Re: [Neo4j] Best practise for multi language properties

2011-10-07 Thread Moootron
-Original Message- > From: user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org [mailto:user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org] On > Behalf Of Michael Hunger > Sent: Friday, October 07, 2011 8:07 AM > To: Neo4j user discussions > Subject: Re: [Neo4j] Best practise for multi language properties > > You mean some

Re: [Neo4j] Best practise for multi language properties

2011-10-07 Thread Rick Bullotta
fault. -Original Message- From: user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org [mailto:user-boun...@lists.neo4j.org] On Behalf Of Michael Hunger Sent: Friday, October 07, 2011 8:07 AM To: Neo4j user discussions Subject: Re: [Neo4j] Best practise for multi language properties You mean something

Re: [Neo4j] Best practise for multi language properties

2011-10-07 Thread Michael Hunger
You mean something like internationalization? I don't know if that itself is a responsibility of the datamode/graph. You could probably use string arrays to store those. Or do you mean multi-language property names? Cheers Michael, Dresden,Germany Am 07.10.2011 um 09:24 schrieb Moootron: > B

[Neo4j] Best practise for multi language properties

2011-10-07 Thread Moootron
Best Practice for multilanguage properties Just a few month I am working with neo4j. We are modeling graphs for new Applications combining ontologies and data for production data. The most important thing actually is to have multi language properties for nodes and relations with the following m