Shale + Ajax4jsf

2007-01-31 Thread Reynolds, James
I've been trying to incorporate ajax4jsf into my app. After having troubles, I found some threads on the web indicating that there may be a conflict between the ajax4jsf filter and the Shale filter. Is this the case? Is anyone currently using these two technologies together? My set up is Shale

Duplicate Client-id for ShaleViewRoot

2007-01-29 Thread Reynolds, James
Hello Shale + Facelets bretheren, I'm having a weird issue where facelets is reporting a Client-id : _id0 is duplicated in the faces tree error where ShaleViewRoot is supposedly the source of the duplicate id. It seems to be related with commandLinks on my page. If I remove them, the page loads

RE: Shale + Facelets + Tomahawk [OT?]

2007-01-26 Thread Reynolds, James
and have a great day! On 1/26/07, Reynolds, James [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm having trouble configuring myfaces tomahawk components to work with Facelets and I'm wondering if there is a conflict with Shale. Is anyone else using this combination successfully? I've seen people say they did

JSF 1.1 vs. JSF 1.2

2007-01-18 Thread Reynolds, James
I think I get it now (thanks to help from this list). If I want to use JSF 1.2 with Shale, I must use a J2EE 5 servlet container. However, I may not be able to convince my company to switch from Tomcat 5.5.* If that is the case, I need to decide between the following two setups: 1. JSF 1.2

RE: JSF 1.1 vs. JSF 1.2

2007-01-18 Thread Reynolds, James
If you want to run JSF 1.2 on Tomcat, you really want 6.0 not 5.5. It might be technically feasible to hack together a JSF 1.2 implementation that would execute on Tomcat 5.5, but it's hard to see how you could have a completely spec compliant implementation in the absence of JSP 2.1 (which is

Swallowed Exceptions?

2007-01-18 Thread Reynolds, James
I have a Shale 1.0.3 + Facelets + JSF 1.1 setup running nicely. However, I observed a disconcerting problem. I neglected to package a necessary library (buisness code, not framework code) with my project and then ran the application. Normally, a bone-headed move like this would be rewarded

RE: Getting started...again.

2007-01-16 Thread Reynolds, James
On 1/15/07, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 1/15/07, Reynolds, James [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Steps 0 1 are complete :) I'm much closer as I can see Tomcat behaving as I'd expect, though I did end up with a couple errors in the log: 1. java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError

RE: Getting started...again.

2007-01-16 Thread Reynolds, James
://code.google.com/p/facesgoodies/ -M On 1/15/07, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 1/15/07, Reynolds, James [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Steps 0 1 are complete :) I'm much closer as I can see Tomcat behaving as I'd expect, though I did end up with a couple errors in the log

RE: Getting started...again.

2007-01-16 Thread Reynolds, James
On 1/15/07, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 1/15/07, Reynolds, James [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Steps 0 1 are complete :) I'm much closer as I can see Tomcat behaving as I'd expect, though I did end up with a couple errors in the log: 1. java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError