Apparently, in weblogic (which is the server we are currently using)
it is possible to "hardcode" the context-root into the weblogic.xml
file (if not specified in the EAR application.xml file). All the
sysadmin needs to do is let the request come through "unscathed" and
we can at least remain unde
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You may combine mod_rewrite and mod_proxy in Apache and do all kinds of
wunderful and
strange URL mangling things:
That's all well and good, so long (AFAIK) as the original client's
request is maintained when the servlet is called. Otherwise, as a
servlet developer, I ha
You may combine mod_rewrite and mod_proxy in Apache and do all kinds of
wunderful and
strange URL mangling things:
E.g. for all URLs ending in .jsp stripping the /apps/ in the path
or for all *.jpg, *.gif, *.html beginning with /modulename/ addinf /apps/
before
or even generate http subrequests t
On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 15:30:12 -0500, David Durham
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Craig McClanahan wrote:
>
> > ...
> > URI seen by the application properly reflects the one that the client
> > sent, not the one that was internally passed from the proxy.
>
>
> What about a scenario where the proxy e
Craig McClanahan wrote:
...
URI seen by the application properly reflects the one that the client
sent, not the one that was internally passed from the proxy.
What about a scenario where the proxy ends up mangling such details as
the protocol. Specifically, Oracle 9ias' proxy has a nasty habit o
> See Section SRV.4.4 of the Servlet Spec. In brief, and modulo URL
> encoding differences, the following equation is required to be true:
>
> requestURI = contextPath + servletPath + pathInfo
Thanks Craig! That definitely saved me time. I have full confidence
that with this information I wi
> -Original Message-
> From: Craig McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2004 1:19 PM
> To: Struts Users Mailing List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: configuration violating J2EE spec?
>
>
> On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 15:13:53 -04
On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 15:13:53 -0400, Dan Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Before I go paging through the J2EE spec to find a defense, I want to
> see if someone out there can offer advice in the following matter. In
> our application, the configuration of the servers is such that any URL
> with a
> -Original Message-
> From: Dan Allen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2004 1:09 PM
> To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subject: Re: configuration violating J2EE spec?
>
>
> > Web server (ie apache) or application server (ie tomca
> Web server (ie apache) or application server (ie tomcat). Application server
> shouldn't be
> stripping off the context, and yes that would be a violation. Web server stripping
> off
> context... well if you tell it. Our webserver doesn't strip off context at all,
> because we tell it
> no
> -Original Message-
> From: Dan Allen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2004 12:14 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: configuration violating J2EE spec?
>
>
> Before I go paging through the J2EE spec to find a defense, I want to
> s
Before I go paging through the J2EE spec to find a defense, I want to
see if someone out there can offer advice in the following matter. In
our application, the configuration of the servers is such that any URL
with a context of "/apps/" is captured by the webserver, the URL is
rewritten with this
12 matches
Mail list logo
