We have a simple login form. By the book. For some reason all of a
sudden the validation in validation.xml is no longer getting called.
We
have validate set to true in the action. Everything is still named the
same. Any idea why this would have changed or where to start looking?
Preston
-
investigation.
Not sure off the top of my head.
Shawn D. Garner
-Original Message-----
From: Preston CRAWFORD [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 11:39 AM
To: user@struts.apache.org
Subject: Validation seemingly not getting called any longer
We have a simple login form
Nothing that I can see. What could I log to find out what's going on? It
basically just doesn't get called.
Preston
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/8/2005 10:52 AM >>>
Preston CRAWFORD wrote:
>We have a simple login form. By the book. For some reason all of a
>sudde
ngly not getting called any longer
>I think you need something in the struts config file telling it to use
the
> validation plugin. Try that line of investigation.
> Not sure off the top of my head.
>
> Shawn D. Garner
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Preston CRAWFORD [ma
08, 2005 1:08 PM
Subject: RE: Validation seemingly not getting called any longer
>I think you need something in the struts config file telling it to use
the
> validation plugin. Try that line of investigation.
> Not sure off the top of my head.
>
> Shawn D. Garner
>
> -Origina
3 PM >>>
On 11/8/05, Preston CRAWFORD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have that. Either way the bottom line for me is it flys past
> validation, message or no message. So I need to figure out why that
is
> happening.
What _type_ of Action is LoginSubmitAction and How is it confi
, etc. Are they
recent (as in someone might have modified them before the last webapp
restart) or dated months ago (indicating no recent changes) ?
Regards,
David
-Original Message-
From: Preston CRAWFORD [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 7:05 PM
To: user@struts
elopers for this site?
5. What are the file datestamps/timestamps on teh web.xml,
struts-config.xml, validation.xml, validator-rules.xml, etc. Are they
recent (as in someone might have modified them before the last webapp
restart) or dated months ago (indicating no recent changes) ?
Regards,
David
t link so you'll know what else to watch out for when
using
multiple (or module based) struts-config.xml files.
Regards,
David
-Original Message-
From: Preston CRAWFORD [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 08, 2005 9:27 PM
To: user@struts.apache.org
Subject: RE: Valida
It appears that way. I've been so heads-down doing Struts alone that I
hadn't really noticed this change in direction. I applaud the Struts
team for being nimble and picking a direction while keeping backwards
compatability. My question, though, is how many of you out there are
actually beginning t
Okay, this is a little complex, so hopefully I can describe it well so
as not to confuse anyone.
We have a need for the following. We need a reusable set of actions,
JSPs, etc. that operate in a popup to allow the user to search for a
medical provider. That's easy enough. The catch is this. The r
EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/18/05 1:23 pm >>>
On 11/17/05, Preston CRAWFORD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the UI requirement is that the user perform the
> search and then (as transparent as possible to them) have the page
> refresh the portions of the display that say what medica
Yeah, no easy solution for this. The more I think about it the more it
occurs to me that what we're attempting to do is setup a common code
base for updating any N number of forms using Javascript. The plumbing
for this is easy and obvious (I listed it earlier). But making it a
single code base tha
nt to do is change one value. Or maybe we should
give in and use forms[0].X, etc.
Preston
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/19/2005 11:57:50 AM >>>
Preston CRAWFORD wrote:
> Yeah, no easy solution for this. The more I think about it the more
it
> occurs to me that what we're
Oh boy. It's hard to know which direction to go with all this churn.
Preston
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/28/2005 12:38:25 PM >>>
I found this very interesting this morning:
http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=37794#192216
and this as well
http://www.javalobby.org/java/forums/t55
And this is about where I start ramping up my Ruby studying.
I mean, I'm all for competing frameworks, but when the Struts umbrella
covers 3 different frameworks (which in term utilize how many
technologies?) it begins to get a little silly. Which one should I be
learning/using? I know, whichever
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12/1/2005 7:30:16 PM >>>
My personal belief is that component oriented development is more
accessible
to a wider array of developers than action oriented frameworks.
Therefore,
I spend my time (disclaimer: I'm paid to do this too, but that
doesn't
cover much of my open sourc
You may not be marketing anything, Ted. But those of us out in the field
that work with the decision makers and who help in the decision making
have to think about these things. It's the reality of living and
developing in a world where there are so many options.
Preston
-
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12/3/2005 6:06:27 AM >>>
On 12/2/05, Preston CRAWFORD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You may not be marketing anything, Ted. But those of us out in the
field
> that work with the decision makers and who help in the decision
making
> have to t
. It would be better if
Shale were it's own project, not tied to the Struts name and Struts core
was allowed to ride off into the Sunset. This would be less confusing to
the business decision maker, I believe.
Preston
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12/5/2005 2:16:17 PM >>>
On 12/5/
I can see the roof analogy. I just thought, branding wise, it was
confusing. You already have one layer with it being an Apache project.
