Re: [Neo] RelationshipType but no NodeType

2008-10-23 Thread Tobias Ivarsson
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 2:00 AM, Anders Nawroth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > Hi! > > Tobias Ivarsson: > > depending on aspect. It works like this: a node x reached through a > > relationship with RelationshipType L is said to represent a data entity > of > > type V, > > Thinking about this, I maybe

Re: [Neo] RelationshipType but no NodeType

2008-10-23 Thread Anders Nawroth
Hi! Tobias Ivarsson: > depending on aspect. It works like this: a node x reached through a > relationship with RelationshipType L is said to represent a data entity of > type V, Thinking about this, I maybe should reverse the direction of the relationships of type PART_OF_NAME in this context:

Re: [Neo] Neoclipse export as product someone?

2008-10-23 Thread Anders Nawroth
Peter Neubauer skrev: > sounds good. Dunno why the Icons are not showing up and the name is > nto something meaningful. Maybe you can investigate? > I have to finish off things in my pipeline first, like getting the IMDB example 1.0 out. But it's getting closer ... /anders __

[Neo] Traversal suggestions

2008-10-23 Thread Jonny Wray
Hi, I've been experimenting with the traversal functionality, and some of the path finder algorithms based on it, and I have some suggestions. i) Currently you can specify the type and direction of a relationship to traverse. Is there any reason the evaluator approach wasn't used here? For exampl

Re: [Neo] Neoclipse export as product someone?

2008-10-23 Thread Peter Neubauer
Ok, sounds good. Dunno why the Icons are not showing up and the name is nto something meaningful. Maybe you can investigate? /peter http://www.oredev.se - Be there or be gone. GTalk:neubauer.peter Skypepeter.neubauer ICQ18762544 Phone +46704 106975 LinkedIn ht