Jacopo, all,
Could we have a possible links to detailled pages ? Those pages could turn to
be places to centralise information about a topic
using detailled descriptions or links to Nabble Threads, Jira issues, etc.
Jacques
- Message d'origine -
De : Jacopo Cappellato [EMAIL
Thanks Philip,
I will put that in my tips
Jacques
De : Phillip Rhodes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I figured it out and got it working.
What helped me was to follow the setup for how the webstore shows the
policies.
I had to edit the files controller.xml and CommonScreens.xml (look for
policies
I would appreciate it someone could give me a thumbs up on this one, since I am
new and flying solo for this project. I have a gift-basket that is available
in 2 sizes, small and large. Each size is priced differently. It's important
that the user can easily choose which size from the
Yes you are on the right way.
Jacques
De : Phillip Rhodes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I would appreciate it someone could give me a thumbs up on this one, since I
am new and flying solo for this project. I have a
gift-basket that is available in 2 sizes, small and large. Each size is priced
David E Jones wrote:
On Oct 26, 2007, at 4:01 PM, Brendan Vogt wrote:
How would I implement URL rewriting in Ofbiz? I don't like the URLs
that it
generates. It's ugly and not neat.
Could you be more specific?
-David
Use this, works a treat: http://tuckey.org/urlrewrite/
Calum
Now that the ver 4.0 app is in full swing with my client
I am getting bug reports.
It seems there is a push not to have these put in for ver4.0
should I put them only for the Trunk?
Does this change the priority of getting them fixed if not in the ver 4.0?
vamsi sent the following on 10/26/2007
ooops sorry changed the subject.
BJ Freeman sent the following on 10/27/2007 12:01 PM:
Now that the ver 4.0 app is in full swing with my client
I am getting bug reports.
It seems there is a push not to have these put in for ver4.0
should I put them only for the Trunk?
Does this change the
On Oct 27, 2007, at 1:05 PM, BJ Freeman wrote:
ooops sorry changed the subject.
BJ Freeman sent the following on 10/27/2007 12:01 PM:
Now that the ver 4.0 app is in full swing with my client
I am getting bug reports.
It seems there is a push not to have these put in for ver4.0
What leads
Could be that we need two demos
one for the Trunk and one for the Ver 4.0 which is the most stable
release we have.
Since the Trunk, is susceptible to breakage, and the Clients will not
get what they see in the trunk in the ver 4.0 release Would it not be
more advisable to have the default Demo
My client
David E Jones sent the following on 10/27/2007 12:13 PM:
On Oct 27, 2007, at 1:05 PM, BJ Freeman wrote:
ooops sorry changed the subject.
BJ Freeman sent the following on 10/27/2007 12:01 PM:
Now that the ver 4.0 app is in full swing with my client
I am getting bug reports.
It
This sounds like a good idea. I have still an old demo server (a bit outdated
but...). I updated Ubuntu 6.06 2 weeks ago and since
it runs anymore (I have no screen, only thru VNC). I will get it to reboot and
it could be used for one or the other. I will have
also to put Apache in front using
Have many boxes that can be used, once I find a way to hook them back
up to the Internet.
that may not be soon
:(
Jacques Le Roux sent the following on 10/27/2007 2:04 PM:
This sounds like a good idea. I have still an old demo server (a bit outdated
but...). I updated Ubuntu 6.06 2 weeks ago
think they will look at it if it is broke?
Scott Gray sent the following on 10/27/2007 2:40 PM:
The demo is for a first look before taking the time to download OFBiz,
not for client evaluations. Your probably better off sitting a laptop
in front of your client with 4.0 loaded.
Regards
I'd probably rather see it stay with the trunk since there are always
new things going that shouldn't be going into the 4.0 release
branch. I'm open for talking about hosting another one of these as
well, but I doubt that you'd run into that many times where there are
issues like we've
Scott,
You don't have always your client in front of you (in my case it's even rare).
And I found often myself having to run release4.0 and
trunk simultaneously. I have enough version loaded on with differents set of
ports my dev.machine to do that. But I find the idea of
having 2 demo servers
I don't think you would say this if you have used Ubuntu. And if you
install 7.10, you can also have all eye candy things you see in Vista of
course without degrading the performance.
Eclipse runs best on Ubuntu.
Thanks,
Raj
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jacques
Me too. Windows is the best
Eclipse has a help system built in. Goto help and look for workbench
basics. You can also try cheatsheets. Cheatsheets guide you step by step
to perform various tasks in Eclipse. Also look at the perspective. FIXME
and TODOs are reminders to developers of pending tasks. You don't need
to worry
Remote demos is my case 90% of the time. I also send them to the demo
and they come back with it did not work.
this is my concern about having a dynamic demo (trunk) that represents ofiz.
Jacques Le Roux sent the following on 10/27/2007 2:52 PM:
Scott,
You don't have always your client in
De : Raj Saini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I don't think you would say this if you have used Ubuntu. And if you
install 7.10, you can also have all eye candy things you see in Vista of
course without degrading the performance.
Eclipse runs best on Ubuntu.
That's so true ! And I think the disk system
I wonder if the main problem of Brendan is he don't like to read documentations
and use helps ;o)
A typical Windows's user syndrom (I'm a bit like that too ;o)
Jacques
De : Raj Saini [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Eclipse has a help system built in. Goto help and look for workbench
basics. You can also
The connection has timed out
The server at lamouline.myvnc.com is taking too long to respond.
Jacques Le Roux sent the following on 10/27/2007 4:17 PM:
It's up again : trunk not updated since 20 august (rev. 567634) :
https://lamouline.myvnc.com:8443/catalog/control/main
Jacques
De :
Clarification, you are doing this thru the UI
Phillip Rhodes sent the following on 10/27/2007 5:45 PM:
I am trying to manually setup something like the Open Gizmo product that
contains a dropdown containing licences.
I have a License displayed in the drop down, but I can not get the
Yes, I am doing this through the Catalog manager UI.
- Original Message -
From: BJ Freeman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: user@ofbiz.apache.org
Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2007 8:51:41 PM (GMT-0500) America/New_York
Subject: Re: Cannot duplicate Open Gizmo Example
Clarification, you are doing
One last piece of wierdness.
While the select box is empty of the my feature values
The bottom of the product page contains a listing of the features.
It would be the same thing as if the Open Gizmo select box being empty, but
still displaying to the user the images below for BSD, LGPL, etc..
Not sure if it will help but you could try removing that Test-Large
variant you've got it there, it might be confusing things.
Scott
On 28/10/2007, Phillip Rhodes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One last piece of wierdness.
While the select box is empty of the my feature values
The bottom of the
Yes, I added that while I was playing around trying to get it to work.
It's removed, restarted ofbiz (just to be on the safe side).
Still exhibiting the same problem.
- Original Message -
From: Scott Gray [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: user@ofbiz.apache.org
Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2007
Hi Phillip,
I was Vadoing the similar things and I took the Open Gizmo and Large
Widget example to start with. I did thought the xml data load. Best way
(in my opinion) is to make a copy of the existing stuff in the file
(Features, Feature Categories, Product Association etc), modify to suite
My first guess is that you have created the virtual product (ok), then
you have associated selectable features to it (ok) but you are probably
missing the last step: go to the variants tab (the last in the tabs of
the virtual product) and create the variant products (if you check the
boxes the
28 matches
Mail list logo
