Re: Problems with jetty.xml

2012-12-14 Thread Achim Nierbeck
Hi Bengt, let's try to clarify this. Pax-Web starts the jetty container and configures it by 1) using the configuration through the configuration admin service. As it's a requirement by the OSGi spec that the service port is configured that way. 2) reading the jetty.xml file either through the con

Re: Problems with jetty.xml

2012-12-14 Thread Bengt Rodehav
Thanks for your reply Achim. However, I don't quite understand how this works - is this described somewhere? Things that would be nice to understand are: - What role does the jettyconfig file has? - What role does etc/jetty.xml has? Is it generated? - How is the final jetty configuration built up

Re: Problems with jetty.xml

2012-12-14 Thread Achim Nierbeck
Hi Bengt, since the Jetty.xml isn't the "lead" configuration for the jetty file and since the jetty is started in the "embedded" style you need to get a hold of this a bit different, or you use a jetty-web.xml file. I'm not sure about the right syntax right now, but since it doesn't work and the

Problems with jetty.xml

2012-12-14 Thread Bengt Rodehav
I'm running a web application on Karaf 2.2.8. I need to send quite a lot of data to the server using the POST method. I get the following error message on the web browser side: Form too large159>20 After googling I found how to reconfigure this on http://wiki.eclipse.org/Jetty/Howto/Confi

Re: Using variables in org.apache.karaf.features.cfg

2012-12-14 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Thanks Bengt, we will take a look. Regards JB On 12/14/2012 01:25 PM, Bengt Rodehav wrote: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-2060 Thanks, /Bengt 2012/12/13 Andreas Pieber mailto:anpie...@gmail.com>> I meant xxx.logging.cfg and custom.properties; was just at a customer w

Re: Using variables in org.apache.karaf.features.cfg

2012-12-14 Thread Bengt Rodehav
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-2060 Thanks, /Bengt 2012/12/13 Andreas Pieber > I meant xxx.logging.cfg and custom.properties; was just at a customer with > no local karaf to check :-) > > OK, can you please provide a bug report? I can check on it tomorrow. > > Kind regards, > And