]
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 2:16 PM
To: Struts Users Mailing List
Subject: RE: Please reply to the mailing list, not to the person
I'm pretty sure it's Mrs/Ms Smoak since Wendy is usually a female name
(please correct me if I'm wrong Wendy) :)
-Abdullah
On 6/8/05, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> How about... top posting and NOT trimming the previous post? ;)
>
I'm not sure I've encountered an email app where top posting was not
the default. It'll probably be hard to convert entire populations to
put their replies at the bottom if th
David G. Friedman wrote:
Wendy is my sister's name. If you're expecting her to be a he and not a she,
think again. :)
I thought something was strange about him.
Dave
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additi
eo/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 12:57 PM
To: user@struts.apache.org
Subject: Re: Please reply to the mailing list, not to the person
Agreed to everything, but perhaps we can think more about what Mr. Smoak
said "get more personal replies", personal replies are good because you
:57 PM
To: user@struts.apache.org
Subject: Re: Please reply to the mailing list, not to the person
Agreed to everything, but perhaps we can think more about what Mr. Smoak
said "get more personal replies", personal replies are good because you
can see in your mailbox that there is a reply especially
Agreed to everything, but perhaps we can think more about what Mr. Smoak
said "get more personal replies", personal replies are good because you
can see in your mailbox that there is a reply especially to you and that
would be good you read that (it's only my opinion and I even do that), but
we
hehe, i see your point. but i'm generally neutral on the top posting
issue.
it's nice because everything can be found in one post, esp. if you
haven't been following and just jumped in to the latest post.
but if you have been following the thread, then it's unnecessary.
some threads take on a l
woodchuck wrote:
> while we're on the subject of mailing list rules/etiquette/pet peeves:
How about... top posting and NOT trimming the previous post? ;)
At least trim your posts. Please, do it for the archives if nothing else.
There are so many posts that have the previous two, three, and more
while we're on the subject of mailing list rules/etiquette/pet peeves:
i despise ppl who purposely post messages that are future dated so they
remain at the top of your inbox messages list.
this is the worst offense imho. i promptly delete these without
hesitation.
woodchuck
--- Michael Joura
On 6/8/05, Hubert Rabago <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In a matter of a few minutes, I suddenly got three offline messages
> with follow up questions. I usually don't mind, though each time I
> reply to such messages, I include the text below. In this case, I
> thought I'd share these thoughts wit
Yes, that happens with gmail users. Usually though, the first reply
shows *both* struts list and the gmail address, and if I reply to that
and they reply back, then it's just the gmail address. With the three
I refer to, they all just went to me.
If you three are reading this, btw, I'm still fin
Wendy Smoak wrote:
Hubert, when I reply to one of your messages, the 'To:' line comes up with
both the Struts list _and_ you personally. It happens (to me) with several
people on the list, but not everyone. I don't know if it's something on my
end, or something in the messages you're sending,
From: "Hubert Rabago" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> In a matter of a few minutes, I suddenly got three offline messages
> with follow up questions. I usually don't mind, though each time I
> reply to such messages, I include the text below. In this case, I
> thought I'd share these thoughts with the rest
Minor additions
:
Hubert Rabago wrote:
1) People on the list help each other out voluntarily.
So thank the people that help you, even if they help you off-line.
If they help you a LOT, thank them even more, especially for off-topic
or RTFM/STFW answers, even MORE especially if you ask a lot
14 matches
Mail list logo
