On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 2:00 AM, Anders Nawroth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Tobias Ivarsson:
> > depending on aspect. It works like this: a node x reached through a
> > relationship with RelationshipType L is said to represent a data entity
> of
> > type V,
>
> Thinking about this, I maybe
Hi!
Tobias Ivarsson:
> depending on aspect. It works like this: a node x reached through a
> relationship with RelationshipType L is said to represent a data entity of
> type V,
Thinking about this, I maybe should reverse the direction of the
relationships of type PART_OF_NAME in this context:
Peter Neubauer skrev:
> sounds good. Dunno why the Icons are not showing up and the name is
> nto something meaningful. Maybe you can investigate?
>
I have to finish off things in my pipeline first, like getting the IMDB
example 1.0 out. But it's getting closer ...
/anders
__
Hi,
I've been experimenting with the traversal functionality, and some of the
path finder algorithms based on it, and I have some suggestions.
i) Currently you can specify the type and direction of a relationship to
traverse. Is there any reason the evaluator approach wasn't used here? For
exampl
Ok,
sounds good. Dunno why the Icons are not showing up and the name is
nto something meaningful. Maybe you can investigate?
/peter
http://www.oredev.se - Be there or be gone.
GTalk:neubauer.peter
Skypepeter.neubauer
ICQ18762544
Phone +46704 106975
LinkedIn ht
5 matches
Mail list logo