The automation of multi tenancy setup could happen through deployment
scripts instead of OFBiz itself. So yes the tenants would have their own
install, but I don't see why they'd have their own server farm.
On Wed, Sep 5, 2018, 4:15 AM wrote:
> So if you don't have multi-tenancy does that mean
Rishi - So does it give you the ability to purchase in one UOM and sell
in another OOTB?
So I buy quantity of 1 which will potentially put 100 in inventory
Original Message
Subject: Re: Purchase order minimum and packing units
From: Rishi Solanki
Date: Tue, September 04,
So if you don't have multi-tenancy does that mean every tenant has their
own install of OFbiz, their own install of Postgres SQL, and their own
server farm?
Original Message
Subject: Re: Should we keep the multi-tenants feature in OFBiz?
From: Taher Alkhateeb
Date: Tue,
The question is: is it worth keeping it? To answer this question,
perhaps we need to perhaps look at the pros and cons
pros of keeping multi-tenancy:
- less memory consumption.
- less storage consumption.
- single deployment (less effort)
cons of keeping multi-tenancy:
- Inflexibility: all
My opinion is to just completely ditch the multi tenant code since it seems
to be more trouble than it's worth. Anyone serious about designing a
system to support a similar concept would do it their own way anyway, most
likely using completely separate DBs. Face it, using a common DB and share
Hi Frank,
As shared by Suraj, I'm up for using the quantity UOM over marketing
package. Also Agreement is best suited for the minimum order amount.
So I would go with Suraj's suggestion.
HTH!
Rishi Solanki
Sr Manager, Enterprise Software Development
HotWax Systems Pvt. Ltd.
Direct:
Hi Frank,
For packing units, IMO, there could be two possible solution for this case.
One is to setup product in OFBiz of type marketing package (if supplier
have multiple packing quantities this fits best), this is available OOTB
and services available to decompose marketing package into
Hi Rishi,
Thank you for your reply. I see there are two fields: 'units included' and
'order qty increments', should I use the latter in my case? It is not that we
order 1 product which contain 6 products, but that we are required to purchase
them per 6. So the costprice of the product is the
