All,
We have a LIVE application in which the VISIT AND VISITOR entities have
grown to over 19 and 18 million rows respectively.
Has anyone experienced any performance issues when these entities have grown
to such capacity?
We recently had a performance issue and decided to turn off the
AND VISITOR entities have
grown to over 19 and 18 million rows respectively.
Has anyone experienced any performance issues when these entities have grown
to such capacity?
We recently had a performance issue and decided to turn off the visit
history feature until this feature can be ruled out as
ov 24, 2015 at 7:48 AM, Len Shein wrote:
> All,
>
> We have a LIVE application in which the VISIT AND VISITOR entities
> have grown to over 19 and 18 million rows respectively.
>
> Has anyone experienced any performance issues when these entities have
> grown to such capacit
AM, Len Shein wrote:
> All,
>
> We have a LIVE application in which the VISIT AND VISITOR entities have
> grown to over 19 and 18 million rows respectively.
>
> Has anyone experienced any performance issues when these entities have
> grown
> to such capacity?
>
>
>
t: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 11:13 AM
To: user@ofbiz.apache.org
Subject: Re: VISIT and VISITOR Entities
Did the setting change improve performance?
You could write a service that deletes data older than xxx days, then make it a
scheduled job.
Adrian Crum
Sandglass Software
www.sandglass-software.
y, November 24, 2015 11:13 AM
To: user@ofbiz.apache.org
Subject: Re: VISIT and VISITOR Entities
Did the setting change improve performance?
You could write a service that deletes data older than xxx days, then make it a
scheduled job.
Adrian Crum
Sandglass Software
www.sandglass-software.com
On 1
Nick
-Original Message-
From: Adrian Crum [mailto:adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 11:58 AM
To: user@ofbiz.apache.org
Subject: Re: VISIT and VISITOR Entities
Hmmm... it could be the job scheduler. It was refactored a few years ago to fix
problems like t
ing up in the OFBiz Cache maintenance page.
> Nick
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike [mailto:mz4whee...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 11:31 AM
> To: user
> Subject: Re: VISIT and VISITOR Entities
>
> Most likely this table is stealing cache memory f
Got it, thanks Mike.
Nick
-Original Message-
From: Mike [mailto:mz4whee...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 12:23 PM
To: user
Subject: Re: VISIT and VISITOR Entities
> at least not OFBiz cache since
I didn't mean the ofbiz cache. I meant the database (mysql/
, 2015 12:23 PM
To: user
Subject: Re: VISIT and VISITOR Entities
at least not OFBiz cache since
I didn't mean the ofbiz cache. I meant the database (mysql/postgres) cache
settings.
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 8:34 AM, Nick Rosser wrote:
Thanks Mike -- don't think this is a cache is
Thanks Mike -- don't think this is a cache issue -- at least not OFBiz
>> cache since it is not showing up in the OFBiz Cache maintenance page.
>> Nick
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Mike [mailto:mz4whee...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, Novemb
11 matches
Mail list logo