9.04. So, ¿When
will
Ofbiz
try a new stable release version?.
Gracias/Thank You.
--
Juan Pablo
--
View this message in context:
http://n4.nabble.com/New-OFBiz-stable-release-tp963922p1675843.html
Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
will
Ofbiz
try a new stable release version?.
Gracias/Thank You.
--
Juan Pablo
--
View this message in context:
http://n4.nabble.com/New-OFBiz-stable-release-tp963922p1675843.html
Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
components. The last stable versión is actually 9.04. So, ¿When
will
Ofbiz
try a new stable release version?.
Gracias/Thank You.
--
Juan Pablo
--
View this message in context:
http://n4.nabble.com/New-OFBiz-stable-release-tp963922p1675843.html
--
View this message in context:
http://n4.nabble.com/New-OFBiz-stable-release-tp963922p1675843.html
Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
release version?.
Gracias/Thank You.
--
Juan Pablo
--
View this message in context:
http://n4.nabble.com/New-OFBiz-stable-release-tp963922p1675843.html
Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-OFBiz-stable-release-tp963922p1675843.html
Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Yes, I'd like to commit at least all about the layered lookups
Jacques
From: Bruno Busco bruno.bu...@gmail.com
JIRA says we have this in progress:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=truepid=12310500status=3
I guess there is more.
I have created the Release
JIRA says we have this in progress:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=truepid=12310500status=3
I guess there is more.
I have created the Release Candidate Branch 10.04 version in JIRA.
We could schedule issues/tasks we want to include in the relase to this JIRA
Anil,
Just scratching the surface: this looks like a very good idea to me.
Thanks for the initiative, I may help when I will get more time.
Jacques
From: Anil Patel anil.pa...@hotwaxmedia.com
This makes me think, What does a stable release mean to people?
Ofbiz is such a big software with
Hi BJ,
Then Selenium should be the way...
Jacques
From: BJ Freeman bjf...@free-man.net
Those type of tests were not what I had in mind.
they are modular so are not dependent on the previous modules.
first the order is read in using all the services that would be used to
receive an order, no
On Wed, 2010-02-24 at 08:22 +0100, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
Are you planning to fix them or to donate some resources (developers and/or
money) in order to fix them? Or are you asking other to do this?
BTW, do you really think that commercial or open source releases are done
when companies
Thanks I guess it is time to think about changing over from my Windows
based testing tool to selenium.
found some youtube tutorials.
under
selenium testing
Maybe make some video on ofbiz to get more involvement.
see what i can salvage.
I guess to make the java code so can fit into the Junit tests
I think that we are all close to the same idea.
Only a little bit is missing:
what we call now Release branch should be renamed to Release
Candidate branch.
This would mean that what is contained in that branch is somewhat that
is going through the release process (testing, bug fixing,
It would be nice to get the new security code included in the branch -
even if it is disabled. That will give release users an introduction to
it and give them a chance to work on an upgrade strategy.
-Adrian
Anil Patel wrote:
So, are we set for next Ofbiz Branch named 10.04 ?
If we decide
Also I'd like to commit all the work around the layered lookups. It's pretty
advanced, should be this weekend normally
Jacques
From: Adrian Crum adri...@hlmksw.com
It would be nice to get the new security code included in the branch - even if it is disabled. That will give release users an
Makes sense to me. If we are decided on date, we still have a month to go.
Gives plenty of time, may be :)
Thanks and Regards
Anil Patel
HotWax Media Inc
Find us on the web at www.hotwaxmedia.com or Google Keyword ofbiz
On Feb 23, 2010, at 10:40 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
It would be nice to get
Jacques,
This is big one. With new backend theme and other UI goodies, Next release
should be well accepted by community.
Thanks and Regards
Anil Patel
HotWax Media Inc
Find us on the web at www.hotwaxmedia.com or Google Keyword ofbiz
On Feb 23, 2010, at 10:59 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Also
Hi Anil:
I'm not sure how to read the Jira issue report, so maybe you can help me
understand this. If I look at the Jira issues page
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ, it says that there are 585
open issues of which 283 are considered critical. Is this true? I mean
is it true that
One quick thing to note, that seems to be confused here: the release branch is
a tool for stabilization. It's great to do testing and fixing in the trunk, but
the goal for a release branch is not to be tested and bug-free from day one,
but rather to be stable so that real testing and bug
Ruth,
I don't know which statement are you talking about. Can you please put that
statement or non-statement here for ready reference?
Thanks and Regards
Anil Patel
HotWax Media Inc
Find us on the web at www.hotwaxmedia.com or Google Keyword ofbiz
On Feb 23, 2010, at 3:46 PM, Ruth Hoffman
I don't think it contradicts anything. David summarized the release
strategy in response to the general theme of this thread - which is to
stabilize (or bug fix) the trunk before a release branch is created.
The point is, that effort isn't really necessary. We can create a
release branch at
Hi Tim:
I'm hardly ever right. And with all due respect, could we just stick
to the original topic?
Just to clear the air and set the record straight: What I was asking for
was a clear and unambiguous statement from the project concerning what
is meant by stable release so that
Hi Adrian:
With all due respect, (and I do have much respect for the contributions
you and other committer's have made to the project) this statement just
confirms my developer's playground theory. I wish you guys could see
yourselves the way the rest of the world does.
I think I've said
If one follows the dev and commits, you will see that patches that fixed
bugs in trunk were, when plausible, back ported to 9.04
Also bugs fixes were put in 9.04 all you have to do is look at 9.04 history.
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=772899
Your approach reminds me of conspiracy theorists: When faced with
overwhelming evidence to the contrary, they continue to believe in their
conspiracies.
If thinking that way makes you happy, then so be it.