So really Shale is Apache Struts Shale (formerly a Jakarta project that
still uses lots of Jakarta components). :-)
I don't know. I think the way things are head
Exactly.
Or back to my example. Apache Jakarta Struts Shale.
Preston
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12/5/2005 3:12:00 PM >>>
>>Hm. Is it untidy that the Apache Software foundation has at least
three web application
frameworks? Should they be untethered from the Apache name and allowed
to ride off... ? Fo
I'm starting to begin looking at JSF in part because of what I've read
here on the Struts mailing list. i.e. Struts is embracing JSF, many
developers see it as inevitable. I have some experience with Tapestry and
Ruby on Rails so I'm excited about component frameworks. However, what I
don't know, h
> I don't know what the future will hold. JSF may win the day on nothing
> but marketing alone. It has the force of being a "standard", and while
> not all standards ultimately succeed, it certainly is a leg up on other
I would argue that with Java (J2EE specifically) "standards" have largely
ju
On Tue, 13 Dec 2005, Dakota Jack wrote:
Preston, none of those examples are J2EE. They can be used with J2EE but
they have nothing to do with anything beyond J2SE.
Toolkit.
As in the tools one uses to build J2EE apps. Pedantic much...
Preston
---
On Tue, 13 Dec 2005, Dakota Jack wrote:
And, Josh, last time I looked JSP was not on the list we are talking about.
So, what was your point?
The point is you're being pedantic. I wasn't describing the entirety of
J2EE or even the implementation. Rather the tools, frameworks, etc. used
to bui
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005, Josh McDonald wrote:
Mainly I thought I'd interrupt the ranting :)
And what's tomcat if it's not an implementation of JSP / Servlets, and
hence a partial implementation of J2EE?
Just ignore him. He doesn't care to be helpful. Just wants to hear himself
speak.
Preston
On Wed, 2005-12-14 at 08:18 -0800, Dakota Jack wrote:
> Look, Preston, if you want your own language with your own meanings, that is
I'm not creating my own language. You're being pedantic.
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=toolkit
Main Entry: toolkit
Part of Speech: noun
Definition:
> > "His comrades fought beside him, Van Owen and the rest...
> > >But of all the thompson gunners- Roland was the best."
> > >
> > > Josh McDonald
> > > Analyst Programmer
> > > Information Technology
> > > Ph: 61 7 3006
On Wed, 2005-12-14 at 08:37 -0800, Dakota Jack wrote:
> This is not a "koffee klatch" where the girls can say whatever they like.
> This is a professional forum and presumably it is okay to ask the
> participants to make sense without being pedantic.
What did I say that didn't make sense? That I i
On Wed, 2005-12-14 at 08:47 -0800, Dakota Jack wrote:
> You originally said that your list was the virtual core of J2EE. That's
No. I never said "virtual core".
> what you said. You call someone a pedant when you want to demean something
> they taught you. Anyway, for your "pedantic" purposes:
On Wed, 2005-12-14 at 08:47 -0800, Dakota Jack wrote:
> You originally said that your list was the virtual core of J2EE. That's
> what you said. You call someone a pedant when you want to demean something
> they taught you. Anyway, for your "pedantic" purposes:
Also, after you inevitably reply
Ha!! :-)
> Wow! that J2EE definition just rocked! I was so impressed that I looked
> it up ... it comes from here:
> http://www.answers.com/topic/j2ee
> Cool hey?!
> I guess I'll be looking up that resource for ad-hoc tech definitions too.
>
> Dakota Jack wrote:
>
>> Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 08:47
Sorry about the noise there. I thought that was just sent to me and not
the list, so I accidentally replied to the list when I didn't mean to.
Preston
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12/14/2005 3:34:26 PM >>>
Ha!! :-)
-
To unsubscribe,
> I have never had a concern about the "umbrella" idea, which is the latest
> description of what is happening. I would in fact encourage that and
> cannot
> see any problem with it. However, I pay more attention to people's feet
> than their lips. "Is Shale the Next Struts?" is the feet. The c
; Let me say do say in your favor, Sean, that you certainly used to show
> huge
> restraint of pen and tongue, since you did not comment on the Struts lists
> for three years after your recently disclosed active involvement.
>
> On 12/16/05, Preston Crawford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w
We have a problem. We're working on an application and we have some
forms in session scope. The strange thing is if someone changes state on
their form, users on other computers on other browsers hitting the same
exact page see the state change that was made to the form on another
computer. I have
t.
So for example...
Preston
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 9/30/2005 6:19:26 PM >>>
On 10/1/05, Preston CRAWFORD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> We have a problem. We're working on an application and we have some
> forms in session scope. The stra
then the shared state
isn't in
the ActionForm. It's probably a problem with instance variables in
your
Actions.
On 9/30/05, Preston CRAWFORD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> We have a problem. We're working on an application and we have some
> forms in session scope. The
No. What information would be useful and relevant? Struts-config? The
form bean itself? The action, the JSP? I didn't want to overload the
list, obviously.
