From: Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 1/18/07, Greg Reddin wrote:
On 1/18/07, Gary VanMatre wrote:
I had not realized that facelets was a subproject of JSF 1.2
. Humm interesting...
That is interesting. I guess it's just a subproject of the
I think I get it now (thanks to help from this list). If I want to use
JSF 1.2 with Shale, I must use a J2EE 5 servlet container. However, I
may not be able to convince my company to switch from Tomcat 5.5.*
If that is the case, I need to decide between the following two setups:
1. JSF 1.2
On 1/18/07, Reynolds, James [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2. JSF 1.1, Facelets Shale
This is the platform we are currently developing on. It's very close to
working with JSF 1.2 from what I can tell (though I have not actually used
1.2 yet).
1. EL unification. Since I'm not using JSPs, this
On 1/18/07, Reynolds, James [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think I get it now (thanks to help from this list). If I want to use
JSF 1.2 with Shale, I must use a J2EE 5 servlet container. However, I
may not be able to convince my company to switch from Tomcat 5.5.*
If you want to run JSF 1.2 on
If you want to run JSF 1.2 on Tomcat, you really want 6.0 not 5.5. It
might
be technically feasible to hack together a JSF 1.2 implementation that
would
execute on Tomcat 5.5, but it's hard to see how you could have a
completely
spec compliant implementation in the absence of JSP 2.1 (which is
I have a Shale 1.0.3 + Facelets + JSF 1.1 setup running nicely.
However, I observed a disconcerting problem.
I neglected to package a necessary library (buisness code, not framework
code) with my project and then ran the application. Normally, a
bone-headed move like this would be rewarded
From: Kito D. Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I didn't explain myself clearly, I'd prefer to use Shale in
either case.
My problem is that I may be stuck in Tomcat 5.5.17, which
(for me) would necessitate using JSF 1.1.
I need to decide if yesterday's setup is good enough, or if