-Adrian
Ruth Hoffman wrote:
Hi Adrian:
With all due respect, (and I do have much
Thanks BJ - having the real information is always helpful
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Feb 23, 2010, at 2:47 PM, BJ Freeman wrote:
If one follows the dev and commits, you will see that patches that fixed
bugs in trunk were, when plausible, back ported to 9.04
Also bugs fixes were put in 9.04 all you
I partially agree with your ruth.
before 4.0
was release I stopped the trunk and made my own.
I worked at testing and stablialising.
the problem was there was no way to feed this back to the community
because the trunk had advance to the ponit my fixes would not work.
Now we have branches.
the
In what way?
I think this is totally consistent with the Release Plan document, but maybe
you're seeing something I'm not?
-David
On Feb 23, 2010, at 1:46 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
Doesn't this contradict previous statements or non-statements about bug fixes
in Release 9.04?
Regards,
What I'm telling you is that we may never be at a completely stable release, by
your definition, unless we stop moving - which as I committer, I do not think
will ever happen. What I can say is that we would like to make branch - and
stabilize it - and by some chance - get to a point where we
This makes me think, What does a stable release mean to people?
Ofbiz is such a big software with so many different ways of using it, for me
its nearly impossible to say with confidence that its ready for release.
Instead I will prefer to say, We have tested following processes in Ofbiz and
the top level tests
1) does an order, that is complete, come out in the GL properly
2) same for Purchase Order.
3) does a years worth for transactions balance.
Anil Patel sent the following on 2/23/2010 2:43 PM:
This makes me think, What does a stable release mean to people?
Ofbiz is such a
BJ,
All these work OOTB even today. Will you take that statement?
We need real details that will allow writing Unit Tests and Selenium tests and
at times have developer do tests and be able to reproduce results.
Thanks and Regards
Anil Patel
HotWax Media Inc
Find us on the web at
can you give me a lead in to those, what is the top Junit for those three.
Anil Patel sent the following on 2/23/2010 2:54 PM:
BJ,
All these work OOTB even today. Will you take that statement?
We need real details that will allow writing Unit Tests and Selenium tests
and at times have
Look for contents in
OrderTest.xml
accountingtests.xml
invoicetests.xml
paymenttests.xml
Please give details what is not covered here and you will like see added.
Thanks and Regards
Anil Patel
HotWax Media Inc
Find us on the web at www.hotwaxmedia.com or Google Keyword ofbiz
On Feb 23, 2010,
Those type of tests were not what I had in mind.
they are modular so are not dependent on the previous modules.
first the order is read in using all the services that would be used to
receive an order, no stuffing data into an entity.
I am talking about starting with a order then doing all the
On Feb 23, 2010, at 9:35 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
Hi Anil:
I'm not sure how to read the Jira issue report, so maybe you can help me
understand this. If I look at the Jira issues page
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ, it says that there are 585 open
issues of which 283 are
So, are we set for next Ofbiz Branch named 10.04 ?
If we decide on _date_, I can have a team of developers scheduled to start
testing branch code. This will allow to quickly stabilize ofbiz release for
common ecommerce use.
How about EOD March 31st 10 GMT?
Thanks and Regards
Anil Patel
HotWax
On 23/02/2010 05:11, Anil Patel wrote:
So, are we set for next Ofbiz Branch named 10.04 ?
If we decide on _date_, I can have a team of developers scheduled to start
testing branch code. This will allow to quickly stabilize ofbiz release for
common ecommerce use.
How about EOD March 31st 10
I think its time to start thinking on the things that should be taken
care in / before release branch 10.04.
Bug fixing should be the major area which should be taken care
extensively in next two months.
What about new features etc. etc.?
Please comment.
Thanks!
--
Ashish
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009
I expect to fulfill
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3442
and maybe
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3445
In other word to use layer lookups instead of popup lookups everywhere it's
possible in OFBiz.
From my 1st serie of tests it seems to work well almost everywhere,
In order to have this kind of issue scheduling could you please create
a new OFBIZ version in jira and set the Fix Version of these issue on
that?
I do not see any clearer way to answer to Ashish question.
-Bruno
2010/2/15 Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com:
I expect to fulfill
I agree but after Jacopo's message on dev ML about new release strategy (on
which I mostly agree) I will at least delay it...
Jacques
From: Bruno Busco bruno.bu...@gmail.com
In order to have this kind of issue scheduling could you please create
a new OFBIZ version in jira and set the Fix
Hello Community.
I'm testing the last trunk version and the demo version published in
Internet (http://demo.ofbiz.org). They've got new functionality: help on
line, new themes, new features in accounting, manufacturing and ordermgr
components. The last stable versión is actually 9.04. So, ¿When
There is no set date yet. The last release was in April 2009 (hence the version
number of 09.04 on it), and the one before that was about 2 years before.
Chances are it won't be another 2 years before another release, but probably at
least a year... so perhaps we'll do another release branch
Its good to know that people have interest in release version. Lots of new
features were added since last release, It will be good to do next one in April
2010.
Thanks and Regards
Anil Patel
HotWax Media Inc
Find us on the web at www.hotwaxmedia.com or Google Keyword ofbiz
On Dec 14, 2009, at
Yes, yearly sounds reasonnable (I guess we will not slow the pace)
Jacques
From: Anil Patel anil.pa...@hotwaxmedia.com
Its good to know that people have interest in release version. Lots of new features were added since last release, It will be good
to do next one in April 2010.
Thanks and
+1.
--
Ashish
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Jacques Le Roux
jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com wrote:
Yes, yearly sounds reasonnable (I guess we will not slow the pace)
Jacques
From: Anil Patel anil.pa...@hotwaxmedia.com
Its good to know that people have interest in release version. Lots
47 matches
Mail list logo
