[uml-devel] [PATCH 08/44] kernel: Move pm_power_off to common code

2014-10-07 Thread Guenter Roeck
pm_power_off is defined for all architectures. Move it to common code. Have all architectures call do_kernel_poweroff instead of pm_power_off. Some architectures point pm_power_off to machine_power_off. For those, call do_kernel_poweroff from machine_power_off instead. Cc: Richard Henderson Cc:

Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 08/44] kernel: Move pm_power_off to common code

2014-10-07 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 7:28 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote: > pm_power_off is defined for all architectures. Move it to common code. > > Have all architectures call do_kernel_poweroff instead of pm_power_off. > Some architectures point pm_power_off to machine_power_off. For those, > call do_kernel_powero

Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 08/44] kernel: Move pm_power_off to common code

2014-10-07 Thread Richard Weinberger
Am 07.10.2014 07:28, schrieb Guenter Roeck: > arch/um/kernel/reboot.c| 2 -- Acked-by: Richard Weinberger Thanks, //richard -- Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer Achieve PCI DSS

Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 08/44] kernel: Move pm_power_off to common code

2014-10-08 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday, October 06, 2014 10:28:10 PM Guenter Roeck wrote: > pm_power_off is defined for all architectures. Move it to common code. > > Have all architectures call do_kernel_poweroff instead of pm_power_off. > Some architectures point pm_power_off to machine_power_off. For those, > call do_kerne

Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 08/44] kernel: Move pm_power_off to common code

2014-10-08 Thread Jesper Nilsson
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 07:28:10AM +0200, Guenter Roeck wrote: > pm_power_off is defined for all architectures. Move it to common code. > > Have all architectures call do_kernel_poweroff instead of pm_power_off. > Some architectures point pm_power_off to machine_power_off. For those, > call do_ker

Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 08/44] kernel: Move pm_power_off to common code

2014-10-09 Thread Vineet Gupta
On Tuesday 07 October 2014 11:01 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote: diff --git a/arch/arc/kernel/reset.c b/arch/arc/kernel/reset.c index 2768fa1..8a4fc47 100644 --- a/arch/arc/kernel/reset.c +++ b/arch/arc/kernel/reset.c @@ -26,9 +26,6 @@ void machine_restart(char *__unused) void machine_power_off(void)

Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 08/44] kernel: Move pm_power_off to common code

2014-10-09 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > @@ -184,6 +179,8 @@ machine_halt(void) > void > machine_power_off(void) > { > + do_kernel_poweroff(); > + poweroff -> power_off for consistency. > index c4f50a3..1da27d1 100644 > --- a/arch/blackfin/kernel/reboot.c > +++ b/arch/blackfin/kernel/reboot.c > @@ -106,6 +107,7 @@ void ma

Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 08/44] kernel: Move pm_power_off to common code

2014-10-09 Thread Catalin Marinas
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 06:28:10AM +0100, Guenter Roeck wrote: > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c > index e0ef8ba..db396bb 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c > @@ -94,8 +94,6 @@ void soft_restart(unsigned long addr) >

Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 08/44] kernel: Move pm_power_off to common code

2014-10-09 Thread Guenter Roeck
On 10/09/2014 03:38 AM, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > >> @@ -184,6 +179,8 @@ machine_halt(void) >> void >> machine_power_off(void) >> { >> +do_kernel_poweroff(); >> + > > poweroff -> power_off for consistency. > Dunno; matter of personal preference. I started with that, but ultimately went

Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 08/44] kernel: Move pm_power_off to common code

2014-10-10 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > >>@@ -184,6 +179,8 @@ machine_halt(void) > >> void > >> machine_power_off(void) > >> { > >>+ do_kernel_poweroff(); > >>+ > > > >poweroff -> power_off for consistency. > > > Dunno; matter of personal preference. I started with that, but ultimately went > with poweroff to distinguish powe

Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 08/44] kernel: Move pm_power_off to common code

2014-10-10 Thread Guenter Roeck
On 10/09/2014 01:24 PM, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > @@ -184,6 +179,8 @@ machine_halt(void) void machine_power_off(void) { + do_kernel_poweroff(); + >>> >>> poweroff -> power_off for consistency. >>> >> Dunno; matter of personal preference. I started with that, b