Ravi,
You can pass custom configuration as follows:
CachingProvider cachingProvider = Caching.getCachingProvider();
URI uri = URI.create("file:///path/to/your/config.xml");
CacheManager cacheMgr = cachingProvider.getCacheManager(uri,
cachingProvider.getDefaultClassLoader());
On Fri, Feb 12, 2
In my view Ignite service grid supports a lot more than Hazelcast and
provides much simpler API for it.
1. You can deploy service on any single node in the cluster, any cluster
group, or on the whole grid.
2. Ignite Service is not a wrapper around cache. It can have any user
logic wit
amit2103 wrote
> I get the idea (make the caches transactional). But I have my initial
> doubt
> Let me explain. My cluster has say 3 nodes when I start the below process
> in 1 node
> All caches are transactional.
>
>
> 1) Open transaction
> 2) Write to 1 Person cache (which is supposed to do re
how to initialize cache manager by passing configuration ignite.xml file
path?
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/intialize-the-cache-manager-tp2972.html
Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi Gareth,
Ignite's Service Grid really differs from Hazelcast SPI. From what I see
these are completely different features.
Can you please elaborate what your service does? If we know more details
about your use case, it would be easier to propose the best solution.
-Val
--
View this message
Hello,
We have an existing application which takes advantage of the Hazelcast SPI
interface. The Hazelcast SPI interface allowed us to create a quite complex
distributed service allowing us to manage our own memory, migrations and how
we would like to replicate (hazelcast just managed where partit
Hi Kobe,
Yes, I was talking about IgfsMode, sorry for the confusion. Default is
DUAL_ASYNC.
-Val
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/Immediate-flush-of-cache-into-backing-store-tp2942p2969.html
Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive
Hi Amit,
Can you please properly subscribe to the mailing list so that the community
receives email notifications? Please follow the instruction here:
http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/mailing_list/MailingListOptions.jtp?forum=1
amit2103 wrote
> Many thanks for the wonderful project
Sorry, I see a FileSystemConfiguration defaultMode property:
fs.setDefaultMode(IgfsMode.DUAL_SYNC);
What is the default value of this setting?
Thanks!
/Kobe
Kobe wrote
> Val,
>
> I assume you are referring to CacheWriteSynchronizationMode? I do not see
> the
> mode DUAL_ASYNC. I see
Val,
I assume you are referring to CacheWriteSynchronizationMode? I do not see
the
mode DUAL_ASYNC. I see only FULL_ASYNC, FULL_SYNC and PRIMARY_ASYNC.
AM I missing something?
* CacheConfiguration datacache = new CacheConfiguration ();
datacache.setName("igfs-data");
data
Hi,
No, this socket can't be reused. And you're right, server's communication
SPI can try to establish connection with the client (to port 47100 by
default).
If client is behind NAT, you can setup port forwarding on the router. You
will also have to implement AddressResolver interface and provide
Hi Tomas,
Can you please properly subscribe to the mailing list so that the community
receives email notifications? Please follow the instruction here:
http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/mailing_list/MailingListOptions.jtp?forum=1
tomascejka wrote
> Hello, I would like to know if you
Hello everyone!
I hope this email finds you well. I hope everyone is as excited about
ApacheCon as I am!
I'd like to remind you all of a couple of important dates, as well as ask for
your assistance in spreading the word! Please use your social media platform(s)
to get the word out! The more v
Hi Alexey,
Will try to extract main logic into some test that would allow to reproduce
it.
But in meanwhile I figured out that issue appears only on cache that is
store backed. I.e. as soon as I set either "readThrough" or "writeThrough"
to "false" (or both) issue disappear.
But actually in my cas
Hi Valentin,
Sorry, I realize I didn't get it right. I'm using IgniteRDD to save RDD
values now and IgniteCache to cache StructType.
I'm using a ~1mb Parquet file for testing which has ~75K rows. I noticed
that saving IgniteRDD is expensive, it takes about 4 seconds on my laptop.
I tried both cli
Dmitriy,
Let's see if we have some feedback from users (that is mostly the intention I
share here too). After that I'll call for a vote among MyBatis devs and they
will help with the release.
-Roman
On Thursday, February 11, 2016 5:39 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan
wrote:
Thanks Roman, this i
tHANKS to all
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/lock-and-unlock-the-cache-key-tp2950p2958.html
Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Ravi,
A small typo sneaked to the code snippet - the lock() call was omitted - it
should be like this (I also omitting the try-finally block for the
simplicity)
IgniteCache cache = ...;
Lock lock = cache.lock(key);
lock.lock();
// ... process while lock is held
lock.unlock();
Hello,
I have an Ignite node (IGFS caching HDFS) running on one of my servers,
close to where my data is. And I would like to have a node on my laptop to
have cached data close by. I setup the config for the node on my laptop to
have discoverySpi like this
/
Ravi,
Please clarify what long do you mean?
Here is short code snippet showing lock/unlock cycle:
IgniteCache cache = ...;
Lock lock = cache.lock(key);
lock.unlock();
Vladimir.
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 1:12 PM, Ravi wrote:
> Lock.unlock(long) here long is needed but i want unlock object as k
Lock.unlock(long) here long is needed but i want unlock object as key??
as i locked using IgniteCache.lock(key).?
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/lock-and-unlock-the-cache-key-tp2950p2954.html
Sent from the Apache Ignite Users mailing list archi
Hey Val,
Thanks for your reply, I'll try playing with the page size and see if that
helps.
Regarding the measurements, I have a metric on the app that measures the
time spent for updating the cache whenever a new event is received from the
DB. In this update I'm not only propagating the update to
Hi Ravi,
Method IgniteCache.lock(K) returns instance of Lock object. Use
Lock.unlock() on this object to unlock the key.
Vladimir.
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 10:57 AM, Ravi wrote:
> how it can be performed as i want to lock a particular key and then unlock
> it.Suggest me the way how can i check
Thanks Roman, this is awesome news!
Do you know what is the process at MyBatis to move from beta into a final
GA release?
D.
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 11:41 PM, Roman Shtykh wrote:
> Dear community,
>
> I would like to share the news about MyBatis-Ignite integration release,
> as a result of the
how it can be performed as i want to lock a particular key and then unlock
it.Suggest me the way how can i check whether key is locked or not?
cache.lock(key)- it locks the key
but how to unlock the key??
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-ignite-users.70518.x6.nabble.com/lock-and
25 matches
Mail list logo
