Hi all,
I am planning to use ActiveMQ 5.2.0 in a project and I have made
some tests in a windows box to understand how the journal files work.
I am defining a Journaled JDBC with postgres for persistence this way.
persistenceAdapter
journaledJDBC journalLogFiles=5
and there is the checkpoint/cleanup task that writes a checkpoint record and
deletes old messages. I guess that delete statement is executed irrespective
if there are old messages or not.
I had debug logging going on a deployment and saw:
2009-04-17 11:59:59,599 [ce Adaptor Task] DEBUG
Hudson job for ActiveMQ has been set. From now on, it will be used to build
snapshots. You can also use it to see status of test failures. This implies
that snapshots location and Maven snapshot repository has been changed.
Find out more info on this in the following news item:
Does the current C/C++ ActiveMQ run/compile for Windows x64?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Support-for-Windows-x64-tp23099255p23099255.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 07:54 -0700, v2cg4ss wrote:
Does the current C/C++ ActiveMQ run/compile for Windows x64?
The next release of the C++ client, 2.2.6 will include x64 projects for
MSVC2005. The code builds, and runs, at least for static libraries, I'm
having some trouble getting it to build
Hello,
I'm trying to implement a method to remove queue which will check if the
queue has message on it :
if yes I throw an exception
else I remove the queue thanks BrokerService.removeDestination.
The problem I have is that the message store of my non temporary queue is
not removed from my AMQ
Update:
the test steps and results are:
1. send 20 messages to the broker, the admin console displays 20 messages,
numbered from 1 to 20
2. consume 10 messages using Stomp client (5.3-Snapshot version) with
ack:auto, now the admin console displays only messages numbered from 13 to
20 - it
Update #2:
Looks like it is only a problem in the Stomp Java client in ActiveMQ - I
will try to fix the source of my tests to see if it is a protocol error
(missing unsubscribe) or a problem in the underlying TCP transport layer.
After some tweaking, my Delphi library shows and better results
Bad news. After running fine as a standalone broker for two days, it died
again today with the same error. I've tried the syncOnWrite=true setting,
but it slows down the broker too much for what is acceptable in my system.
I think I'm pretty much out of options.
Stefan
Dave Stanley wrote:
I believe I figured out the performance problem. Currently we are using JDBC
master/slave.
The major performance problem is the socket connection is timing out on
whichever tcp address in the failover address is slave.
Example:
private static Uri _uri = new
The issues is that the BlobMessage needs jetty webserver to send File or
InputStream and it is not started by default when you start an embedded
broker. I found this post about starting the web server for embedded
broker.
Hi,
I'm using ActiveMQ 5.2.0 Server.
I publish a lot of events on a topic, and consume them. At some point,
after many messages, I get the message response from futureResponse was
invalid when I try to publish on that topic.
I can publish on other topics with no problem.
I broke out
12 matches
Mail list logo
