Here is the output of telnet.
bash-3.00$ telnet 150.123.186.61 61616
Trying 150.123.186.61...
Connected to 150.123.186.61.
Escape character is '^]'.
ÙActiveMQTightEncodingEnabled
CacheSizeTcpNoDelayEnabledSizePrefixDisabledStackTraceEnabled
MaxInactivityDurationInitalDelay'MaxInactivityDuratio
Does 'telnet 150.123.186.61 61616' work from you unix machine ?
_prasad wrote:
>
> Hi ,
>
> While developeing an application using Spring & ActiveMQ, I am getting the
> following exception.
> Sender is on UNIX machine.
> Broker and receiver are running on same Windows machine.
> From UNIX
Hi ,
While developeing an application using Spring & ActiveMQ, I am getting the
following exception.
Sender is on UNIX machine.
Broker and receiver are running on same Windows machine.
>From UNIX machine , I am able to "ping" successfully to Windows machine
where receiver & broker are running.
Thanks Rob.
It seems amazing to me that the product is broken when used like I am, and
no one noticed. Maybe my test case could be made into a unit test or
something?
-Nate
rajdavies wrote:
>
>
> On 5 Jun 2008, at 23:43, NateS wrote:
>
>>
>> We had been using 4.1.1 and recently upgraded to
A broker automatically retries connections to remote brokers.
Clients will also automatically retry connections to brokers, but they need
to use the 'failover' transport.
Joe
www.ttmsolutions.com
dlaidlaw wrote:
>
>
> OK, so JMS Bridges are not the recommended solution. And I will look at
Does anyone know if issue # AMQ-1195 is resolved and if so which version it
was resolved in? It seems like I have the same problem in ActiveMQ v 4.1.1
but it looks like it does not happen in 5.1.0. I am confused by the bug
report web page (found at https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1
Enable simple or JAAS-based authentication @ the broker.
http://activemq.apache.org/security.html
Then have your client pass in the proper username and password when creating
the JMS connection.
Its not HTTP Basic Authentication, but it should do the trick. For added
security, you can use the
OK, so JMS Bridges are not the recommended solution. And I will look at
camel and how robust I can make it. But in the mean time, what about a
network of brokers?
The broker network stuff also moves messages between brokers. In my case
they will all be ActiveMQ brokers so no issue about foreign
Hello,
I have a Java Client App, started with Webstart, that is using JMS to
communicating over the Internet to my ActiveMQ via the HTTP Connector
(to be clear, not the REST Servlet but the HTTP connector)
- How can I use Basic Authentication for this HTTP Connection ?
- His ther
On 20 Jun 2008, at 16:25, dlaidlaw wrote:
I was looking at the source code for JMS Bridges to see how robust the
connections would be. Would they auto-recover, retry delivery, were
they
transacted, etc. I noticed some code in there that seemed to be
aimed at
having retry behavior but no
I was looking at the source code for JMS Bridges to see how robust the
connections would be. Would they auto-recover, retry delivery, were they
transacted, etc. I noticed some code in there that seemed to be aimed at
having retry behavior but no loop for a retry.
Look at the org.apache.activemq.
Hi Joe,
ttmdev wrote:
You may want to look into setting up a Camel context to implement such
routing rules.
http://activemq.apache.org/enterprise-integration-patterns.html
I think I have done. I paste my activemq.xml file:
http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans";
xmlns:amq="http
You may want to look into setting up a Camel context to implement such
routing rules.
http://activemq.apache.org/enterprise-integration-patterns.html
Joe
www.ttmsolutions.com
Arnau wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Yesterday I discovered ActiveMQ and I have been banging my head
> against a wall :).
OK, I found some time to test this on 5.1 myself. Unfortunately the issue is
NOT resolved as far as I can tell.
I don't see how anyone can live with this...
Consider a system which processes 100 messages/sec, with MaximumRedeliveries
to 8 for a total of let's say an hour (in case of network fail
Hi all,
Yesterday I discovered ActiveMQ and I have been banging my head
against a wall :).
What I'd like to do is the following:
1. Create a local broker (A) that comunicates with a remote broker(B).
I'd use two diferent computers.
2. Define two queues on each broker TX and RX
3. All the m
15 matches
Mail list logo