On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 2:00 AM, Anders Nawroth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Hi! > > Tobias Ivarsson: > > depending on aspect. It works like this: a node x reached through a > > relationship with RelationshipType L is said to represent a data entity > of > > type V, > > Thinking about this, I maybe should reverse the direction of the > relationships of type PART_OF_NAME in this context: > > http://wiki.neo4j.org/images/5/55/Imdb.screenshot.johan.png > > WDYT? Would it make it more clear regarding the corresponding entities? I think the direction is good, it corresponds to the semantics of the graph, and to the most common traversal direction. What you might want to change, if you don't think it feels right as it currently is, is the name of the relationship type -- Tobias Ivarsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Hacker, Neo Technology www.neotechnology.com Cellphone: +46 706 534857 _______________________________________________ Neo mailing list User@lists.neo4j.org https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