Preston
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/3/2005 9:40:37 AM >>>
Preston CRAWFORD wrote:
>Don't really have any in
I'm trying to setup global exception handling. I have web.xml sending
404 and 500 exceptions to /error.do. In that action I should be able to
get at the exception, shouldn't I? Or do I have to do that earlier in
the process? I simply want to get at the exception and log it.
Preston
--
ROTECTED] 10/3/2005 2:33:16 PM >>>
Preston CRAWFORD on 03/10/05 21:47, wrote:
> I'm trying to setup global exception handling. I have web.xml
sending
> 404 and 500 exceptions to /error.do. In that action I should be able
to
> get at the exception, shouldn't I? Or do I hav
le.
Frank
Adam Hardy wrote:
> Preston CRAWFORD on 03/10/05 21:47, wrote:
>
>> I'm trying to setup global exception handling. I have web.xml
sending
>> 404 and 500 exceptions to /error.do. In that action I should be able
to
>> get at the exception, shouldn't I? Or do I have
t;>
Yes you could do that, or you could try
404
/error404.do
500
/error500.do
and map them to the same action class with a useful parameter for
mapping.getParameter() - perhaps slightly less coding.
Preston CRAWFORD on 03/10/
xt that appears in the browser is purely browser-dependent.
So basically a real live java exception would tell you no more than you
already know, except perhaps if there is one, a stacktrace from the
guts
of your appserver.
Preston CRAWFORD on 03/10/05 23:57, wrote:
> Right, but even at this point
This actually does get me some of the information. Unfortunately since
I'm sticking another servlet (my action) in between, the exception acts
like it's coming from my action. So it appears I may have to go the
route of extending the ExceptionHandler. I was hoping there was a way to
avoid that, but
Tomcat 5.0.28.
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/4/2005 3:34:31 AM >>>
What's your container? I saw this behaviour on older resin
implementations, it was obviously a bug, that in some sequence of
requsts the session got mixed, B got A's session, but only for one
request, after that it had it's own session.
session as well (as in I'll logout, shut down the browser,
open up the browser and there it is again). So this has me wondering if
it's related to hibernate, which we are using to populate this object.
Preston
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/4/2005 3:31:29 AM >>>
On 10/4/05,
ged out, logged in and it behaved as expected. It wasn't there.
Preston
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/4/2005 8:29:57 AM >>>
On 10/4/05, Preston CRAWFORD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tomcat 5.0.28.
this should work. However try logging out the sessionIds and compare
them t
ect
with hard coded data and put that in session.
- I don't know how do you populate the objects, if it's a complicated
process
try to take out some of the functionality temporary until you get to
the
point
when it does work.
Tamas
On 10/4/05, Preston CRAWFORD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&
th a stack trace.
Preston
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/5/2005 3:34:04 PM >>>
Preston CRAWFORD wrote:
>This actually does get me some of the information. Unfortunately
since
>I'm sticking another servlet (my action) in between, the exception
acts
>like it's coming
alidate() when the user logs off?
Regards,
Gareth
Preston CRAWFORD wrote:
> This is why I haven't sent code. Because I am narrowing it down already.
> Same behaviour on WebSphere as of yesterday. Behaviour isn't exhibited
> when the object in question isn't created as a r
Once again a question about best practices. So I setup an error page,
referenced in struts-config.xml that shows the error. My problem is
this.
#1 - I want to log the error and print out to the console in addition
to going to the error page. This isn't happening. Does this mean that I
need to ove
I've done this in the past. Used modules to logically (and for the sake
of having sane config files) break up these config files. However I'm
wondering if anyone avoids using modules and maybe merges the files
using ANT or something? Reason I ask is because I know there are
pitfalls to using module
-
Frank W. Zammetti
Founder and Chief Software Architect
Omnytex Technologies
http://www.omnytex.com
AIM: fzammetti
Yahoo: fzammetti
MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, October 11, 2005 4:36 pm, Preston CRAWFORD said:
> I've done this in the past. Used modules to logically (and for the
sake
>
ftware Architect
Omnytex Technologies
http://www.omnytex.com
AIM: fzammetti
Yahoo: fzammetti
MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, October 11, 2005 4:36 pm, Preston CRAWFORD said:
> I've done this in the past. Used modules to logically (and for the
sake
> of having sane config files) break up
Oooh. I like that. That works relatively well so far, although it's not
picking up on my secondary tiles-defs.xml file.
Preston
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/11/2005 2:26:22 PM >>>
From: "Preston CRAWFORD" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I've done this in the pa
I don't know why (I've been doing struts development for years, but I
guess we've always been very explicit in our struts-config files), but
only recently did I discover that this was the default behavior for form
beans. And I'm trying to figure out, mostly on a higher level, on a
theoretical level
size in
Struts. The similer technology will be included into next version of
Struts Dialogs.
Michael.
On 10/26/05, Preston CRAWFORD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't know why (I've been doing struts development for years, but
I
> guess we've always been very explici
59 matches
Mail list logo
