[uml-user] kernel 2.6.13.3 + uml-2.6.13-bs3

2005-10-07 Thread Nosorozec
(and also for 2.6.13.1 and 2.6.13.2) kernel. So my question is: is it any rule that bs-patches should be use only with main kernels (2.6.X)?, or it simply depends ... Rgds, Nosorozec --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Power Architecture

Re: [uml-user] TLS libc and UML/Slackware 10.2

2005-10-07 Thread Nosorozec
Blaisorblade wrote: Have you found a ready-made filesystem? In that case, I'd like to test it. I made this filesystem by myself. I simply installed needed packages from slackware distribution (10.2) in some directory (perl script for that job is attached. slackware files can be downloaded

[uml-user] TLS libc and UML/Slackware 10.2

2005-10-02 Thread Nosorozec
Hello, some time ago there were posts here that using TLS is almost imposible under UML. Lately I tried Slackware 10.2 (native support for TLS) as a guest filesystem and it works without any problems. +-- Under UML --+ /root# uname -a Linux darkstar 2.6.13.2-bs2 #1 Sun Oct 2 11:38:07

Re: [uml-user] Compiling UML on 2.6.13.1

2005-09-11 Thread Nosorozec
Hi, on my system: slackware-current, # uname -a Linux rataxas 2.6.13.1-skas3-v9-pre7 #1 Sun Sep 11 16:43:07 CEST 2005 i686 unknown unknown GNU/Linux 2.6.13.1 as guest runs and compile OK. # make defconfig ARCH=um # make menuconfig ARCH=um (disable only loadable module support) # make ARCH=um