RE: JSF 1.1 vs. JSF 1.2

2007-01-18 Thread Gary VanMatre
>From: "Kito D. Mann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > I didn't explain myself clearly, I'd prefer to use Shale in > > either case. > > My problem is that I may be stuck in Tomcat 5.5.17, which > > (for me) would necessitate using JSF 1.1. > > > > I need to decide if yesterday's setup is good e

RE: JSF 1.1 vs. JSF 1.2

2007-01-18 Thread Kito D. Mann
> > I didn't explain myself clearly, I'd prefer to use Shale in > either case. > My problem is that I may be stuck in Tomcat 5.5.17, which > (for me) would necessitate using JSF 1.1. > > I need to decide if yesterday's setup is good enough, or if > it's worth pushing my employers really hard

Swallowed Exceptions?

2007-01-18 Thread Reynolds, James
I have a Shale 1.0.3 + Facelets + JSF 1.1 setup running nicely. However, I observed a disconcerting problem. I neglected to package a necessary library (buisness code, not framework code) with my project and then ran the application. Normally, a bone-headed move like this would be rewarded with

RE: JSF 1.1 vs. JSF 1.2

2007-01-18 Thread Reynolds, James
> If you want to run JSF 1.2 on Tomcat, you really want 6.0 not 5.5. It >might >be technically feasible to hack together a JSF 1.2 implementation that >would >execute on Tomcat 5.5, but it's hard to see how you could have a completely >spec compliant implementation in the absence of JSP 2.1 (which

Re: JSF 1.1 vs. JSF 1.2

2007-01-18 Thread Craig McClanahan
On 1/18/07, Reynolds, James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I think I get it now (thanks to help from this list). If I want to use JSF 1.2 with Shale, I must use a J2EE 5 servlet container. However, I may not be able to convince my company to switch from Tomcat 5.5.* If you want to run JSF 1.2 o

Re: JSF 1.1 vs. JSF 1.2

2007-01-18 Thread Greg Reddin
On 1/18/07, Reynolds, James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 2. JSF 1.1, Facelets & Shale This is the platform we are currently developing on. It's "very close" to working with JSF 1.2 from what I can tell (though I have not actually used 1.2 yet). 1. EL unification. Since I'm not using JSPs, t

Re: Startup Error

2007-01-18 Thread Craig McClanahan
On 1/18/07, Gary VanMatre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >From: "Craig McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > On 1/18/07, Greg Reddin wrote: > > > > On 1/18/07, Gary VanMatre wrote: > > > > > > I had not realized that facelets was a subproject of JSF 1.2 > > > . Humm interesting... > > > > > > That

JSF 1.1 vs. JSF 1.2

2007-01-18 Thread Reynolds, James
I think I get it now (thanks to help from this list). If I want to use JSF 1.2 with Shale, I must use a J2EE 5 servlet container. However, I may not be able to convince my company to switch from Tomcat 5.5.* If that is the case, I need to decide between the following two setups: 1. JSF 1.2 & Fa

Re: Startup Error

2007-01-18 Thread Gary VanMatre
>From: "Craig McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > On 1/18/07, Greg Reddin wrote: > > > > On 1/18/07, Gary VanMatre wrote: > > > > > > I had not realized that facelets was a subproject of JSF 1.2 > > > . Humm interesting... > > > > > > That is interesting. I guess it's just a subproject

RE: Startup Error

2007-01-18 Thread Reynolds, James
Using Facelets (on its own) I am able to run JSF 1.2 on Tomcat 5.5.17. I guess the trouble starts when I start to mix in other technologies. I'll need to re-evaluate my setup. -Original Message- From: Gary VanMatre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 12:19 PM To:

SV: Startup Error

2007-01-18 Thread Hermod Opstvedt
Hi Since when did this happen? Until now it's been a regular project. I think someone must have misread/misunderstood Hermod -Opprinnelig melding- Fra: Greg Reddin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: 18. januar 2007 20:30 Til: user@shale.apache.org Emne: Re: Startup Error On 1/18/07, Gary

Re: Startup Error

2007-01-18 Thread Gary VanMatre
>From: "Greg Reddin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > On 1/18/07, Gary VanMatre wrote: > > > > I had not realized that facelets was a subproject of JSF 1.2 > > . Humm interesting... > > > That is interesting. I guess it's just a subproject of the > java.netproject. It's not actually part of the

Re: Startup Error

2007-01-18 Thread Craig McClanahan
On 1/18/07, Greg Reddin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 1/18/07, Gary VanMatre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I had not realized that facelets was a subproject of JSF 1.2 > . Humm interesting... That is interesting. I guess it's just a subproject of the java.netproject. It's not actuall

Re: Startup Error

2007-01-18 Thread Greg Reddin
On 1/18/07, Gary VanMatre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I had not realized that facelets was a subproject of JSF 1.2 . Humm interesting... That is interesting. I guess it's just a subproject of the java.netproject. It's not actually part of the spec is it? Greg

RE: Startup Error

2007-01-18 Thread Gary VanMatre
>From: "Reynolds, James" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Thanks Craig, > > I changed the dialog dtd to the scxml version as you showed me. > However, it's still trying to load the basic dialog. Do I need to > manuall register a copy of this dtd somewhere? > > I'm also getting an error for my faces-c

RE: Startup Error

2007-01-18 Thread Reynolds, James
Thanks Craig, I changed the dialog dtd to the scxml version as you showed me. However, it's still trying to load the basic dialog. Do I need to manuall register a copy of this dtd somewhere? I'm also getting an error for my faces-config.xml dtd (below), which I obtained from a starter Facelets p