er - here, the RegionServer(s) - have
>> > configurable intervals for keeping idle connections around. Either the
>> > client or server will eventually drop the connection. Who does it
>>depends
>> > on the configured timeouts. You can increase the defaults but
nection. Who does it
>>depends
>> > on the configured timeouts. You can increase the defaults but it
>>would be
>> > better not to hold scanner resources open.
>
>> From: apurt...@apache.org
>> Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 10:28:18 -0700
>> Subject: Re: Sta
...@apache.org
> Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 10:28:18 -0700
> Subject: Re: Stargate perf and troubleshooting tips
> To: user@hbase.apache.org
>
> No, the stateless scanner does not support filters. Is this a requirement
> for your use case?
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 7
No, the stateless scanner does not support filters. Is this a requirement
for your use case?
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 7:02 AM, SiMaYunRui wrote:
> Thanks Andrew. Does the stateless scan supports filter? I read the doc you
> referenced, but seems that only the follow parameters are supported, fil
Thanks Andrew. Does the stateless scan supports filter? I read the doc you
referenced, but seems that only the follow parameters are supported, filter is
not part of the list.
startrow - The start row for the scan.
endrow - The end row for the scan.
columns - The columns to scan.
starttime, en
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 11:20 PM, SiMaYunRui wrote:
> Further investigation showsthat if I repeatedly fetch data very quick, the
> latter scanner creations are very fast (< 100ms), but if there is >1minute
> interval between two data fetching, the latter is slow.
>
> I am certain that it’s not c
Hi all,
I am encountering a performance when building an application to scan data thru
Stargate (HBase Restful service).
Stargate asks two steps to fetch data from hbase table, the first step is to
put a scanner resource and then to get next thru another http request. My
observation is that it
