On 3/19/06, Dakota Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have expressed my "technical concerns" more than once. I have even had > Craig agree with them, in a sense. JSF is built for those who are > technically challenged and for tools. I don't think even Craig thinks that > JSF is superior as a product for advanced webwork. Who knows anymore, > however. Look under my discussions, many of them,. about page based > controllers and my advocacy of a web-MVC. > > Why don't you say just what the major reason is that you chose Shale, JSF, > MyFaces, or whatever over Tapestry? Do you think we should have Tapestry > under the Struts "umbrella" too.
Thought I'd pipe up on this one. foo.apache.org maps to a PMC, which maps to a coding community, not to a codebase. So: If Shale, Struts 1.x and Struts 2.x are being developed by the same community - then having them under the oversight of the Struts PMC is a good thing. If the community splits in two or three - then the question of their being together is a good one. Tapestry and MyFaces are not developed by the same community, and shouldn't be unless the communities show significant overlap. It's that simple :) Hen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
