Hi! Tobias Ivarsson: > depending on aspect. It works like this: a node x reached through a > relationship with RelationshipType L is said to represent a data entity of > type V,
Thinking about this, I maybe should reverse the direction of the relationships of type PART_OF_NAME in this context: http://wiki.neo4j.org/images/5/55/Imdb.screenshot.johan.png WDYT? Would it make it more clear regarding the corresponding entities? BTW, really nice explanation of the power of using relationship types! :-) /anders _______________________________________________ Neo mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
