software that lives inside the Hbase master, as opposed to a
> utility th
that right?
-geoff
-Original Message-
From: saint@gmail.com [mailto:saint@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Stack
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 3:07 PM
To: user@hbase.apache.org
Cc: hbase-u...@hadoop.apache.org
Subject: Re: distribution of regions to servers
I think you are thinking o
saint@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
> Stack
> Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 2:16 PM
> To: user@hbase.apache.org
> Cc: hbase-u...@hadoop.apache.org
> Subject: Re: distribution of regions to servers
>
> Hey Geoff:
>
> Is this a 0.90.2 (or .3) hbase? It had some fixup done on t
: user@hbase.apache.org
Cc: hbase-u...@hadoop.apache.org
Subject: Re: distribution of regions to servers
Hey Geoff:
Is this a 0.90.2 (or .3) hbase? It had some fixup done on the
balancer to make it a little more random.
Otherwise, yes, a table should be better spread about the cluster.
This has come
want
> a large table with many regions to be distributed across many machines?
> Just curious to understand the nuance. If I *do* want a uniform
> distribution of regions to servers, how would I achieve it?
>
>
>
> -geoff
>
>
quot; answer to this but: wouldn't I want
a large table with many regions to be distributed across many machines?
Just curious to understand the nuance. If I *do* want a uniform
distribution of regions to servers, how would I achieve it?
-geoff
22 matches
Mail list logo
