test
Hi
Thank you for your help,
I lookup for a scenario like request hive or any other scenario to improve
that the observer is called and used, because i am testing this in a small
cluster not in prod, so i need to initiate a test.
Regards
Rabii
--
Sent from: http://zookeeper-user.578899.n2
. It should say 'observer'.
On 10/26/18, 7:21 AM, "lamriq" wrote:
Hello
I add a new server Zookeeper as observer, but I am not sure if it's work
well or not, how can I test if the observer send OBSERVERINFO and don't
vote.
Regards
Rabii
--
Sent
Hi, look at that server’s log - it should say that it is observing.
On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 5:21 AM lamriq wrote:
> Hello
>
> I add a new server Zookeeper as observer, but I am not sure if it's work
> well or not, how can I test if the observer send OBSERVERINFO and don't
> vo
Hello
I add a new server Zookeeper as observer, but I am not sure if it's work
well or not, how can I test if the observer send OBSERVERINFO and don't
vote.
Regards
Rabii
--
Sent from: http://zookeeper-user.578899.n2.nabble.com/
Hi Alexander,
I was having problem with running the ant from command line, but As soon as
I set up the environment variable, I am making progress. I'll inform you
what happen with me during the test. I will post any issue that I face
during running the test steps, in order to be useful for anyone
. Also I am
ussing Asunc mode.
Can anyone share knowledge?
Cheers,
Ibrahim
--
View this message in context:
http://zookeeper-user.578899.n2.nabble.com/Best-strategy-to-test-Zookeeper-tp7580580p7580592.html
Sent from the zookeeper-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
was for only one client
machine, but in this scenario I have multiple client machines. Also I am
ussing Asunc mode.
Can anyone share knowledge?
Cheers,
Ibrahim
--
View this message in context:
http://zookeeper-user.578899.n2.nabble.com/Best-strategy-to-test-Zookeeper-tp7580580p7580592.html
/Best-strategy-to-test-Zookeeper-tp7580580.html
Sent from the zookeeper-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
there is a system test in ZK that allows measuring latency and throughput.
more details here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2023
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 8:14 PM, Ibrahim i.s.el-san...@newcastle.ac.uk
wrote:
Hi folks
I am benchmarking the performance of Zookeeper using five
Hello Ibrahim,
what I would do: as the order of request execution within one session
is guaranteed, just create one special znode after your real test has
been done. Then set up a watcher for this special node to get notified
when Zookeeper has finished processing all requests. This way, you
...@gmail.com wrote:
there is a system test in ZK that allows measuring latency and throughput.
more details here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2023
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 8:14 PM, Ibrahim i.s.el-san...@newcastle.ac.uk
wrote:
Hi folks
I am benchmarking the performance
end time.
Can you give me hint with this?
Thanks alot
Ibrahim
--
View this message in context:
http://zookeeper-user.578899.n2.nabble.com/Best-strategy-to-test-Zookeeper-tp7580580p7580584.html
Sent from the zookeeper-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
/status as the last request after having performed all
tests. /tests/status may be set to, e.g., completed or a timestamp
indicating the time when that request was sent. This is the second
process creating the test scenario.
What will now happen is the following:
- The Watcher process will sit
looks like you didn't run the first step in the parent directory ? ant jar
compile-test
The patch is not relevant for 3.4.6, the systest should run without it,
although the
first steps are the same. Take a look at src/java/systest/README.txt
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 9:40 PM, Ibrahim i.s.el-san
of the work has been done. This can
be accomplished by a special, additional request to set the value of a
znode, e.g., /tests/status to a certain value. What you should do now is
(preferably in a separate process that gets its own ZooKeeper session):
- Just before you start the submission of the test
OK...I think I answered my own question.
For some reason the docs have a backslash in the command which was messing
it up.
So...remove the backslash and put the version number on the jar and all is
good.
.nabble.com/Unable-to-run-the-SyncPrimitive-test-program-tp7577787.html
Sent from the zookeeper-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi Ivan,
[grussell@centos ~]$ cat /etc/hosts
127.0.0.1 localhost.localdomain localhost
::1 centos localhost6.localdomain6 localhost6
[grussell@centos ~]$ hostname
centos
Thank you,
Gabriel
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 7:20 AM, Ivan Kelly iv...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Gabriel,
Could
Ah, it's as I thought. The code for generating the identifier for a
bookie, uses InetAddress.getLocalHost().getHostAddress(), which in
this case will get centos and resolve it to ::1
Could you try enabling ipv6 again and testing with the patch on
else listening on 2181 on that machine?
What environment are you using? OS etc.
-Ivan
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 01:23:10AM -0400, gabriel russell wrote:
I've posted here:
http://wiccatech.com/mvn-test-output.txt
the output of me running
mvn test -Dsurefire.useFile=false
It's
Is there any non-loopback interface at all on the vm?
-Ivan
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 10:09:57AM -0400, gabriel russell wrote:
Basically nothing. I'm currently just working on a single machine trying to
get tests running. After I can get the tests running I'll start setting up
a cluster on a
Yes, two.
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Ivan Kelly iv...@apache.org wrote:
Is there any non-loopback interface at all on the vm?
-Ivan
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 10:09:57AM -0400, gabriel russell wrote:
Basically nothing. I'm currently just working on a single machine trying
to
get
Yes. And while my interfaces have both ipv6 and ipv4 addresses, the ipv6
addresses are not actually usable ( with the exception of ::1/128 on the
loopback )
- Gabreil
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Ivan Kelly iv...@apache.org wrote:
Thats why I asked about the net.ipv6.bindv6only value.
Bookies are binding on ::1/128, which the client doesn't like.
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.hadoop.hbase.user/26518
mentions a similar issue.
We'll have to look into how to fix this without requiring full ipv6
disablement. Did you install you're on centos VM, or download an image
Hello,
I am running ant test to zookeeper-3.4.2. And found NioNettySuiteHammerTest
failed sometime. The failure seems is caused by connection refused. My question
is:
1. why this UT is failed?
2. why this UT just failed sometime?
Thank you.
Hello,
I am trying to run unit test for zookeeper-3.4.2. I assume you have run ant
test for this version zookeeper.
Could you please tell me the environment for running zookeeper-3.4.2 UT?
My steps is: run ant test after decompression zookeeper-3.4.2.tar.gz package.
And here is my environment
...@163.com wrote:
Hello,
I am running ant test to zookeeper-3.4.2 and failed with the following
informantion:
Could you please help to check what the problem is? Thank you.
[exec] then mv -f .deps/zktest_st-TestDriver.Tpo
.deps/zktest_st-TestDriver.Po; else rm -f .deps/zktest_st
Yes, you are right. After install cppunit. ant test succeed. Thank you so
much~
At 2012-01-05 01:11:25,Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote:
Seems you don't have cppunit installed? This is what I have on my machine:
libcppunit-1.12-1 install
libcppunit-dev
29 matches
Mail list logo
