The registration system at InfoQ is pretty slow; so I downloaded
directly from lulu.com.
Great work Ian, I hope it becomes the 'Thinking in Struts2' and is a
big success.
Hen
On 5/25/07, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is anyone else having trouble logging into the InfoQ site?
On
Not that I've tested at all - but I suspect it works ok.
Hen
On 4/20/07, Crawford, Preston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone know?
Preston
-Original Message-
From: Crawford, Preston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2007 6:39 PM
To: 'Struts Users Mailing List'
Does anybody have any thoughts on whether somebody starting a new
project should use WebWork or Struts 1.x? Any feel for what the
upgrade pain will be from each one to Struts 2.0?
From what I understand, WW is going to be the much simpler upgrade,
but I'm wondering how simple. Also how is the
On 3/27/06, Rick Reumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lighten up. I wrote it. It was supposed to be joke to bring levity to an
incredibly annoying situation. If I wrote actually trying to be you and
truly impersonate you, that would be a different matter. If I wanted to
really spoof being you I
On 3/28/06, Dave Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote:
Not a very impressive joke. This was a major breach of manners 10
years ago, and it still is today.
I thought they were funny 10 years ago, too, especially when it was
deliberately, and obviously, a joke.
I'm a dumb
On 3/28/06, Jonathan Revusky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote:
On 3/28/06, Dave Newton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote:
Not a very impressive joke. This was a major breach of manners 10
years ago, and it still is today.
I thought they were funny 10 years ago
Before I sit and churn through compiling and testing, does anyone know
of any blatant reasons why the Struts 1.2.x release couldn't be using
the latest FileUpload and Validator with all the bugfixes?
(is there a convention for the [xx] part of the subject when talking
about 1.2.x?)
Hen
I've always thought I had a Gandhi complex, not a God one.
*Sits in the road and hums until people are nice to each other and
other such things that only happen in cartoons for 5 year olds - like
talking goldfish*
Hen
On 3/28/06, Dakota Jack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you for this decision
On 3/23/06, Emmanouil Batsis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
As a mortal user i would suggest that all this discussion to be taken
somewhere else, but i have a strong feeling that the motives behind this
and many other thread posts during the last few months are actually fed
by the
On 3/19/06, Dakota Jack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have expressed my technical concerns more than once. I have even had
Craig agree with them, in a sense. JSF is built for those who are
technically challenged and for tools. I don't think even Craig thinks that
JSF is superior as a product
On 3/20/06, Frank W. Zammetti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You might be interested in the bylaws I wrote for Java Web Parts:
http://sourceforge.net/docman/?group_id=140728
Most importantly in the context of this discussion is the fact that
ANYONE who contributes AT ALL can vote and HAVE THEIR
On 3/22/06, Dakota Jack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to point out that communities and PMCs in Apache decidedly do
NOT have a one-to-one mapping.
If you dig into them though, they're changing.
Web Services is flattening, XML is federating, I'm being a pain at
Jakarta trying to get us
On 3/22/06, Jonathan Revusky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote:
foo.apache.org maps to a PMC, which maps to a coding community, not to
a codebase.
Henri, I feel I should give you a bit of end-user feedback. I am not
active in any apache.org projects, but, obviously, it happens
On 3/22/06, Dakota Jack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
On 3/22/06, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/23/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Struts is a cool community. The users are actively involved, in terms
of answering and asking; people obviously care about
14 matches
Mail list logo
