Hi su2,
If you see the records in the party entity of the same party, they all are
of type PartyGroups in role of TAX_AUTHORITY.
Here the partyId field (pk in Party entity) is self explain its purpose, The
first half is the state name and another half is the company name (not
exactly but we can
Any other view
Rishi Solanki
Enterprise Software Developer
HotWax Media Pvt. Ltd.
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 7:51 PM, Rishi Solanki rishisolan...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi su2,
If you see the records in the party entity of the same party, they all are
of type PartyGroups in role of
Shuchi,
The field you are talking about is taxAuthPartyId. So, NY_DTF, CA_BOE and
UT_TAXMAN are partyId's for PartyGroups corresponding to the Government
entity responsibly for taxation in that particular state. For example, the
government entity which does taxation in New York (NY) is
Hi Rishi,
Thank you for your explanation.
So that means let say I create/change NY partyID in Party Entity from NY_DTF
to NY_ABC, and changing taxAuthPartyId in TaxAuthority entitiy to NY_ABC,
there should not be any issue right? (what I understood is, its just the
matter of how we name
Perfect Mridul, Thank you so much. It is clear now. And I suppose for other
states its TAXMAN as generic name.
Thank you.
Mridul Pathak-2 wrote:
Shuchi,
The field you are talking about is taxAuthPartyId. So, NY_DTF, CA_BOE and
UT_TAXMAN are partyId's for PartyGroups corresponding to the
