Try changing the form method to get. I think post does not sends the
data in the way you have done.
Just my guess..
Anil.
-Original Message-
From: temp temp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2006 8:13 PM
To: user@struts.apache.org
Subject: html form
I have a h
In short, no. You should create hidden fields for each of the params
you want to pass.
On 11/22/06, temp temp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have a html form
Display OptionsShow 10
Show 20
Show 50
Show 100
Show 200
When I receive request posted
From: Puneet Lakhina [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On 10/11/06, Ed Griebel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You should not instantiate manually your own formbean nor put it
into
> > the request scope, you must use the formbean passed into your action
> > class via the ActionForm object.
> Ok I think my
On 10/11/06, Ed Griebel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You should not instantiate manually your own formbean nor put it into
the request scope, you must use the formbean passed into your action
class via the ActionForm object.
Ok I think my question isnt clear.
I have two action classes PrepareA
From: Puneet Lakhina [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> The prepare action needs to prepopulate values into the form that is
> displayed subsequently. How else can i do this??
Populating a form is different than instantiating one and putting it in
to scope: Struts1 already instantiates and scopes forms.
You should not instantiate manually your own formbean nor put it into
the request scope, you must use the formbean passed into your action
class via the ActionForm object.
When you get the handle to the formbean you can either cast the
formbean to it's real class or you can use
BeanUtils.populate
On 10/11/06, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: Puneet Lakhina [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> the fooAction has formBeanName as its form bean defined in the struts
> config. But Im not able to get any values into the fields in my form.
Why are you doing this manually? If you have configu
From: Puneet Lakhina [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> the fooAction has formBeanName as its form bean defined in the struts
> config. But Im not able to get any values into the fields in my form.
Why are you doing this manually? If you have configured your actions
properly the framework will do this bi
If there is a different rule on advocating Shale-Struts as Struts.next
for Craig, that is understandable.
But where in his post did he say that Shale-Struts was Struts.next? All
he said was that the way the rest of the world is going (and imho HAS
been going) with a variety of view techniques
On 4/12/05, Dakota Jack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> BINGO -- There is a rule on revolutionary developements in ASF which
> is pretty much abridged by this comment, Craig, and made worse by your
> repeating it. If you are doing revolutionary development, the ASF
> rule is, as I understand it, that
BINGO -- There is a rule on revolutionary developements in ASF which
is pretty much abridged by this comment, Craig, and made worse by your
repeating it. If you are doing revolutionary development, the ASF
rule is, as I understand it, that you don't pretend to have superceded
the present until aft
Craig McClanahan wrote:
On Apr 12, 2005 2:27 PM, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"I would caution new projects, however, to *not* use the Struts HTML
tags. That part of Struts has received fairly little developer
attention, and should be considered legacy at this point."
This quo
On Apr 12, 2005 2:27 PM, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >"I would caution new projects, however, to *not* use the Struts HTML
> >tags. That part of Struts has received fairly little developer
> >attention, and should be considered legacy at this point."
>
> This quote has no attributi
"I would caution new projects, however, to *not* use the Struts HTML
tags. That part of Struts has received fairly little developer
attention, and should be considered legacy at this point."
This quote has no attribution, but as a committer, I would disagree
with this assertion. There are certai
Dakota Jack wrote:
This was not your mistake, Dave.
Unfortunately, there is a source to that false rumor. Some of those
so sanguine about the conduct of some members and the Struts community
might want to consider how this happened and to make sure it does not
continue.
Maybe we should start
This was not your mistake, Dave.
Unfortunately, there is a source to that false rumor. Some of those
so sanguine about the conduct of some members and the Struts community
might want to consider how this happened and to make sure it does not
continue.
It is important that the rumor, like other
> Its not true that the HTML tags are receiving no developer
> attention.
Ok, my mistake. Thanks for clearing that up.
- Dave
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Its not true that the HTML tags are receiving no developer attention. Since
Version 1.2.4 was released the following changes have been made to the HTML
taglib:
1) Highlighting Error Fields
http://www.niallp.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/strutshighlight.html
2) ErrorTag now has header, footer, prefix and s
> I recall reading something about the HTML tags not receiving
> any developer attention and new project are encouraged not to
> use them. My question is what is the alternative to them?
> JSTL? Is there a guide or wiki page regarding the issues of
> migrating from the HTML tags to whatever
19 matches
Mail list logo
