s
These are my initial thoughts so I'm happy to get any feedback or
alternative suggestions for how we could solve our existing problems.
Thanks
Sharan
--
View this message in context:
http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSSION-OFBiz-Online-Documentation-tp4668869.html
Sent from the OFBiz
versions
>
> These are my initial thoughts so I'm happy to get any feedback or
> alternative suggestions for how we could solve our existing problems.
>
> Thanks
> Sharan
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSSION-OFBiz-Online-Documentation-tp4668869.html
> Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
at once we have had the
discussion about that and reach a concensus can we start discussions around
the technology and options to achieve it.
Thanks
Sharan
--
View this message in context:
http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSSION-OFBiz-Online-Documentation-tp4668869p4669054.html
Sent from
t; discussion about that and reach a concensus can we start discussions around
> the technology and options to achieve it.
>
> Thanks
> Sharan
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSSION-OFBiz-Online-Documentation-tp4668869p4669054.html
> Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi Sharan,
I had not the time to think more about your proposal but I can quickly
answer your followup questions, see inline...
Am 27.05.15 um 15:34 schrieb Sharan-F:
Hi All
I'm still looking for some community feedback on this proposal and approach
and now I have a couple of extra questions
On 27/05/2015 10:50 AM, Michael Brohl wrote:
Hi Sharan,
I had not the time to think more about your proposal but I can quickly
answer your followup questions, see inline...
Am 27.05.15 um 15:34 schrieb Sharan-F:
Hi All
I'm still looking for some community feedback on this proposal and
appr
logy and options to achieve it.
Thanks
Sharan
--
View this message in context:
http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSSION-OFBiz-Online-Documentation-tp4668869p4669054.html
Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
That sounds quite an interesting way Ron.
I also believe we should get rid of DocBook in favour of DITTA or maybe even AsciiDoc (the last smart guy) as we already discussed at the bottom of
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4941
I also like the idea of separating the documentation from
- Original Message -
From: "Jacques Le Roux"
To: user@ofbiz.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, 28 May, 2015 12:51:13 PM
Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] OFBiz Online Documentation
That sounds quite an interesting way Ron.
I also believe we should get rid of DocBook in favour of DITTA or maybe even
autiful, mature and well supported in terms of tools and probably
covers the 90% of cases needed by everyone. So throwing another suggestion in
the mix.
Taher Alkhateeb
- Original Message -
From: "Jacques Le Roux"
To: user@ofbiz.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, 28 May, 2015 12:51:13
- Original Message -
From: "Jacques Le Roux"
To: user@ofbiz.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, 28 May, 2015 12:51:13 PM
Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] OFBiz Online Documentation
That sounds quite an interesting way Ron.
I also believe we should get rid of DocBook in favour of DITTA or maybe
er@ofbiz.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, 28 May, 2015 12:51:13 PM
Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] OFBiz Online Documentation
That sounds quite an interesting way Ron.
I also believe we should get rid of DocBook in favour of DITTA or maybe even
AsciiDoc (the last smart guy) as we already discussed at the b
t;> and probably covers the 90% of cases needed by everyone. So throwing
>>>> another suggestion in the mix.
>>>>
>>>> Taher Alkhateeb
>>>>
>>>> - Original Message -
>>>>
>>>> From: "Jacques Le Roux&
the online help, updating it and then packaging it as a separate
>>> project deliverable that can be easily integrated back into OFBiz?
>>>
>>> I'm focussing on the approach first. I think that once we have had the
>>> discussion about that and reach a concens
;> tools and probably covers the 90% of cases needed by everyone. So
>>>> throwing another suggestion in the mix.
>>>>
>>>> Taher Alkhateeb
>>>>
>>>> - Original Message -
>>>>
>>>> From: "Jacques Le Roux&q
Todd,
do you mean this Prezi
http://prezi.com/qqp54gt46pn_/apache-ofbiz-development/ from Jad El Omeiri?
Am 28.05.15 um 16:52 schrieb Todd Thorner:
I'm pretty much sitting this one out (seems to have jumped right into
the tech selection and I don't understand OFBiz well enough yet to be
usef
I have yet to take a look (or another look), but that seems about right
(I think the presentation was mainly about data models). Is Mr. El
Omeiri still active on this ml?
Also, the anal part of me needs to edit my bit about editing skills to
read "editing skill." Ha.
On 15-05-28 08:07 AM, Mic
;
To: user@ofbiz.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, 28 May, 2015 12:51:13 PM
Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] OFBiz Online Documentation
That sounds quite an interesting way Ron.
I also believe we should get rid of DocBook in favour of DITTA or
maybe even AsciiDoc (the last smart guy) as we already discussed at
t
--- Original Message -
From: "Jacques Le Roux"
To: user@ofbiz.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, 28 May, 2015 12:51:13 PM
Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] OFBiz Online Documentation
That sounds quite an interesting way Ron.
I also believe we should get rid of DocBook in favour of DITTA or maybe eve
Le 31/05/2015 14:41, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
It is going to be much better for Integrators that need to produce marketing materials, RFP responses and custom end-user documentation that could
be largely composed of topics from the shared OFBiz library of topics simply by defining a map that cal
On 31/05/2015 8:42 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Le 31/05/2015 14:41, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
It is going to be much better for Integrators that need to produce
marketing materials, RFP responses and custom end-user documentation
that could be largely composed of topics from the shared OFBiz
li
Thanks Ron,
That's interesting but seems quite a lot of work, not sure the community will
commit to provide it... Let's see...
I also wonder if this could not be done with DocBook or AsciiDoc. What is
specific to DITA that 2 other systems have not to do the same?
Thanks
Jacques
Le 31/05/20
http://thecontentwrangler.com/2008/04/11/choosing_an_xml_schema_docbook_or_dita/
I am feel that AsciiDoc is too much like a wiki tool
- no validation so you have to read the output to know if you are right.
- IDEs used by most developers can auto-validate XML and provide code
completion so DITA
Thanks Ron,
It's clearer now. With Taher's document about DITA tags, I'm more inclined
about it now.
Looking forward for your POC.
Jacques
Le 07/06/2015 20:21, Ron Wheeler a écrit :
http://thecontentwrangler.com/2008/04/11/choosing_an_xml_schema_docbook_or_dita/
I am feel that AsciiDoc is t
that can be easily integrated back into OFBiz?
I'm focussing on the approach first. I think that once we have had the
discussion about that and reach a concensus can we start discussions around
the technology and options to achieve it.
Thanks
Sharan
--
View this message in context:
http:/
t discussions around
the technology and options to achieve it.
Thanks
Sharan
--
View this message in context:
http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/DISCUSSION-OFBiz-Online-Documentation-tp4668869p4669054.html
Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
26 matches
Mail list logo
