Hi Peter,
This means there is a known issue with very high volume Queues/
durable subscribers in 4.x that is being addressed in the next release.
I wouldn't recommend you go with the next release in production
however, not all the functionality is tied down yet.
You could either help contri
Thanks Nate -
Thats exactly what I am trying to do now :( .
Lalit Nagpal
CSA, SunGard
nmittler wrote:
>
> Unfortunately the CMS and JMS APIs do not provide this capability
> directly.
> What you could do is make it a string property and encode something at the
> beginning (e.g. "int:123"
You might also want to take a look at the JmsLogAppender or
JndiJmsLogAppender
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/activemq/trunk/activemq-optional/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/util/JmsLogAppender.java?view=markup
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/activemq/trunk/activemq-optional/src/main/java/org/apac
can somebody confirm if this is really a bug? if it is, it looks like a
pretty serious one.
elliottjf wrote:
>
> Okay, from what I can tell, when using the ra activation spec driven
> consumer construction, the ConsumerInfo options where getting lost.
>
> Upon removing the errant 'this.' and
I started playing around with Message Groups and have a bunch of new
questions:
1. If I'm understanding this correctly, Message Groups are tying groupIDs
to a specific consumer of the Queue. However, this mapping is private to
the broker. So, the problem I'm seeing is that if I run 2 brokers,
The reason that the dispatch needs to be paused on the Server side is for a
Quality of Service Broker to control the message dispatch if the network
traffic gets to be too much. This is similar to the client Pre-Fetch Limit,
except the messages are measured and controlled on servicer hosting the
Thanks for the information. As per the JMS documentation , Sessions with
durable subscriptions, should specify a Client Identifier
I am using Java 1.5 and Tomcat 5.5.20 .
Where should I specify the client identifier ?
Is it in conf/context.xml of Tomcat
Or in
webappname/META-INF/context.xml
This has already been addressed in trunk, it does now inherit from
std::exception.
-
Timothy A. Bish
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message-
> From: Teemu Torma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007 5:58 PM
> To: users@a
Does this mean "this is a known bug in 4.1 and has been fixed", or "take
4.2-snapshot for a spin, and maybe it helps?"
We're running 4.1 in production, and this and other memory leaks (e.g.
the whole issue revolving around disconnect() not working with durable
topics) are causing major probl
A quick question.
Is there a reason why CMSException does not derive from std::exception?
Right now it introduces a parallel exception hierarchy which is a bit
annoying.
Teemu
[backfilling some messages]
GaryG wrote:
>
>
> On 2/5/07, Givental, Gary wrote:
>> Ah yes, I should have clarified that :)
>>
>> The nature of the applications makes that impossible. We need to
>> ensure that A) all the tasks are processed in sequential order, B)
>> each work task is tied
[backfilling some messages]
> James,
>
> I appreciate your help on this.
>
> To clarify, here's the gist of what I'm trying to accomplish:
>
> Essentially it is a worker farm that is controlled via a single master
> controller. There are some Topics on which status information is
> published b
I have applications A and B running in two different instances of Resin.
Each has a broker.
Application A puts messages onto a distributed queue and application B
consumes the messages using message driven pojo's. Both are configured
using Spring 2.0
What we've found is that when we stop Applic
Hi Rob,
does that mean the persistence is broken in 4.1 ? will you be updating the
4.2 release time line ? For now, I want to measure the performance impact of
using persistence and also see if it would solve the out of memory problem.
- Sandeep
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nab
Hello,
I've tried to configure 2 brokers, having one of them listen to a multicast
address and the other advertise itself using discovery. This configuration
is described
http://incubator.apache.org/activemq/what-is-the-difference-between-discovery-multicast-and-zeroconf.html
here
while I tr
Hi Sandeep,
I think using the latest snapshot for 4.2 will help:
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/org/apache/
activemq/apache-activemq/4.2-incubator-SNAPSHOT/
cheers,
Rob
On 5 Feb 2007, at 15:20, Sandeep Chayapathi wrote:
Hi all,
As a followup to these questions:
h
Hi all,
As a followup to these questions:
http://http://www.nabble.com/how-to-set-the-message-of-the-broker-will-store-in-the-mySQL-only-tf2957449.html#a8294916
how to set the message...
http://www.nabble.com/Queue-Memory-Limits-tf1857084.html Queue Memory limit
http://www.nabble.com/Async-Ex
On 2/5/07, Fredrik Jonson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Is the activemq 4.1 release available on any public maven 2 repository like
ibiblio?
Yes. There are links to the repos on the download page.
http://activemq.apache.org/download.html
e.g.
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-re
Nilantha Jayalath wrote:
>
>
> Thanks Christopher I did as you suggested but still the consumer stop
> receiving after the first exception. Only way to get those remaining
> messages consumed is restart the app with consumers again and again. Each
> time I see rediliveryCount has been increased
Hi,
Is the activemq 4.1 release available on any public maven 2 repository like
ibiblio? I found a message from last year saying something about it being a
incubator issue. Isn't that resolved yet?
TIA & regards,
--
Fredrik Jonson
On 2/4/07, blueshed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi there,
I'm using Stomp from python and have written my own implementation using
twisted. Works a treat.
Great! BTW do you have any plans to open source your twisted python
stomp client? It'd be good to refer to it on the Stomp site so
pythonist
HI James,
Can you describe in "lite" detail what would be needed to perform this
refactoring? What classes, etc.?
This would help me (and others, I suppose) assess whether I might take it
on.
thanks,
rob
James.Strachan wrote:
>
> Currently the Web Console is directly using the embedded bro
I'm stopping a broker's TransportConnector with the connector's stop()
method. If JMX is disabled, stopping the connector correctly fires an active
connection's ExceptionListener. If JMS is enabled, the Listener doesn't get
fired.
Is this expected behaviour?
--
View this message in context:
ht
Currently the Web Console is directly using the embedded broker (as it
was the simplest way to get started); we'd need to do a bit of
refactoring to be able to use the web console to connect to a remote
broker over JMX. It shouldn't be too hard to do if anyone fancies
taking a stab at a patch?
ht
Unfortunately the CMS and JMS APIs do not provide this capability directly.
What you could do is make it a string property and encode something at the
beginning (e.g. "int:123"), this way the application on the other end knows
how to decode it.
On 2/5/07, Lalit Nagpal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2/3/07, jkurtz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We are interested in pausing the message transmission periodically from
outside of Active MQ, while allowing incoming messages to accumulate.
Modifying the source code is an option, and we are looking at the transport
class.
Does anyone know if this
Yes, I just wanted to show config w/o prefetch stuff.
Anyway, setting vm://localhost?jms.prefetchPolicy.all, or policies for
queues, or for particular consumer via URL it all failed.
So did setting of resource adapter properties according to
http://activemq.apache.org/resource-adapter-properties.h
Hi
Just observed the ::cms::Message header file in CMS API - latest trunk code
The class gives different overloaded methods to store properties as int
/ float / string / double etc it also gives all the getter methods for
retrieving properties for int / float and so on .
In my code
28 matches
Mail list logo
