in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Validation-and-conversion-conflict---best-method--tp26341189p26545367.html
Sent from the Struts - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr
-and-conversion-conflict---best-method--tp26341189p26545367.html
Sent from the Struts - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-h
field-validator type=conversion short-circuit=true
message Try another format /message
/field-validator
/field
Thanks in advance, if you have a chance to respond.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Validation-and-conversion-conflict---best-method--tp26341189p26545367
://old.nabble.com/Validation-and-conversion-conflict---best-method--tp26341189p26341189.html
Sent from the Struts - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
For additional
can't be the first to struggle with this, so I'd be interested in
hearing how some of you have solved this in the past - is there a clean
and elegant solution?
Thanks in advance!
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Validation-and-conversion-conflict---best-method
with the actual object.
I can't be the first to struggle with this, so I'd be interested in hearing
how some of you have solved this in the past - is there a clean and elegant
solution?
Thanks in advance!
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Validation-and-conversion-conflict---best
).
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Validation-and-conversion-conflict---best-method--tp26341189p26345292.html
Sent from the Struts - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user
7 matches
Mail list logo
